Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validity of estimated aortic pulse wave velocity measured during the 6-min walk test to predict anaerobic fitness before major non-cardiac surgery.
Ripollés-Melchor, J; Monge García, M I; Ruiz-Escobar, A; Sáez-Ruiz, E; Algar-Yañez, B; Abad-Motos, A; Abad-Gurumeta, A.
Afiliação
  • Ripollés-Melchor J; Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Spanish Perioperative Audit and Research Network (REDGERM), Grupo Español de Rehabilitación Multimodal (GERM), Zaragoza, Spain. Electronic address: ripo542@gmail.com.
  • Monge García MI; Departamento de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Universitario SAS de Jerez, Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, Spain.
  • Ruiz-Escobar A; Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
  • Sáez-Ruiz E; Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
  • Algar-Yañez B; Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
  • Abad-Motos A; Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Spanish Perioperative Audit and Research Network (REDGERM), Grupo Español de Rehabilitación Multimodal (GERM), Zaragoza, Spain.
  • Abad-Gurumeta A; Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Spanish Perioperative Audit and Research Network (REDGERM), Grupo Español de Rehabilitación Multimodal (GERM), Zaragoza, Spain.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39245143
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of estimated preoperative aortic pulse wave velocity (AoPWV) to discriminate between low and high 6 min walk test (6MWT) distance in patients awaiting major non-cardiac surgery.

METHODS:

Prospective observational study in 133 patients undergoing non cardiac surgery. AoPWV and the distance walked during a 6MWT were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine two different AoPWV cut-points for predicting a distance of 427 m in the 6MWT. We also calculated lower and upper AoPWV cut-points (probability ≥ 0.75) for predicting a distance of < 427 m, ≥427 m, and also 563 m in the 6MWT.

RESULTS:

The ROC curve analysis for the < 427 m distance revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.56-0.79) and an AUC of 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.61-0.83) for >563 m. Patients with AoPWV > 10.97 m/s should be considered high risk, while those with <9.42 m/s can be considered low risk.

CONCLUSIONS:

AoPWV is a simple, non-invasive, useful clinical tool for identifying and stratifying patients awaiting major non-cardiac surgery. In situations of clinical uncertainty, additional measures should be taken to assess the risk.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article