Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is Delaying a Coloanal Anastomosis the Ideal Solution for Rectal Surgery?: Analysis of a Multicentric Cohort of 564 Patients From the GRECCAR.
Collard, Maxime K; Rullier, Eric; Tuech, Jean-Jacques; Sabbagh, Charles; Souadka, Amine; Loriau, Jérome; Faucheron, Jean-Luc; Benoist, Stéphane; Dubois, Anne; Dumont, Frédéric; Germain, Adeline; Manceau, Gilles; Marchal, Frédéric; Sourrouille, Isabelle; Lakkis, Zaher; Lelong, Bernard; Derieux, Simon; Piessen, Guillaume; Laforest, Anaïs; Venara, Aurélien; Prudhomme, Michel; Brigand, Cécile; Duchalais, Emilie; Ouaissi, Mehdi; Lebreton, Gil; Rouanet, Philippe; Mège, Diane; Pautrat, Karine; Reynolds, Ian S; Pocard, Marc; Parc, Yann; Denost, Quentin; Lefevre, Jérémie H.
Afiliação
  • Collard MK; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
  • Rullier E; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Saint André Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
  • Tuech JJ; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Charles Nicole, Rouen, France.
  • Sabbagh C; Department of General and Digestive surgery, Amiens Hospital, France.
  • Souadka A; Department of General and Digestive surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Rabat, Marocco.
  • Loriau J; Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint-Joseph Hospital, Paris, France.
  • Faucheron JL; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hôpital Unversitaire de Grenoble, France.
  • Benoist S; Department of General and Digestive surgery, Hôpital du Kremlin-Bicêtre, Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
  • Dubois A; Department of General and Digestive surgery, CHU Clermont-Ferrand Site Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Dumont F; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Institut de cancérologie de l'ouest, Saint-Herblain, France.
  • Germain A; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Universitaire de Nancy, France.
  • Manceau G; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
  • Marchal F; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.
  • Sourrouille I; Department of Anesthesiology, Surgery and Interventional, Villejuif, France.
  • Lakkis Z; Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Besancon, Besancon, France.
  • Lelong B; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Institute Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
  • Derieux S; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses-Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France.
  • Piessen G; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Huriez, Lille, France.
  • Laforest A; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Institute Monsouris, Paris, France.
  • Venara A; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Universitaire d'Angers, France.
  • Prudhomme M; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Universitaire de Nîmes, France.
  • Brigand C; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires, Strasbourg, France.
  • Duchalais E; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, France.
  • Ouaissi M; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Trousseau - CHRU Hôpitaux de Tours, Chambray-lès-Tours, France.
  • Lebreton G; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, CHU côte de Nâcre, Caen, France.
  • Rouanet P; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
  • Mège D; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France.
  • Pautrat K; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.
  • Reynolds IS; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Pocard M; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrère, Paris, France.
  • Parc Y; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
  • Denost Q; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Bordeaux Colorectal Institute, Bordeaux, France.
  • Lefevre JH; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Ann Surg ; 278(5): 781-789, 2023 Nov 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37522163
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the specific results of delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCAA) in light of its 2 main indications.

BACKGROUND:

DCAA can be proposed either immediately after a low anterior resection (primary DCAA) or after the failure of a primary pelvic surgery as a salvage procedure (salvage DCAA).

METHODS:

All patients who underwent DCAA intervention at 30 GRECCAR-affiliated hospitals between 2010 and 2021 were retrospectively included.

RESULTS:

Five hundred sixty-four patients (male 63%; median age 62 years; interquartile range 53-69) underwent a DCAA 66% for primary DCAA and 34% for salvage DCAA. Overall morbidity, major morbidity, and mortality were 57%, 30%, and 1.1%, respectively, without any significant differences between primary DCAA and salvage DCAA ( P = 0.933; P = 0.238, and P = 0.410, respectively). Anastomotic leakage was more frequent after salvage DCAA (23%) than after primary DCAA (15%), ( P = 0.016).Fifty-five patients (10%) developed necrosis of the intra-abdominal colon. In multivariate analysis, intra-abdominal colon necrosis was significantly associated with male sex [odds ratio (OR) = 2.67 95% CI 1.22-6.49; P = 0.020], body mass index >25 (OR = 2.78 95% CI 1.37-6.00; P = 0.006), and peripheral artery disease (OR = 4.68 95% CI 1.12-19.1; P = 0.030). The occurrence of this complication was similar between primary DCAA (11%) and salvage DCAA (8%), ( P = 0.289).Preservation of bowel continuity was reached 3 years after DCAA in 74% of the cohort (primary DCAA 77% vs salvage DCAA 68%, P = 0.031). Among patients with a DCAA mannered without diverting stoma, 75% (301/403) have never required a stoma at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS:

DCAA makes it possible to definitively avoid a stoma in 75% of patients when mannered initially without a stoma and to save bowel continuity in 68% of the patients in the setting of failure of primary pelvic surgery.

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França