Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of image-enhanced endoscopy for colorectal adenoma detection: A multicenter, randomized trial.
Qi, Zhi-Peng; Xu, En-Pan; He, Dong-Li; Wang, Yan; Chen, Bai-Sheng; Dong, Xue-Si; Shi, Qiang; Cai, Shi-Lun; Guo, Qi; Li, Ni; Li, Xing; Huang, Hai-Yan; Li, Bing; Sun, Di; Xu, Jian-Guang; Chen, Zhang-Han; Yalikong, Ayimukedisi; Liu, Jin-Yi; Lv, Zhen-Tao; Xu, Jian-Min; Zhou, Ping-Hong; Zhong, Yun-Shi.
Afiliação
  • Qi ZP; Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China.
  • Xu EP; Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China.
  • He DL; Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital, Shanghai 200030, China.
  • Wang Y; Endoscopy Center, Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Rongcheng 264300, Shandong Province, China.
  • Chen BS; Department of Endoscopy Center, Xiamen Branch of Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Xiamen 361000, Fujian Province, China.
  • Dong XS; Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100000, China.
  • Shi Q; Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China.
  • Cai SL; Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China.
  • Guo Q; Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital, Shanghai 200030, China.
  • Li N; Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100000, China.
  • Li X; Department of Gastroenterology, Pingxiang People's Hospital, Pingxiang 337000, Jiangxi Province, China.
  • Huang HY; Department of Clinical Medicine, Xiaogang Hospital, Ningbo 315000, Zhejiang Province, China.
  • Li B; Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China.
  • Sun D; Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China.
  • Xu JG; Endoscopy Center, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou 324000, Zhejiang Province, China.
  • Chen ZH; Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China.
  • Yalikong A; Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China.
  • Liu JY; Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China.
  • Lv ZT; Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China.
  • Xu JM; Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China.
  • Zhou PH; Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China.
  • Zhong YS; Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China. zhong.yunshi@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
World J Gastrointest Oncol ; 15(5): 878-891, 2023 May 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37275449
BACKGROUND: Improved adenoma detection at colonoscopy has decreased the risk of developing colorectal cancer. However, whether image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) further improves the adenoma detection rate (ADR) is controversial. AIM: To compare IEE with white-light imaging (WLI) endoscopy for the detection and identification of colorectal adenoma. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Participants were enrolled between September 2019 to April 2021 from 4 hospital in China. Patients were randomly assigned to an IEE group with WLI on entry and IEE on withdrawal (n = 2113) or a WLI group with WLI on both entry and withdrawal (n = 2098). The primary outcome was the ADR. The secondary endpoints were the polyp detection rate (PDR), adenomas per colonoscopy, adenomas per positive colonoscopy, and factors related to adenoma detection. RESULTS: A total of 4211 patients (966 adenomas) were included in the analysis (mean age, 56.7 years, 47.1% male). There were 2113 patients (508 adenomas) in the IEE group and 2098 patients (458 adenomas) in the WLI group. The ADR in two group were not significantly different [24.0% vs 21.8%, 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99-1.23, P = 0.09]. The PDR was higher with IEE group (41.7%) than with WLI group (36.1%, 1.16, 95%CI: 1.07-1.25, P = 0.01). Differences in mean withdrawal time (7.90 ± 3.42 min vs 7.85 ± 3.47 min, P = 0.30) and adenomas per colonoscopy (0.33 ± 0.68 vs 0.28 ± 0.62, P = 0.06) were not significant. Subgroup analysis found that with narrow-band imaging (NBI), between-group differences in the ADR, were not significant (23.7% vs 21.8%, 1.09, 95%CI: 0.97-1.22, P = 0.15), but were greater with linked color imaging (30.9% vs 21.8%, 1.42, 95%CI: 1.04-1.93, P = 0.04). the second-generation NBI (2G-NBI) had an advantage of ADR than both WLI and the first-generation NBI (27.0% vs 21.8%, P = 0.01; 27.0% vs 21.2.0%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: This prospective study confirmed that, among Chinese, IEE didn't increase the ADR compared with WLI, but 2G-NBI increase the ADR.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: World J Gastrointest Oncol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: World J Gastrointest Oncol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China