Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diffusive vs. convective therapy: effects on mediators of inflammation in patient with severe systemic inflammatory response syndrome.
Kellum, J A; Johnson, J P; Kramer, D; Palevsky, P; Brady, J J; Pinsky, M R.
Afiliação
  • Kellum JA; Department of Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA, USA.
Crit Care Med ; 26(12): 1995-2000, 1998 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9875910
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare two forms of continuous renal replacement therapy, continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) vs. continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD), in terms of the removal of inflammatory mediators from the blood of patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome and acute renal failure.

DESIGN:

Randomized crossover, clinical study.

SETTING:

University teaching hospital. PATIENTS Thirteen patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome and acute renal failure receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. INTERVENTION Patients were randomized to receive either convective clearance using CVVH or diffusive clearance using CVVHD for the first 24 hrs, followed by the other modality for 24 hrs. All treatments utilized AN69 hemofilters. CVVH was performed with an ultrafiltration rate of 2 L/hr and CVVHD with a dialysis outflow rate of 2 L/hr. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

Plasma and ultrafiltrate concentrations of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, and sL-selectin were measured at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hrs by radioimmunoassay. Plasma endotoxin concentrations were also measured at 0, 12, and 24 hrs by chromogenic assay. CVVH was associated with a 13% decrease in plasma TNF-alpha concentrations compared with a 23% increase while on CVVHD (p < .05). Mean plasma concentrations of IL-6, IL-10, and sL-selectin were unchanged over time and between therapies. Only minimal amounts of mediators were recovered in the effluents with either therapy except for IL-6. The clearances for IL-6 were different between therapies, 1.9+/-0.8 (SD) mL/min for CVVHD and 3.3+/-1.5 mL/min for CVVH, (p< .01). Plasma endotoxin concentrations were not different between therapies.

CONCLUSION:

CVVH resulted in a decrease in plasma TNF-alpha concentrations as compared with CVVHD, while the type of transport mechanism used did not influence plasma concentrations of IL-6, IL-10, soluble L-selectin, or endotoxin. Differences in clearance for IL-6 between CVVH and CVVHD did not translate into significant changes in circulating IL-6 concentrations.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hemofiltração / Hemodiafiltração / Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica / Injúria Renal Aguda Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Med Ano de publicação: 1998 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
Buscar no Google
Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hemofiltração / Hemodiafiltração / Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica / Injúria Renal Aguda Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Med Ano de publicação: 1998 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos