Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Arrhythmia monitoring and outcome after myocardial infarction (BIO|GUARD-MI): a randomized trial.
Jøns, Christian; Bloch Thomsen, Poul Erik; Riahi, Sam; Smilde, Tom; Bach, Ulrich; Jacobsen, Peter Karl; Táborský, Milos; Faluközy, Jozsef; Wiemer, Marcus; Christensen, Per Dahl; Kónyi, Attila; Schelfaut, Dan; Bulava, Alan; Grabowski, Marcin; Merkely, Béla; Nuyens, Dieter; Mahajan, Rajiv; Nagel, Patrick; Tilz, Roland; Malczynski, Jerzy; Steinwender, Clemens; Brachmann, Johannes; Serota, Harvey; Schrader, Jürgen; Behrens, Steffen; Søgaard, Peter.
Afiliação
  • Jøns C; Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Bloch Thomsen PE; Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Riahi S; Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Smilde T; Department of Cardiology, Scheperziekenhuis, Treant Zorggroep, Emmen, Netherlands.
  • Bach U; Department of Cardiology, Vivantes Humboldt-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
  • Jacobsen PK; Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Táborský M; Department of Cardiology, Fakultní Nemocnice Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
  • Faluközy J; National Hospital of Cardiology, Balatonfüred, Hungary.
  • Wiemer M; Department of Cardiology, Johannes Wesling Universitätsklinik, Minden, Germany.
  • Christensen PD; Department of Cardiology, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark.
  • Kónyi A; Heart Institute, The University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
  • Schelfaut D; Cardiovascular Centre, Onze Lieve Vrouw Clinic Aalst, Aalst, Belgium.
  • Bulava A; Department of Cardiology, Ceské Budejovice Hospital and Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South Bohemia, Ceské Budejovice, Czech Republic.
  • Grabowski M; First Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Merkely B; Heart and Vascular Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Nuyens D; Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
  • Mahajan R; Department of Cardiology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Nagel P; Department of Cardiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Tilz R; Department of Cardiology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Malczynski J; Herning Hospital, Herning, Denmark.
  • Steinwender C; Department of Cardiology, Kepler University Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria.
  • Brachmann J; Department of Cardiology, Klinikum Coburg, Coburg, Germany.
  • Serota H; Department of Cardiology, St. Louis Heart and Vascular, Bridgeton, MO, United States.
  • Schrader J; Biotronik SE & Co. KG, Berlin, Germany.
  • Behrens S; Department of Cardiology, Vivantes Humboldt-Klinikum and Klinikum Spandau, Berlin, Germany.
  • Søgaard P; Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 11: 1300074, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38807948
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Cardiac arrhythmias predict poor outcome after myocardial infarction (MI). We studied if arrhythmia monitoring with an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) can improve treatment and outcome.

Design:

BIO|GUARD-MI was a randomized, international open-label study with blinded outcome assessment.

Setting:

Tertiary care facilities monitored the arrhythmias, while the follow-up remained with primary care physicians.

Participants:

Patients after ST-elevation (STEMI) or non-ST-elevation MI with an ejection fraction >35% and a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥4 (men) or ≥5 (women).

Interventions:

Patients were randomly assigned to receive or not receive an ICM in addition to standard post-MI treatment. Device-detected arrhythmias triggered immediate guideline recommended therapy changes via remote monitoring. Main outcome

measures:

MACE, defined as a composite of cardiovascular death or acute unscheduled hospitalization for cardiovascular causes.

Results:

790 patients (mean age 71 years, 72% male, 51% non-STEMI) of planned 1,400 pts were enrolled and followed for a median of 31.6 months. At 2 years, 39.4% of the device group and 6.7% of the control group had their therapy adapted for an arrhythmia [hazard ratio (HR) = 5.9, P < 0.0001]. Most frequent arrhythmias were atrial fibrillation, pauses and bradycardia. The use of an ICM did not improve outcome in the entire cohort (HR = 0.84, 95%-CI 0.65-1.10; P = 0.21). In secondary analysis, a statistically significant interaction of the type of infarction suggests a benefit in the pre-specified non-STEMI subgroup. Risk factor analysis indicates that this may be connected to the higher incidence of MACE in patients with non-STEMI.

Conclusions:

The burden of asymptomatic but actionable arrhythmias is large in post-infarction patients. However, arrhythmia monitoring with an ICM did not improve outcome in the entire cohort. Post-hoc analysis suggests that it may be beneficial in non-STEMI patients or other high-risk subgroups. Clinical Trial Registration [https//www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02341534], NCT02341534.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Cardiovasc Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Cardiovasc Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca