Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Formulation of new sourdough bread prototypes fortified with non-compliant chickpea and pea residues.
Cutroneo, Sara; Petrusan, Janos-Istvan; Stolzenberger, Reiner; Zurlini, Chiara; Tedeschi, Tullia.
Afiliação
  • Cutroneo S; Food and Drug Department, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
  • Petrusan JI; Deutsches Institut für Lebensmitteltechnik e.V. (DIL), Quakenbrück, Germany.
  • Stolzenberger R; Bäckerei Reiner Stolzenberger, Bönnigheim, Germany.
  • Zurlini C; Stazione Sperimentale per l'Industria delle Conserve Alimentari, Parma, Italy.
  • Tedeschi T; Food and Drug Department, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Front Nutr ; 11: 1351443, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38933879
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Nowadays, the promotion of a circular economy is fundamental to reduce food losses and waste. In this context, the possibility of using food supply chains non-compliant residues emerges. Much interest has been directed toward legume residues, in general and, in particular, to the possibility of combining different plant-matrices to improve nutritional profile, providing high-quality products.

Methods:

Five different formulations of breads, with a combination of seeds and cereals, were fortified with chickpea and pea protein concentrates. Samples were analyzed and compared with their relative control recipe to determine differences in composition, actual protein quality and integrity, and protein digestibility (performed with the INFOGEST method).

Results:

Samples showed a clear improvement in the nutritional profile with higher values of proteins, from averagely 12.9 (control breads) to 29.6% (fortified breads) (17.7-24.7 g/100 g of dry matter respectively), and an improvement in amino acidic profile, with a better balancing of essential amino acids (lysine and sulfur amino acid contents), without affecting protein integrity. Regarding in vitro gastro-intestinal digestibility, sample C (19% chickpea proteins) showed the best results, having a comparable protein digestibility to its control bread-48.8 ± 1.1% versus 51.7 ± 2.3%, respectively.

Conclusion:

The results showed how the fortification with chickpea and/or pea protein concentrate improved the nutritional profile of bread. These prototypes seem to be a valid strategy to also increase the introduction of high biological value proteins. Furthermore, the not-expected lower digestibility suggested the possible presence of residual anti-nutritional factors in the protein concentrates interfering with protein digestibility. Therefore, it seems of fundamental importance to further investigate these aspects.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Nutr Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Nutr Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália