Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Subthreshold rejection activity in many kidney transplants currently classified as having no rejection.
Halloran, Philip F; Madill-Thomsen, Katelynn S; Böhmig, Georg; Bromberg, Jonathan; Budde, Klemens; Barner, Meagan; Mackova, Martina; Chang, Jessica; Einecke, Gunilla; Eskandary, Farsad; Gupta, Gaurav; Myslak, Marek; Viklicky, Ondrej; Akalin, Enver; Alhamad, Tarek; Anand, Sanjiv; Arnol, Miha; Baliga, Rajendra; Banasik, Miroslaw; Bingaman, Adam; Blosser, Christopher D; Brennan, Daniel; Chamienia, Andrzej; Chow, Kevin; Ciszek, Michal; de Freitas, Declan; Deborska-Materkowska, Dominika; Debska-Slizien, Alicja; Djamali, Arjang; Domanski, Leszek; Durlik, Magdalena; Fatica, Richard; Francis, Iman; Fryc, Justyna; Gill, John; Gill, Jagbir; Glyda, Maciej; Gourishankar, Sita; Grenda, Ryszard; Gryczman, Marta; Hruba, Petra; Hughes, Peter; Jittirat, Arskarapurk; Jurekovic, Zeljka; Kamal, Layla; Kamel, Mahmoud; Kant, Sam; Kasiske, Bertram; Kojc, Nika; Konopa, Joanna.
Afiliação
  • Halloran PF; Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Transplantation Immunology, University of Alberta, Canada.
  • Madill-Thomsen KS; Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Canada.
  • Böhmig G; Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
  • Bromberg J; Department of Surgery, University of Maryland, USA.
  • Budde K; Department of Nephrology, Charite-Medical University of Berlin, Germany.
  • Barner M; Kashi Clinical Laboratories, USA.
  • Mackova M; Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Canada.
  • Chang J; Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Canada.
  • Einecke G; Department of Nephrology, Medical University of Hannover, Germany.
  • Eskandary F; Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
  • Gupta G; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA.
  • Myslak M; Department of Clinical Interventions, Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation SPWSZ Hospital, Pomeranian Medical University, Poland.
  • Viklicky O; Department of Nephrology and Transplant Center, Institute for Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Czech Republic.
  • Akalin E; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, USA.
  • Alhamad T; Division of Nephrology, Washington University at St. Louis, USA.
  • Anand S; Intermountain Transplant Services, USA.
  • Arnol M; Department of Nephrology, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Baliga R; Tampa General Hospital, USA.
  • Banasik M; Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Medical University of Wroclaw, Poland.
  • Bingaman A; Department of Surgery, Methodist Transplant and Specialty Hospital, USA.
  • Blosser CD; University of Washington, USA.
  • Brennan D; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA.
  • Chamienia A; Department of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland.
  • Chow K; Department of Nephrology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia.
  • Ciszek M; Department of Immunology, Transplantology and Internal Diseases, Warsaw Medical University, Poland.
  • de Freitas D; Department of Renal Research, Manchester Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom.
  • Deborska-Materkowska D; Department of Transplantation Medicine, Warsaw Medical University, Poland.
  • Debska-Slizien A; Department of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland.
  • Djamali A; Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, USA.
  • Domanski L; Department of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University, Poland.
  • Durlik M; Department of Transplantology, Immunology, Nephrology and Internal Diseases, Warsaw Medical University, Poland.
  • Fatica R; Department of Kidney Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, USA.
  • Francis I; Henry Ford Transplant Institute, USA.
  • Fryc J; 1st Department of Nephrology and Transplantation With Dialysis Unit, Medical University in Bialystok, Poland.
  • Gill J; St. Paul's Hospital, Canada.
  • Gill J; St. Paul's Hospital, Canada.
  • Glyda M; Wojewodzki Hospital, Poland.
  • Gourishankar S; Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Transplantation Immunology, University of Alberta, Canada.
  • Grenda R; Department of Nephrology, Kidney Transplantation and Hypertension, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Poland.
  • Gryczman M; Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Pomeranian Medical University, Poland.
  • Hruba P; Department of Nephrology, Institute for Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Czech Republic.
  • Hughes P; Department of Nephrology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia.
  • Jittirat A; University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, USA.
  • Jurekovic Z; Renal Replacement Therapy, Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Merkur, Croatia.
  • Kamal L; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA.
  • Kamel M; Tampa General Hospital, USA.
  • Kant S; Division of Nephrology & Comprehensive Transplant Center, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA.
  • Kasiske B; Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Centre, USA.
  • Kojc N; Department of Pathology, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Konopa J; Department of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland.
Am J Transplant ; 2024 Aug 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39117038
ABSTRACT
Most kidney transplant patients who undergo biopsies are classified as having no rejection based on consensus thresholds. However, we hypothesized that because these patients have normal adaptive immune systems, T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) may exist as subthreshold activity in some transplants currently classified as no rejection. To examine this question, we studied genome-wide microarray results from 5086 kidney transplant biopsies (from 4170 patients). An updated molecular archetypal analysis designated 56% of biopsies as no rejection. Subthreshold molecular TCMR and/or ABMR activity molecular activity was detectable as elevated classifier scores in many biopsies classified as no rejection, with ABMR activity in many TCMR biopsies and TCMR activity in many ABMR biopsies. In biopsies classified as no rejection histologically and molecularly, molecular TCMR classifier scores correlated with increases in histologic TCMR features and molecular injury, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, and higher risk of graft loss, and molecular ABMR activity correlated with increased glomerulitis and donor-specific antibody. No rejection biopsies with high subthreshold TCMR or ABMR activity had a higher probability of having TCMR or ABMR, respectively, diagnosed in a future biopsy. We conclude that many kidney transplant recipients have unrecognized subthreshold TCMR or ABMR activity, with significant implications for future problems.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Transplant Assunto da revista: TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Transplant Assunto da revista: TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá