Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline: 2024 Amendment.
Holzbeierlein, Jeffrey M; Bixler, Brooke R; Buckley, David I; Chang, Sam S; Holmes, Rebecca; James, Andrew C; Kirkby, Erin; McKiernan, James M; Schuckman, Anne K.
Afiliação
  • Holzbeierlein JM; Department of Urology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
  • Bixler BR; American Urological Association, Linthicum, Maryland.
  • Buckley DI; Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
  • Chang SS; Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Holmes R; Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
  • James AC; Department of Urology, Texas Urology Group, San Antonio, Texas.
  • Kirkby E; American Urological Association, Linthicum, Maryland.
  • McKiernan JM; Department of Urology, University of Columbia, New York, New York.
  • Schuckman AK; Department of Urology, University of Southern California Urological Oncology, Los Angeles, California.
J Urol ; 211(4): 533-538, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38265030
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this American Urological Association (AUA)/Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) guideline amendment is to provide a useful reference on the effective evidence-based treatment strategies for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

In 2023, the NMIBC guideline was updated through the AUA amendment process in which newly published literature is reviewed and integrated into previously published guidelines in an effort to maintain currency. The amendment allowed for the incorporation of additional literature released since the previous 2020 amendment. The updated search gathered literature from July 2019 to May 2023. This review identified 1918 abstracts, of which 75 met inclusion criteria.When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) in support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions.

RESULTS:

Updates were made to statements on variant histologies, urine markers after diagnosis of bladder cancer, intravesical therapy, BCG maintenance, enhanced cystoscopy, and future directions. Further revisions were made to the methodology and reference sections as appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS:

This guideline seeks to improve clinicians' ability to evaluate and treat patients with NMIBC based on currently available evidence. Future studies will be essential to further support or refine these statements to improve patient care.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Urologia / Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Neoplasias não Músculo Invasivas da Bexiga Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Urol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Urologia / Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Neoplasias não Músculo Invasivas da Bexiga Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Urol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article