The role of endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in human papillomavirus positive patients.

BACKGROUND: The role of endocervical curettage (ECC) in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is a controversial topic. OBJECTIVES: Investigate the role of ECC in the diagnosis of CIN in human papillomavirus (HPV) positive patients. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: A tertiary training and research hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included patients who were referred for colposcopy between 2018-2022 because of abnormal screening results. ECC results, age, cytology, HPV status, and colposcopic impression of the patients were extracted from the medical records. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors that could predict CIN on ECC. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: The likelihood of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in ECC in patients with cervical biopsy results of normal and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL). SAMPLE SIZE: 2895 women. RESULTS: In patients with normal and LSIL cervical biopsy results, HSILs were detected in 6.7% of ECC results. There was no difference in the detection rates of CIN in ECC among groups with smear results negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancy (NILM), atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), and LSIL. The likelihood of HSIL being observed in ECC was 2.2 times higher in patients with HPV16. The probability of LSIL disanois was 2.3 times higher in women aged 50-59 years and 2.8 times higher in women ≥ 60 years compared to the reference group of <30 years. The probability of LSIL was 2.3 and HSIL by ECC was 2.2 times higher in both age categories (P<.012 and P=.032, respectively) than the reference group of <30 years. CONCLUSION: Regardless of colposcopic findings, ECC should be performed in patients with smear results of NILM who are positive for HPV16, in patients with smear results of ASC-US and LSIL who are positive for any oncogenic type of HPV and in patients 50 and above with any result of smear or any oncogenic HPV type. LIMITATIONS: We did not have the components of the HPV types in mixed groups.

Diagnosis Rates Through Cancer Screening Programs in Patients with Breast Carcinoma.

AIM: This study investigated whether breast cancer patients had ever applied for Cancer Early Diagnosis Screening and Training Centers (KETEM). METHOD: This study, conducted from November 2020 to April 2021, adopts a cross-sectional research design and is planned as a survey study. The "Diagnosis Rates with Screening Programs in Breast Cancer Patients" survey was conducted on women over 45 who were diagnosed with breast cancer in the Medical Oncology Clinic of Izmir Katip Çelebi University Atatürk Education and Research Hospital. Further information about the cancer stage was gathered from the Medical Oncology outpatient clinic file records. Data obtained in the study were evaluated using the the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 26.0 software (IBM Corp.; Armonk, NY, USA), using the number, percentage distribution, arithmetic mean, and chi-square test methods. RESULTS: It has been determined that most patients diagnosed did not receive a diagnosis through screening programs, were not aware of KETEM, and did not apply to KETEM. A positive relationship was found between the level of education and participation in screening programs. It was observed that women who knew about the KETEM's participated more often in the scans. CONCLUSION: The study discovered a lack of knowledge and inadequacy in screening programs for patients with breast cancer. We believe that it is essential to introduce and disseminate KETEMs so that cancers can be detected early through screening.