Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ultrasound Incorporation in Gross Anatomy Labs in a Master of Medical Sciences Program: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Student Performance and Perception.
Robertson, Taylor; Meyer, Kimberly; Kerr, Marcel Satsky; Gibson, John; Bradley, Libby; Reeves, Rustin; Handler, Emma.
Afiliação
  • Robertson T; Department of Physiology and Anatomy, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
  • Meyer K; School of Biomedical Sciences, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
  • Kerr MS; Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
  • Gibson J; Department of Family Medicine, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand.
  • Bradley L; Department of Radiology, Division of Anatomy, Michigan State University, Lansing, MI, USA.
  • Reeves R; Department of Physiology and Anatomy, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
  • Handler E; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
J Ultrasound Med ; 43(6): 999-1011, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38369775
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Teaching ultrasound imaging is on the rise in undergraduate medical anatomy education. However, there is little research exploring the use of ultrasound in preparatory graduate programs. The purpose of this study is to identify the effects of ultrasound imaging inclusion in a graduate gross anatomy course.

METHODS:

Master of Medical Sciences students were enrolled in a prosection-based anatomy course that included pinned cadaver stations and an ultrasound station. Using ultrasound, teaching assistants imaged volunteers demonstrating anatomical structures students previously learned at cadaver stations. Students answered one ultrasound image question on each practical exam and were asked to participate in a pre- and post-course survey. Student practical and lecture exam scores and final course grades from the 2022 cohort were compared to a historical control cohort from 2021 via statistical analysis, including a survey administered to the 2022 cohort.

RESULTS:

Two hundred students from the 2021 cohort and 164 students from the 2022 cohort participated in this study. Students in the 2022 cohort had significantly higher scores in 1 of the 5 practical exams (P < .05, d = .289), and 2 of the 5 written exams (P < .05, d = .207), (P < .05, d = .311). Survey data revealed increased (P < .05, d = 1.203) learning outcome achievement from pre-survey to post-survey in the intervention cohort. Students who correctly answered the ultrasound question performed significantly better on practical's 3 (P < .05) and 4 (P < .05) than those who missed the ultrasound question.

CONCLUSIONS:

These findings suggest that ultrasound imaging in a cadaver lab is beneficial to graduate students' learning and understanding of gross anatomy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Ultrassonografia / Currículo / Avaliação Educacional / Anatomia Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Ultrasound Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Ultrassonografia / Currículo / Avaliação Educacional / Anatomia Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Ultrasound Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos