Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage and Factors Influencing Vaccine Hesitancy among Patients with Inborn Errors of Immunity in Latvia: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Lucane, Zane; Kursite, Mirdza; Sablinskis, Kristaps; Gailite, Linda; Kurjane, Natalja.
Afiliação
  • Lucane Z; Department of Biology and Microbiology, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.
  • Kursite M; Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.
  • Sablinskis K; Department of Internal Diseases, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.
  • Gailite L; Scientific Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.
  • Kurjane N; Department of Biology and Microbiology, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(11)2023 Oct 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38005969
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The European Society for Immunodeficiencies recommends that all patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI) without contraindications should receive SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The aim of this study was to investigate the reasons that discourage IEI patients from receiving the recommended vaccination and to assess vaccination coverage among IEI patients in Latvia.

METHODS:

In this multicenter mixed-methods study, the vaccination status of all patients with IEI within two tertiary centers in Latvia was reviewed using electronic health records. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 IEI patients who did not undergo vaccination, and a thematic analysis was performed.

RESULTS:

A total of 341 patients (49.3% female; median age 19.7 years (IQR17)) were included in the quantitative part. The proportion of fully vaccinated individuals aged ≥ 12 years was 66.8%-70.9% with patients with selective IgA deficiency and 58.8% with other IEI (χ² = 14.12, p < 0.001). The proportion of fully vaccinated individuals aged 5-11 years was 11.1%. Age was associated with vaccination status younger patients were found to have a significantly lower likelihood of receiving vaccination (U = 8585, p < 0.001). The five main themes identified were as follows (1) fear and uncertainty; (2) risk and benefit assessment COVID-19 vaccine-is it worth it? (3) external influences the dark horse of the decision-making-people around us; (4) individuals against the system; and (5) beliefs about vaccination and COVID-19. Under-representation of certain IEI groups and recall bias are possible limitations of this study.

CONCLUSIONS:

While most reasons for hesitancy were similar to those previously described in the general population, disease-specific concerns were also identified.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Vaccines (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Letônia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Vaccines (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Letônia