Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Therapy With Metronomic Cyclophosphamide (mCyc) for Previously-Treated Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC).
Mar, Nataliya; Dwabe, Sami; Baranda, Marlon N; Zarrabi, Kevin K; Eturi, Aditya; Gulati, Shuchi; Parikh, Mamta; Seyedin, Steven N; Kalebasty, Arash Rezazadeh.
Afiliação
  • Mar N; Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA. Electronic address: marn@hs.uci.edu.
  • Dwabe S; Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA.
  • Baranda MN; Norton Cancer Institute, Louisville, KY.
  • Zarrabi KK; Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Eturi A; Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Gulati S; Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA.
  • Parikh M; Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA.
  • Seyedin SN; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA.
  • Kalebasty AR; Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 22(2): 217-223, 2024 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38087703
INTRODUCTION: Despite the introduction of various novel therapies for management of metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in recent decades, available treatment options are finite and remain limited. Multiple historical studies have demonstrated activity and a favorable toxicity profile of oral metronomic cyclophosphamide (mCyc) in prostate cancer (PCa). Unlike the cytotoxic immunosuppressive effects of high-dose intravenously-administered cyclophosphamide, continuous low doses of oral mCyc have a unique immune-stimulatory mechanism of action. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, multi-institution study of men with 43 patients with mCRPC treated mCyc. Patient demographic information as well as clinical, pathologic, and genomic characteristics of their PCa were extracted. The primary endpoint was the rate of PSA decline by ≥ 50% (ie, PSA50). Additional efficacy and toxicity data as well as cost analysis compared to other commonly used agents in mCRPC was obtained. RESULTS: PSA50 was noted in 20.9% of patients, while an additional 25.6% patients achieved < PSA50 and 6.9% reported improvement in prostate cancer-related symptoms without any PSA reduction. Meanwhile, 9.3% of patients required mCyc dose reduction, 11.6% needed dose interruption due to toxicity, and no treatment discontinuations due to toxicity were observed. mCyc was also cost effective compared to other agents commonly used in mCRPC. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the small sample size and retrospective nature of this dataset, mCyc demonstrated promising rapid activity and a tolerable toxicity profile in a heavily pretreated mCRPC population with aggressive clinical, pathologic, and genomic disease features.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Antígeno Prostático Específico / Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Clin Genitourin Cancer Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Antígeno Prostático Específico / Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Clin Genitourin Cancer Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article