Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The diagnostic performance of endobronchial ultrasound with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra in smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis.
Yao, Lan; Chen, Shanhao; Sha, Wei; Gu, Ye.
Afiliação
  • Yao L; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Clinic and Research Center of Tuberculosis, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, China.
  • Chen S; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Clinic and Research Center of Tuberculosis, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, China.
  • Sha W; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Clinic and Research Center of Tuberculosis, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, China. shfksw@126.com.
  • Gu Y; Department of Bronchoscopy, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, China. drsymons@outlook.com.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 107, 2023 Feb 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36814228
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the diagnostic performance of endobronchial ultrasound with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) for detecting smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). METHODS: 143 patients suspected of sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis were enrolled in this study in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, China. These patients underwent endobronchial ultrasound with a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) or endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) based on their chest CT manifestations. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of tissue specimens with Ultra in the TB group and non-TB group. Culture and clinical diagnosis were used as gold-standard for TB. RESULTS: Among these 143 patients, 11 patients were culture-positive TB, 85 patients were diagnosed with culture-negative TB and 47 were with the non-TB diseases. Direct testing with microscopy (Acid-Fast Bacilli smear, AFB), liquid culture, pathology, Xpert MTB/RIF(Xpert) test and Ultra had a sensitivity of 8.3%, 11.5%, 42.7%, 64.6%, and 78.1% individually among all the TB patients. Ultra had a higher sensitivity than Xpert (P = 0.011). But Ultra had a specificity of 59.6% (95% CI 44.3-73.3), lower than that of Xpert (89.4%, 95% CI 76.1-96.0, P = 0.001). Ultra had the same sensitivity on specimens from EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-GS (P = 0.975). Ultra's positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 79.8% and 57.1% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Tissue specimens from interventional bronchoscopy combined with Ultra provide a sensitive method for diagnosing smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis, but its specificity was lower than Xpert.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tuberculose Pulmonar / Antibióticos Antituberculose / Mycobacterium tuberculosis Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: BMC Infect Dis Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tuberculose Pulmonar / Antibióticos Antituberculose / Mycobacterium tuberculosis Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: BMC Infect Dis Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China