Arrhythmia monitoring and outcome after myocardial infarction (BIO|GUARD-MI): a randomized trial.
Front Cardiovasc Med
; 11: 1300074, 2024.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38807948
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
Cardiac arrhythmias predict poor outcome after myocardial infarction (MI). We studied if arrhythmia monitoring with an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) can improve treatment and outcome.Design:
BIO|GUARD-MI was a randomized, international open-label study with blinded outcome assessment.Setting:
Tertiary care facilities monitored the arrhythmias, while the follow-up remained with primary care physicians.Participants:
Patients after ST-elevation (STEMI) or non-ST-elevation MI with an ejection fraction >35% and a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥4 (men) or ≥5 (women).Interventions:
Patients were randomly assigned to receive or not receive an ICM in addition to standard post-MI treatment. Device-detected arrhythmias triggered immediate guideline recommended therapy changes via remote monitoring. Main outcomemeasures:
MACE, defined as a composite of cardiovascular death or acute unscheduled hospitalization for cardiovascular causes.Results:
790 patients (mean age 71 years, 72% male, 51% non-STEMI) of planned 1,400 pts were enrolled and followed for a median of 31.6 months. At 2 years, 39.4% of the device group and 6.7% of the control group had their therapy adapted for an arrhythmia [hazard ratio (HR) = 5.9, P < 0.0001]. Most frequent arrhythmias were atrial fibrillation, pauses and bradycardia. The use of an ICM did not improve outcome in the entire cohort (HR = 0.84, 95%-CI 0.65-1.10; P = 0.21). In secondary analysis, a statistically significant interaction of the type of infarction suggests a benefit in the pre-specified non-STEMI subgroup. Risk factor analysis indicates that this may be connected to the higher incidence of MACE in patients with non-STEMI.Conclusions:
The burden of asymptomatic but actionable arrhythmias is large in post-infarction patients. However, arrhythmia monitoring with an ICM did not improve outcome in the entire cohort. Post-hoc analysis suggests that it may be beneficial in non-STEMI patients or other high-risk subgroups. Clinical Trial Registration [https//www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02341534], NCT02341534.
Texto completo:
1
Bases de dados:
MEDLINE
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Front Cardiovasc Med
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Dinamarca