Parathyroid carcinoma: Current management and outcomes - A systematic review.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Parathyroid carcinoma is rarely encountered in clinical practice. When faced with this clinical challenge, there is currently a paucity of evidence available for the optimal management of patients with parathyroid carcinoma. This systematic review synthesizes the available literature to evaluate the optimal management approach, thus providing guidance for future management. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases for studies, published in English, reporting on parathyroid carcinoma. Full text of potentially eligible articles were reviewed by two authors independently and eligible studies selected. Treatment options and associated outcomes were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were used to describe pooled patient cohorts. RESULTS: 3203 articles were initially identified using the search criteria with 59 full-text articles then screened for eligibility. Seven articles, all retrospective studies, concerning 2307 patients (median 224/study). Parathyroidectomy alone was the most frequently utilised surgical approach across all studies, followed by en-bloc resection (with adjacent thyroid and/or nodal tissue). There was no difference in post-operative morbidity, mortality or survival between surgical approaches (p < 0.005). Patients who underwent either form of surgery had longer overall survival than those managed non-operatively (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Surgical resection is the optimal treatment of parathyroid carcinoma. However there remains no consensus on the optimal extent of surgery, and as such future randomised prospective studies are necessary to evaluate the effects of different surgical approaches on morbidity, mortality and oncologic outcomes. Following resection, long-term surveillance with PTH is advised.