Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment and application of non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review.
Mahendran, Vimaladhithan; Turpin, Laura; Boal, Matthew; Francis, Nader K.
Afiliação
  • Mahendran V; MSc Patient Safety and Human Clinical Factors, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Turpin L; Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital, Yeovil, UK.
  • Boal M; Division of Medicine, BSc Applied Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
  • Francis NK; Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital Campus, University College London, London, UK.
Surg Endosc ; 38(4): 1758-1774, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38467862
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Undeniably, robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has become very popular in recent decades, but it has introduced challenges to the workflow of the surgical team. Non-technical skills (NTS) have received less emphasis than technical skills in training and assessment. The systematic review aimed to update the evidence on the role of NTS in robotic surgery, specifically focusing on evaluating assessment tools and their utilisation in training and surgical education in robotic surgery.

METHODS:

A systematic literature search of PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and EMBASE was conducted to identify primary articles on NTS in RAS. Messick's validity framework and the Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument were utilised to evaluate the quality of the validity evidence of the abstracted articles.

RESULTS:

Seventeen studies were eligible for the final analysis. Communication, environmental factors, anticipation and teamwork were key NTS for RAS. Team-related factors such as ambient noise and chatter, inconveniences due to repeated requests during the procedure and constraints due to poor design of the operating room may harm patient safety during RAS. Three novel rater-based scoring systems and one sensor-based method for assessing NTS in RAS were identified. Anticipation by the team to predict and execute the next move before an explicit verbal command improved the surgeon's situational awareness.

CONCLUSION:

This systematic review highlighted the paucity of reporting on non-technical skills in robotic surgery with only three bespoke objective assessment tools being identified. Communication, environmental factors, anticipation, and teamwork are the key non-technical skills reported in robotic surgery, and further research is required to investigate their benefits to improve patient safety during robotic surgery.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Competência Clínica / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Competência Clínica / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article