Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Distal Versus Proximal Arm Improvement After Paired Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy After Chronic Stroke.
Vora, Isha; Gochyyev, Perman; Engineer, Navzer; Wolf, Steven L; Kimberley, Teresa J.
Afiliação
  • Vora I; Department of Rehabilitation Science, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA.
  • Gochyyev P; Department of Rehabilitation Science, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA; Berkeley Evaluation and Assessment Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
  • Engineer N; MicroTransponder, Inc, Austin, TX.
  • Wolf SL; Division of Physical Therapy, Center for Physical Therapy and Movement Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
  • Kimberley TJ; Department of Rehabilitation Science, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA; Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA. Electronic address: tkimberley@mghihp.ed
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38815953
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate differences in upper-extremity (UE) segment-specific (proximal or distal segment) recovery after vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with UE rehabilitation (Paired-VNS) compared with rehabilitation with sham-VNS (Control). We also assessed whether gains in specific UE segments predicted clinically meaningful improvement.

DESIGN:

This study reports on a secondary analysis of Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for UE motor function after chronic ischemic stroke (VNS-REHAB), a randomized, triple-blinded, sham-controlled pivotal trial. A Rasch latent regression was used to determine differences between Paired-VNS and Controls for distal and proximal UE changes after in-clinic therapy and 3 months later. Subsequently, we ran a random forest model to assess candidate predictors of meaningful improvement. Each item of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) was evaluated as a predictor of response to treatment.

SETTING:

Nineteen stroke rehabilitation centers in the USA and UK.

PARTICIPANTS:

Dataset included 108 participants (N=108) with chronic ischemic stroke and moderate-to-severe UE impairments.

INTERVENTIONS:

Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

FMA-UE and WMFT.

RESULTS:

Distal UE improvement was significantly greater in the Paired-VNS group than in Controls immediately after therapy (95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.73; P≤.001) and after 3 months (95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.75; P=.003). Both groups showed similar improvement in proximal UE at both time points. A subset of both distal and proximal items from the FMA-UE and WMFT were predictors of meaningful improvement.

CONCLUSIONS:

Paired-VNS improved distal UE impairment in chronic stroke to a greater degree than intensive rehabilitation alone. Proximal improvements were equally responsive to either treatment. Given that meaningful UE recovery is predicted by improvements across both proximal and distal segments, Paired-VNS may facilitate improvement that is otherwise elusive.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Marrocos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Marrocos