Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Principles of belief acquisition. How we read other minds.
Pascarelli, M T; Quarona, D; Barchiesi, G; Riva, G; Butterfill, S A; Sinigaglia, C.
Afiliação
  • Pascarelli MT; Cognition in Action (CIA) Unit, PHILAB, 20122 Milan, Italy; Department of Philosophy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Quarona D; Cognition in Action (CIA) Unit, PHILAB, 20122 Milan, Italy; Department of Philosophy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Barchiesi G; Cognition in Action (CIA) Unit, PHILAB, 20122 Milan, Italy; Department of Philosophy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Riva G; Applied Technology for Neuro-Psychology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy; Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
  • Butterfill SA; Department of Philosophy, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
  • Sinigaglia C; Cognition in Action (CIA) Unit, PHILAB, 20122 Milan, Italy; Department of Philosophy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Philosophy, Stanford University, CA, USA. Electronic address: corrado.sinigaglia@unimi.it.
Conscious Cogn ; 117: 103625, 2024 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38159535
ABSTRACT
Reading other minds is a pervasive feature of human social life. A decade of research indicates that people can automatically track an agent's beliefs regardless of whether this is required. But little is known about the principles t guide automatic belief tracking. In six experiments adapting a false belief task introduced by Kovács et al. (2010), we tested whether belief tracking is interrupted by either an agent's lack of perceptual access or else by an agent's constrained action possibilities. We also tested whether such manipulations create interruptions when participants were instructed to track beliefs. Our main

finding:

the agent's lack of perceptual access did not interrupt belief tracking when participants were not instructed to track beliefs. Overall, our findings raise a challenge some of the phenomena that have been labelled mindreading are perhaps not mindreading at all, or-more likely-they are mindreading but not as we know it.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Teoria da Mente Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Conscious Cogn Assunto da revista: PSICOFISIOLOGIA / PSICOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Teoria da Mente Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Conscious Cogn Assunto da revista: PSICOFISIOLOGIA / PSICOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália