Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Proficiency Levels and Validity Evidence for Scoring Metrics for a Virtual Reality and Inanimate Robotic Surgery Simulation Curriculum.
Tellez, Juan C; Radi, Imad; Alterio, Rodrigo E; Nagaraj, Madhuri B; Baker, Haley B; Scott, Daniel J; Zeh, Herbert J; Polanco, Patricio M.
Afiliação
  • Tellez JC; Medical School, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Radi I; Department of Surgery, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia.
  • Alterio RE; Department of Surgery, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida.
  • Nagaraj MB; Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Baker HB; Department of Otolaryngology, Case Western Reserve University/University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Scott DJ; Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Zeh HJ; Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Polanco PM; Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. Electronic address: Patricio.Polanco@utsouthwestern.edu.
J Surg Educ ; 81(4): 589-596, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38403503
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Our institution recently implemented a virtual reality (VR) skills curriculum for general surgery residents using the SimNow simulator. Based on a content alignment study, we revised the curriculum to include only 20 of 33 VR tasks and we added 3 previously validated inanimate tasks. The purpose of this study was to establish expert-derived proficiency levels for all tasks and to evaluate the validity of the scoring for the VR tasks.

DESIGN:

Two expert robotic surgeons performed 5 repetitions of each VR and inanimate task. The trimmed mean (lowest scoring attempt and outliers [>2 standard deviations] were eliminated) was defined as the expert level for each task. For the VR tasks, expert levels were compared to resident performance to evaluate validity.

SETTING:

This study was conducted at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (Dallas, TX), a tertiary care academic teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS:

Two expert robotic surgeons participated in this study. The data from 42 residents (PGY2-4) who completed the original curriculum was used to represent novice performance.

RESULTS:

Comparison of expert levels and resident performance was statistically significant for 15 VR tasks (supporting validity) and approached significance (p = 0.06, 0.09) for 2 VR tasks; expert levels were designated as proficiency levels for these 17 tasks. Group comparisons were clearly not significant (p = 0.2-0.8) for 3 VR tasks; 2 of these 3 tasks were retained as introductory exercises (with 3 repetitions required) and 1 was excluded. For the 3 inanimate tasks, expert levels minus 2 standard deviations were designated as proficiency levels.

CONCLUSIONS:

This analysis generated validity evidence for 15 VR tasks and established expert-derived proficiency levels for 17 VR tasks and 3 inanimate tasks. Our proposed curriculum now consists of 19 VR and 3 inanimate tasks using the selected proficiency levels. We anticipate that this design will maximize curriculum efficiency and effectiveness.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos / Realidade Virtual Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Educ Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos / Realidade Virtual Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Educ Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article