Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and Effectiveness of Irreversible Electroporation in Lymph Node Metastases.
Narayanan, Govindarajan; Mahendra, Ashwin M; Gentile, Nicole T; Schiro, Brian J; Gandhi, Ripal T; Peña, Constantino S; Dijkstra, Madelon.
Afiliação
  • Narayanan G; Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
  • Mahendra AM; Department of Interventional Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
  • Gentile NT; Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
  • Schiro BJ; Department of Interventional Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
  • Gandhi RT; Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
  • Peña CS; Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
  • Dijkstra M; Department of Interventional Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 47(8): 1066-1073, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38943032
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Demonstrating the safety and efficacy of percutaneous irreversible electroporation (IRE) for the treatment of lymph node metastases. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

An IRB-approved, single-center retrospective review was performed on patients with lymph node metastases gastrointestinal, and genitourinary primary cancers. Primary objective safety was evaluated by assessing complications graded according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification, and efficacy was determined by tumor response on follow-up imaging and local progression-free survival (LPFS). Secondary outcome measures were technical success (complete ablation with an adequate ablative margin > 5 mm), length of hospital stay and distant progression-free survival (DPFS).

RESULTS:

Nineteen patients underwent percutaneous IRE between June 2018 and February 2023 for lymph node metastases, close to critical structures, such as vasculature, bowel, or nerves. The technical success was achieved in all cases. Complications occurred in four patients (21.1%), including two self-limiting grade 1 hematomas, a grade 1 abdominal pain, and grade 2 nerve pain treated with medication. Seventeen patients were hospitalized overnight, one patient stayed two nights and another patient stayed fourteen nights. Median follow-up was 25.5 months. Median time to local progression was 24.1 months (95% CI 0-52.8) with 1-, 2-, and 5-year LPFS of 57.9%, 57.9% and 20.7%, respectively. Median time to distant progression was 4.3 months (95% CI 0.3-8.3) with 1-, 2-, and 5-year DPFS of 31.6%, 13.2% and 13.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

IRE is a safe and effective minimally-invasive treatment for lymph node metastases in locations, where temperature dependent ablation may be contraindicated. Care should be taken when employing IRE near nerves.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Eletroporação / Metástase Linfática Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Eletroporação / Metástase Linfática Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos