Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Agreement and precision of wide and cube scan measurements between swept-source and spectral-domain OCT in normal and glaucoma eyes.
Hou, Huiyuan; El-Nimri, Nevin W; Durbin, Mary K; Arias, Juan D; Moghimi, Sasan; Weinreb, Robert N.
Afiliação
  • Hou H; Topcon Healthcare, 111 Bauer Dr, Oakland, NJ, 07436, USA. hhou@topcon.com.
  • El-Nimri NW; Topcon Healthcare, 111 Bauer Dr, Oakland, NJ, 07436, USA.
  • Durbin MK; Topcon Healthcare, 111 Bauer Dr, Oakland, NJ, 07436, USA.
  • Arias JD; Topcon Healthcare, 111 Bauer Dr, Oakland, NJ, 07436, USA.
  • Moghimi S; Department of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Weinreb RN; Department of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 15876, 2023 09 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37741895
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to evaluate agreement of Wide scan measurements from swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) Triton and spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) Maestro in normal/glaucoma eyes, and to assess the precision of measurements from Wide and Cube scans of both devices. Three Triton and three Maestro operator/device configurations were created by pairing three operators, with study eye and testing order randomized. Three scans were captured for Wide (12 mm × 9 mm), Macular Cube (7 mm × 7 mm-Triton; 6 mm × 6 mm-Maestro), and Optic Disc Cube (6 mm × 6 mm) scans for 25 normal eyes and 25 glaucoma eyes. Parameter measurements included circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer(cpRNFL), ganglion cell layer + inner plexiform layer (GCL+), and ganglion cell complex (GCL++). A two-way random effect analysis of variance model was used to estimate the repeatability and reproducibility; agreement was evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis and Deming regression. The precision estimates were low, indicating high precision, for all thickness measurements with the majority of the limits < 5 µm for the macula and < 10 µm for the optic disc. Precision of the Wide and Cube scans were comparable. Excellent agreement between the two devices was found for Wide scans, with the mean difference < 3 µm across all measurements (cpRNFL < 3 µm, GCL+ < 2 µm, GCL ++ < 1 µm), indicating interoperability. A single Wide scan covering the peripapillary and macular regions may be useful for glaucoma diagnosis and management.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Disco Óptico / Glaucoma Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Disco Óptico / Glaucoma Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos