Functioning, clinical severity, education and sex moderate the inverse relationship between insight and quality of life in patients with schizophrenia.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In schizophrenia, insight, the recognition that one has a medical illness that requires treatment, has long been related to deteriorated quality of life, a phenomenon that has been described as the "insight paradox". Here, we aimed to determine whether certain socio-demographic and clinical characteristics strengthen or weaken this negative relationship. METHODS: We used data from the French network of rehabilitation centers REHABase (N = 769). We explored mean differences in quality-of-life scores between patients with good insight vs. poor insight. We also explored modifying effects of socio-demographic and clinical characteristics (sex, education, age, functioning, clinical severity, duration of illness). RESULTS: Patients with good insight had a decreased quality-of-life total score. Similar effects were found for the following sub-dimensions of quality of life autonomy, physical and psychological well-being, and self-esteem. The negative effect of insight on quality of life was attenuated for people who had >12 years of education and for people with a higher level of functioning. By contrast, the negative effect of insight on quality of life was accentuated in people with greater clinical severity. Functioning and clinical severity showed similar modifying effects for other quality-of-life dimensions autonomy, physical and psychological well-being, and self-esteem. Finally, males demonstrated an increased negative association between insight and self-esteem. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between insight and quality of life is moderated by socio-demographic and clinical circumstances. Future inquiries may utilize our findings by integrating socio-demographic and clinical factors in treatment programs designs to conjointly improve insight and quality of life.