Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Learning health system benefits: Development and initial validation of a framework.
Welch, Lisa C; Brewer, Sarah K; Schleyer, Titus; Daudelin, Denise; Paranal, Rechelle; Hunt, Joe D; Dozier, Ann M; Perry, Anna; Cabrera, Alyssa B; Gatto, Cheryl L.
Afiliação
  • Welch LC; Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute Tufts University Boston Massachusetts USA.
  • Brewer SK; Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute Tufts University Boston Massachusetts USA.
  • Schleyer T; Center for Biomedical Informatics Regenstrief Institute Indianapolis Indiana USA.
  • Daudelin D; Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA.
  • Paranal R; Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute Tufts University Boston Massachusetts USA.
  • Hunt JD; South Carolina Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.
  • Dozier AM; Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA.
  • Perry A; University of Rochester Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Rochester New York USA.
  • Cabrera AB; Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.
  • Gatto CL; Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute Tufts University Boston Massachusetts USA.
Learn Health Syst ; 8(1): e10380, 2024 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38249854
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Implementation of research findings in clinical practice often is not realized or only partially achieved, and if so, with a significant delay. Learning health systems (LHSs) hold promise to overcome this problem by embedding clinical research and evidence-based best practices into care delivery, enabling innovation and continuous improvement. Implementing an LHS is a complex process that requires participation and resources of a wide range of stakeholders, including healthcare leaders, clinical providers, patients and families, payers, and researchers. Engaging these stakeholders requires communicating clear, tangible value propositions. Existing models identify broad categories of benefits but do not explicate the full range of benefits or ways they can manifest in different organizations.

Methods:

To develop such a framework, a working group with representatives from six Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs reviewed existing literature on LHS characteristics, models, and goals; solicited expert input; and applied the framework to their local LHS experiences.

Results:

The Framework of LHS Benefits includes six categories of benefits (quality, safety, equity, patient satisfaction, reputation, and value) relevant for a range of stakeholders and defines key concepts within each benefit. Applying the framework to five LHS case examples indicated preliminary face validity across varied LHS approaches and revealed three dimensions in which the framework is relevant defining goals of individual LHS projects, facilitating collaboration based on shared values, and establishing guiding tenets of an LHS program or mission.

Conclusion:

The framework can be used to communicate the value of an LHS to different stakeholders across varied contexts and purposes, and to identify future organizational priorities. Further validation will contribute to the framework's evolution and support its potential to inform the development of tools to evaluate LHS impact.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Learn Health Syst Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Learn Health Syst Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article