Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development and validation of primary health care quality assessment tool.
Farrokhi, Pouria; Zarei, Ehsan; Bagherzadeh, Rafat; Irannejad, Behrooz; Hashjin, Asgar Aghaei.
Afiliação
  • Farrokhi P; Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Zarei E; Department of Health Service Management, School of Management and Medical Education, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Bagherzadeh R; School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Irannejad B; Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Hashjin AA; School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. asgar.aghaei.h@gmail.com.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 1156, 2023 Oct 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37885033
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Assessing the quality of health services gives insights to managers about the status of services delivered by them, especially from the client's perspective. Although various tools have been developed to measure the quality of primary health care (PHC), no specific tool was found in this field in Iran. Therefore, the present study was conducted to develop and validate the quality assessment tool of PHC in Iran.

METHODS:

This methodological study was conducted in 2021. In the first step, based on a literature review, an initial questionnaire was designed, and its face validity, content validity, construct validity, and reliability were evaluated. Descriptive tests, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, exploratory factor analysis, Kaiser-Myer-Olkin (KMO), and Cronbach's alpha were performed by using SPSS 22.

RESULTS:

The initial questionnaire included 33 items, of which three items were removed due to inconsistency with factorization. The final questionnaire consisted of 30 items and nine dimensions interaction, efficiency, timeliness, accuracy, consultation, tangibility, safety, accessibility, and environment. The KMO and Cronbach's alpha index values were 0.734 and 0.82, respectively, indicating acceptable reliability and validity. The developed dimensions represented about 73% of the total variance.

CONCLUSION:

The designed questionnaire has relatively good validity and reliability and can be used to measure the quality of PHC and to identify weaknesses in service delivery. However, researchers should carefully examine it to enhance its applicability as a standard tool for measuring PHC quality.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde / Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irã

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde / Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irã