Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association of Medicare Program Type with Health Care Access, Utilization, and Affordability among Cancer Survivors.
Jafri, Faraz I; Patel, Vishal R; Xu, Jianhui; Polsky, Daniel; Gupta, Arjun; Hussaini, Syed Mohammed Qasim.
Afiliação
  • Jafri FI; Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
  • Patel VR; Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
  • Xu J; Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
  • Polsky D; Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
  • Gupta A; Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
  • Hussaini SMQ; Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(15)2023 Aug 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37568779
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Medicare Advantage program provides care to nearly half of Medicare beneficiaries, including a rapidly growing population of cancer survivors. Despite its increased adoption, it is still unknown whether or not the program improves healthcare access, outcomes, and affordability for cancer survivors.

METHODS:

We performed a cross-sectional study of Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years with a self-reported history of cancer from the 2019 National Health Interview Survey. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between Medicare program type (Medicare Advantage vs. traditional Medicare) and measures of healthcare access, acute care utilization, and affordability.

RESULTS:

We identified 4451 beneficiaries with a history of cancer, corresponding to 26.6 million weighted cancer survivors in 2019. Of the beneficiaries, 35.8% were enrolled in Medicare Advantage, whereas 64.2% were enrolled in traditional Medicare. The age, sex, racial and ethnic composition, household income, primary site of cancer, and comorbidity burden of Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare beneficiaries were similar. In the adjusted analysis, there were no differences in healthcare access or acute care utilization between traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. However, cancer survivors enrolled in Medicare Advantage were more likely to worry about (34.3% vs. 29.4%; aOR, 1.3 (95% CI, 1.1-1.5)) or have problems paying (13.6% vs. 11.1%; aOR, 1.4 (95% CI, 1.1-1.8)) medical bills.

CONCLUSIONS:

We found no evidence that Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with cancer had better healthcare access, affordability, or acute care utilization than traditional Medicare beneficiaries did. Furthermore, Medicare Advantage beneficiaries were more likely to report financial strain and have difficulty paying for their medical bills than were those with traditional Medicare. Despite the generous benefits and attractive incentives, Medicare Advantage plans may not be more cost-effective than traditional Medicare is for cancer survivors. Our study informs ongoing congressional deliberations to re-evaluate the role of Medicare Advantage in promoting equity among beneficiaries with cancer.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos