Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Neuronal differentiation drives the antitumor activity of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibition in glioblastoma.
Khan, Sabbir; Martinez-Ledesma, Emmanuel; Dong, Jianwen; Mahalingam, Rajasekaran; Park, Soon Young; Piao, Yuji; Koul, Dimpy; Balasubramaniyan, Veerakumar; de Groot, John F; Yung, W K Alfred.
Afiliação
  • Khan S; Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Martinez-Ledesma E; Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Dong J; Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico.
  • Mahalingam R; Tecnologico de Monterrey, Institute for Obesity Research, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico.
  • Park SY; Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Piao Y; Department of Symptom Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Koul D; Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Balasubramaniyan V; Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • de Groot JF; Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Yung WKA; Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Neurooncol Adv ; 5(1): vdad132, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38130900
ABSTRACT

Background:

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification is found in nearly 40%-50% of glioblastoma cases. Several EGFR inhibitors have been tested in glioblastoma but have failed to demonstrate long-term therapeutic benefit, presumably because of acquired resistance. Targeting EGFR downstream signaling with mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 and 2 (MEK1/2) inhibitors would be a more effective approach to glioblastoma treatment. We tested the therapeutic potential of MEK1/2 inhibitors in glioblastoma using 3D cultures of glioma stem-like cells (GSCs) and mouse models of glioblastoma.

Methods:

Several MEK inhibitors were screened in an unbiased high-throughput platform using GSCs. Cell death was evaluated using flow cytometry and Western blotting (WB) analysis. RNA-seq, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, immunofluorescence, and WB analysis were used to identify and validate neuronal differentiation.

Results:

Unbiased screening of multiple MEK inhibitors in GSCs showed antiproliferative and apoptotic cell death in sensitive cell lines. An RNA-seq analysis of cells treated with trametinib, a potent MEK inhibitor, revealed upregulation of neurogenesis and neuronal differentiation genes, such as achaete-scute homolog 1 (ASCL1), delta-like 3 (DLL3), and neurogenic differentiation 4 (NeuroD4). We validated the neuronal differentiation phenotypes in vitro and in vivo using selected differentiation markers (ß-III-tubulin, ASCL1, DLL3, and NeuroD4). Oral treatment with trametinib in an orthotopic GSC xenograft model significantly improved animal survival, with 25%-30% of mice being long-term survivors.

Conclusions:

Our findings demonstrated that MEK1/2 inhibition promotes neuronal differentiation in glioblastoma, a potential additional mechanism of action of MEK1/2 inhibitors. Thus, MEK inhibitors could be efficacious in glioblastoma patients with activated EGFR/MAPK signaling.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Neurooncol Adv Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Neurooncol Adv Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos