Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP in migraine prevention. GRADE tables elaborated by the ad hoc working group of the International Headache Society.
Aleksovska, Katina; Hershey, Andrew D; Deen, Marie; Icco, Robert de; Lee, Mi Ji; Diener, Hans-Christoph.
Afiliação
  • Aleksovska K; Department of Neurology, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Macedonia.
  • Hershey AD; Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA.
  • Deen M; Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet - Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.
  • Icco R; Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
  • Lee MJ; Headache Science & Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
  • Diener HC; Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Cephalalgia ; 43(10): 3331024231206162, 2023 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37879637
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Grading of Recommendations, Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tables were created using a standardized and independent assessment of the efficacy and side effects of treatments with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or the CGRP receptor for the prevention of migraine. We hope to provide support for author groups writing national or regional treatment or management guidelines for migraine prevention.

METHODS:

We formulated patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcomes (PICO) questions for the efficacy and safety of mAb against CGRP or the CGRP-receptor for the prevention of migraine attacks. We performed a systematic literature research for randomized studies with eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab and galcanezumab and a pooled analysis was done, using RevMan 5.4 software. For dichotomous outcomes we used risk ratio, and for continuous outcomes we used the mean difference to compare and summarize the evidence between groups. The evidence across studies, for each outcome, except serious adverse events, was assessed using GRADE evidence tables. Additionally, we report the serious adverse effects in the tables of the characteristics of the studies.

RESULTS:

All mAb are superior to placebo for the reduction in monthly migraine days (days in which a headache consistent with migraine occurred) in participants with episodic and chronic migraine. There are no major differences between the mAb.

CONCLUSIONS:

The GRADE evidence summary tables provided will support author groups to write treatment guidelines for the prevention of migraine with mAb.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Peptídeo Relacionado com Gene de Calcitonina / Transtornos de Enxaqueca Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cephalalgia Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Peptídeo Relacionado com Gene de Calcitonina / Transtornos de Enxaqueca Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cephalalgia Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article