Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The German version of the brief affective neuroscience personality scales including a LUST scale (BANPS-GL).
Fuchshuber, Jürgen; Prandstätter, Theresa; Andres, Deborah; Roithmeier, Lisa; Schmautz, Beate; Freund, Anton; Schwerdtfeger, Andreas; Unterrainer, Human-Friedrich.
Afiliação
  • Fuchshuber J; Center for Integrative Addiction Research (CIAR), Grüner Kreis Society, Vienna, Austria.
  • Prandstätter T; Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Andres D; Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Roithmeier L; Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Schmautz B; Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Freund A; Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Schwerdtfeger A; Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Unterrainer HF; Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Front Hum Neurosci ; 17: 1213156, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37484921
Objectives: This study presents the German version of the Brief Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales (BANPS), which includes an additional subscale for the dimension LUST. The BANPS represents a shortened version of the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales (ANPS), a self-report instrument to assess individual dispositions toward primary emotional systems as proposed by Jaak Panksepp. Methods: In a large sample (N = 926), the reliability and various facets of validity of the German translation of the BANPS were examined together with the newly included LUST scale. The BANPS-GL was related to the Big Five Inventory (BFI) and Sexual Sensation Seeking Scale (SSSS) and analyzed via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: Overall, the BANPS-GL exhibited reliabilities ranging from McDonald's ω = 0.70 (CARE) to α = 0.86 (SADNESS) and plausible correlations with external criteria. For CFA a correlated 7-factor model demonstrated good fit [TLI = 0.95; RMSEA = 0.04 (90% CI: 0.04, 0.05); SRMR = 0.06]. A similar fit was demonstrated for a 2-higher-factor model [TLI = 0.93; RMSEA = 0.05 (90% CI: 0.05, 0.06); SRMR = 0.07]. Conclusion: In broad agreement with the results of the original English version, the BANPS-GL showed good reliability and acceptable factorial validity, and overall improved the psychometric properties of the original long form. Finally, the inclusion of the dimension LUST allows for a complete coverage of the primary emotion dispositions as originally conceptualized by Panksepp.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Hum Neurosci Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Áustria

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Hum Neurosci Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Áustria