Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Design and Validation of a Novel 3D-Printed Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Trainer.
John, Jeff; Bosch, Johan; Adam, Ahmed; Fieggen, Graham; Lazarus, John; Kaestner, Lisa.
Afiliação
  • John J; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Frere Hospital and Walter Sisulu University, East London, South Africa. Electronic address: jeffveenajohn@gmail.com.
  • Bosch J; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Frere Hospital and Walter Sisulu University, East London, South Africa.
  • Adam A; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Fieggen G; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Lazarus J; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Kaestner L; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Urology ; 191: 171-176, 2024 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38944388
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To report on the design of a novel 3D-printed retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) benchtop trainer and detail its validation against real-life experiences.

METHODS:

Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) files of 2 patients with normal computed tomography of the kidney and bladder were converted into stereolithography files to create 3D triangular mesh models. These images were further refined using Autodesk Meshmixer. These 3D models were fabricated through additive manufacturing, a process commonly known as 3D printing, and assembled in a polypropylene case. After development, the model was validated by 40 experienced urologists and urology residents in their final year of training. They were asked to rate the components of the simulation using a 9-point questionnaire.

RESULTS:

The model's value in understanding the principles of RIRS and simulating contextual anatomy had mean scores of 9.43 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.74) and 9.21 (SD = 1.03), respectively. Mean scores for specific steps in RIRS were 8.07 (SD 1.47) for cannulating the ureteric orifice, 8.61 (SD 1.24) for inserting the ureteric access sheath, 9.29 (SD 0.97) for performing a renoscopy and evaluating all the calyces, 9.46 (SD 0.87) for laser lithotripsy, and 9.17 (SD 0.94) for manual stone retrieval. Participants scored the model with a mean score of 9.04 (SD 0.87) regarding realism and a mean score of 9.18 (SD 0.89) when evaluating its ability to enhance a trainee's confidence in RIRS.

CONCLUSION:

The model performed well for all components of RIRS. This model allows high fidelity of the simulation and is cost-effective, portable, durable, reusable, and compatible with standard ureteroscopes.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos / Impressão Tridimensional / Modelos Anatômicos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Urology Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos / Impressão Tridimensional / Modelos Anatômicos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Urology Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article