Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Justice involvement prediction as individuals age: An age-graded evaluation of the public safety assessment.
Silver, Ian A; DeMichele, Matthew; Dole, Jenna L; Labrecque, Ryan M; Dawes, Debbie.
Afiliação
  • Silver IA; Center for Legal Systems Research, Research Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park.
  • DeMichele M; Center for Legal Systems Research, Research Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park.
  • Dole JL; Center for Legal Systems Research, Research Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park.
  • Labrecque RM; Center for Legal Systems Research, Research Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park.
  • Dawes D; Center for Legal Systems Research, Research Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park.
Law Hum Behav ; 48(2): 148-161, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38602807
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Some scholars have criticized pretrial assessments for perpetuating racial bias in the criminal legal system by offering biased predictions of future legal system outcomes. Although these critiques have some empirical support, the scholarship has yet to examine the predictive validity and differential prediction of pretrial assessments across individuals by their age. Following the guidance of the life-course literature, the present study serves as the first age-graded evaluation of the Public Safety Assessment (PSA) focused on assessing whether the predictive validity and scoring predictions of the tool vary across the lifespan. HYPOTHESES We expected that the predictive validity of the PSA scores would vary across the lifespan, such that the PSA underpredicts for younger individuals and overpredicts for older individuals.

METHOD:

The present study relied on pretrial information collected from 31,527 individuals during the Advancing Pretrial Policy and Research project. Logistic regression models were estimated to evaluate the differential prediction of the PSA for individuals ranging from 18 to 68 years of age. The results of bivariate models were used to produce area under the curve estimates at each year of age.

RESULTS:

The results of the present study provided some evidence that the PSA differentially predicted pretrial outcomes for individuals from 18 to 68 years of age. Specifically, the predictive validity of the New Criminal Arrest and the New Violent Criminal Arrest scales appears to improve as individuals become older, suggesting that these instruments are better able to predict pretrial outcomes for older individuals relative to younger individuals.

CONCLUSION:

The results suggest that the PSA is a valid predictor of pretrial outcomes and that the predictive validity of some PSA scores is impacted by age. These findings suggest that the age of the defendant should be accounted for when interpreting the new criminal arrest and new violent criminal arrest scores. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Criminosos Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Law Hum Behav Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Criminosos Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Law Hum Behav Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article