Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Occupational Noise Exposure in the Pediatric Dental Setting.
Bates, Mackenzie; Hsu, Timothy; Yepes, Juan; Phasuk, Kamolphob; Walerstein, Jakub; Discolo, Christopher; Eckert, George; Scully, Allison C.
Afiliação
  • Bates M; Richmond, Va., USA;, Email: batesma@iu.edu.
  • Hsu T; Department of Music and Arts Technology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.
  • Yepes J; Indiana University School of Dentistry and Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Dentistry and Riley Hospital for Children.
  • Phasuk K; Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, School of Dentistry, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
  • Walerstein J; Department of Music and Arts Technology, Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.
  • Discolo C; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Surgery, School of Medicine, Indiana University, all in Indianapolis, Ind., USA.
  • Eckert G; Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.
  • Scully AC; Indiana University School of Dentistry and Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Dentistry and Riley Hospital for Children.
Pediatr Dent ; 46(2): 108-114, 2024 Mar 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38664909
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

To evaluate the noise levels recorded in a hospital-based pediatric dental clinic and evaluate the occupational exposure personnel have to potentially hazardous levels of noise.

Methods:

A SoundAdvisor™ Sound Level Meter Model 831C was used to gather 19 days of background sound data (equivalent continuous sound levels, measured as LAeq) in the open bay, quiet room, sedation suite, and operating room settings. A Spartan™ Wireless Noise Dosimeter Model 730 (Larson Davis) was utilized to capture data about personal noise exposure of pediatric dental residents over 81 clinic sessions. Personal noise exposure was compared to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) stand- ard.

Results:

Background A-weighted sound pressure level was significantly less for the open bay than in the operating room, quiet room, and oral sedation setting (P<0.05), while the operating room was significantly less than the oral sedation setting (P=0.038). Personal LAeq was significantly less for the open bay than the quiet room (P=0.007) and oral sedation settings (P=0.007). There was a significantly larger percentage of time above 80 dBA captured in the oral sedation suite compared to the open bay (P=0.010) or operating room (P=0.023).

Conclusions:

Daily occupational noise exposure did not exceed the thresholds set forth by OSHA. Sedation and quiet room treatment settings were noted to be the loudest pediatric dental clinical environments.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exposição Ocupacional / Odontopediatria / Ruído Ocupacional Limite: Child / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Dent Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exposição Ocupacional / Odontopediatria / Ruído Ocupacional Limite: Child / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Dent Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article