Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Early outcomes and risk factors for complications after facial alloplastic implant surgery: An ACS-NSQIP study.
Kauke-Navarro, Martin; Knoedler, Leonard; Deniz, Can; Knoedler, Samuel; Safi, Ali-Farid.
Afiliação
  • Kauke-Navarro M; Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Craniologicum, Center for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: kauke-navarro.martin@yale.edu.
  • Knoedler L; Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Deniz C; Craniologicum, Center for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Knoedler S; Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Safi AF; Craniologicum, Center for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Bern, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: safi@craniologicum.ch.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 90: 209-214, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38387417
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Facial implantology (FI) is a growing field in facial surgery that focuses on harmonizing and balancing facial features. Despite its increasing popularity, larger-scale studies on FI outcomes and risks are scarce.

METHODS:

The ACS-NSQIP (2008-2021) was queried to identify patients who underwent combined/isolated alloplastic FI surgery of the malar/mandibular region. Based on CPT codes (21125; 21270), procedures were subdivided into combined or isolated FI surgery of the malar or the mandibular region.

RESULTS:

The study population included 84 patients, of which n = 19 (23%), n = 10 (12%), n = 33 (39%), and n = 22 (26%) underwent combined malar, isolated malar, combined mandibular, and isolated mandibular FI surgery, respectively. Isolated malar (total n = 10) and mandibular FI surgery (total n = 22) patients had relatively high comorbidity rates with up to n = 6 (60%) active smokers and n = 9 (41%) with hypertension, respectively. Combined malar (n = 19) and mandibular FI surgeries (n = 33) had the highest complication rates with n = 3 (16%) and n = 5 (15%) patients experiencing any complications. For both isolated malar and mandibular FI procedures, n = 1 (10% and 4.5%) patient reported any complications.

CONCLUSION:

In this study, we accessed the ACS-NSQIP database and found alloplastic augmentation for zygoma and mandible to be safe. Patients who underwent combined procedures and mandibular augmentation were more likely to show complications or require inpatient stay. Most alloplastic augmentations of mandible or zygoma were combined with other procedures (62%) which suggests that alloplastic facial implants (in the academic setting) are often used as an adjunct in the treatment of complex craniofacial disorders.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Face Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Face Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article