Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative cost-effectiveness of contemporary treatment strategies for stage IIA seminoma.
Joyce, Daniel D; Sharma, Vidit; Wymer, Kevin M; Moriarty, James P; Borah, Bijan J; Walia, Arman; Costello, Brian A; Pagliaro, Lance C; Daneshmand, Siamak; Leibovich, Bradley C; Boorjian, Stephen A.
Afiliação
  • Joyce DD; Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Sharma V; Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Wymer KM; Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Moriarty JP; Department of Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Borah BJ; Department of Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Walia A; Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Costello BA; Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Pagliaro LC; Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Daneshmand S; Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Leibovich BC; Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Boorjian SA; Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 116(3): 468-475, 2024 Mar 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37819776
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Surgery in Early Metastatic Seminoma (SEMS) trial examined retroperitoneal lymph node dissection as first-line treatment for patients with isolated 1-3 cm retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. To date, the standard of care for these patients has been either chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Herein, we evaluated the relative cost-effectiveness of these management strategies.

METHODS:

A microsimulation model assessed the cost-effectiveness of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy for stage IIA seminoma. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate model robustness. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection recurrence probabilities were obtained from the SEMS trial. All other probability and utility values were obtained from published literature. Primary outcomes included costs from a commercial insurer's perspective, effectiveness (quality adjusted life-years [QALYs]), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY.

RESULTS:

At a lifetime horizon, the mean costs per patient for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were $58 469, $98 783, and $104 096, and the mean QALYs were 40.61, 40.70, and 39.15, respectively. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was found to be the most cost-effective approach because of high costs and accrued disutility of chronic toxicities associated with radiotherapy (cost-effectiveness ratios = $433 845/QALY) and chemotherapy (dominated). On 1-way sensitivity analyses, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was no longer cost-effective if the probabilities of infertility and cardiovascular toxicity after radiotherapy were less than 13% and 16%, respectively, or if the 2-year probability of progression after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was more than 26%.

CONCLUSIONS:

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was the most cost-effective treatment approach for stage IIA seminoma. These findings support clinical guideline consideration of including retroperitoneal lymph node dissection as a treatment option for well-selected patients with stage IIA seminoma.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Testiculares / Seminoma Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Natl Cancer Inst Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Testiculares / Seminoma Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Natl Cancer Inst Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos