RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the presence of subfoveal hyperreflective dots (SfHD) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in macular holes (MH) and establish whether there is a relationship with postoperative anatomical and functional outcomes. METHODS: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted at the Dr. Elías Santana Hospital. Sixty-eight eyes of 67 patients with a tomographic diagnosis of full-thickness MH who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling were included. Preoperative and postoperative measurements were obtained using radial macular scans and HD raster scans with Optovue and Cirrus 5000 (Zeiss) OCT machines. The main outcome measures were anatomical closure by OCT and functional outcome through best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). RESULTS: The anatomical closure rate in our study was 63%. MHs that failed to achieve anatomical closure exhibited a higher number of hyperreflective dots and worse postoperative BCVA. A statistically significant association was found between exposed retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in microns and the number of SfHD (Pâ¯=â¯.001). CONCLUSION: SfHD is a common tomographic finding in MH, and the presence of a higher number of these points is associated with poorer anatomical and functional outcomes. This imaging finding is a potential prognostic biomarker in this pathology.
Assuntos
Perfurações Retinianas , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Acuidade Visual , Vitrectomia , Humanos , Perfurações Retinianas/cirurgia , Perfurações Retinianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Transversais , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Prognóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fóvea Central/diagnóstico por imagem , Fóvea Central/patologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores , Epitélio Pigmentado da Retina/patologia , Epitélio Pigmentado da Retina/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
GENERAL OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy and validity of images with smartphone compared to the RetCam® system for the diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). METHODOLOGY: Observational, longitudinal and masked study carried out at the Dr. Elías Santana hospital. Infants with birth weight ≤1500 g, gestational age ≤30 weeks and/or patients exposed to risk factors or complications linked to ROP were included. These subjects were screened using images with smartphone or RetCam®, both compared to conventional fundoscopy. The ICROP classification was used for staging. The main results analyzed were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values and kappa index. RESULTS: 915 images (n = 121) were obtained, distributed in smartphone group (50.4%) and RetCam® group (49.6%) between August 2020 and March 2021. Subjects with ROP had lower gestational age (30.2 sem ± 2.8), birth weight (1361 g ± 398), and greater exposure to oxygen therapy (12.8 days ± 11.3). The RetCam® group presented sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 78%, positive predictive value = 90% and kappa index = 0.70. The smartphone group presented sensitivity = 88%, specificity = 90%, positive predictive value = 93.75% and kappa index = 0.81. CONCLUSIONS: Both diagnostic methods were accurate to identify ROP. The smartphone group obtained superior results with excellent resolution, representing a cost-effective method to create a global impact on reducing preventable blindness in the pediatric population.
Assuntos
Retinopatia da Prematuridade , Telemedicina , Peso ao Nascer , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Oftalmoscopia/métodos , Oxigênio , Retinopatia da Prematuridade/diagnósticoRESUMO
Objetivo general Evaluar la precisión y validez de imágenes vía teléfono inteligente en comparación con el sistema RetCam® para el diagnóstico de retinopatía del prematuro (ROP). Metodología Estudio observacional, de corte longitudinal y enmascarado realizado en el hospital Dr. Elías Santana. Se incluyeron infantes con peso al nacer ≤ 1.500 g, edad gestacional ≤ 30 semanas y/o pacientes expuestos a factores de riesgo o complicaciones ligadas a ROP. Estos sujetos fueron tamizados empleando imágenes vía teléfono inteligente o RetCam®, ambos comparados con la fondoscopía convencional. Se utilizó la clasificación de ICROP para la estadificación. Los resultados principales analizados fueron sensibilidad, especificidad, valores predictivos e índice kappa. Resultados Se obtuvieron 915 imágenes (n = 121), distribuidas en grupo teléfono inteligente (50,4%) y grupo RetCam® (49,6%) entre agosto del 2020 y marzo del 2021. Los sujetos que presentaron ROP tuvieron menor edad gestacional (30,2 sem ± 2.8), peso al nacer (1.361 g ± 398) y mayor exposición a oxigenoterapia (12,8 días ± 11,3). El grupo RetCam® presentó sensibilidad = 80%, especificidad = 78%, valor predictivo positivo = 90% e índice kappa = 0,70. El grupo teléfono inteligente presentó sensibilidad = 88%, especificidad = 90%, valor predictivo positivo = 93,75% e índice kappa = 0,81. Conclusiones Ambos métodos diagnósticos fueron precisos para identificar ROP. El grupo teléfono inteligente obtuvo resultados superiores con una excelente resolución, representando un método costo-efectivo para crear un impacto global en la reducción de la ceguera prevenible en población pediátrica (AU)
General objective To evaluate the accuracy and validity of images with smartphone compared to the RetCam® system for the diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Methodology Observational, longitudinal and masked study carried out at the Dr. Elías Santana hospital. Infants with birth weight ≤ 1500 g, gestational age ≤ 30 weeks and/or patients exposed to risk factors or complications linked to ROP were included. These subjects were screened using images with smartphone or RetCam®, both compared to conventional fundoscopy. The ICROP classification was used for staging. The main results analyzed were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values and kappa index. Results 915 images (n = 121) were obtained, distributed in smartphone group (50.4%) and RetCam® group (49.6%) between August 2020 and March 2021. Subjects with ROP had lower gestational age (30.2 sem ± 2.8), birth weight (1361 g ± 398), and greater exposure to oxygen therapy (12.8 days ± 11.3). The RetCam® group presented sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 78%, positive predictive value = 90% and kappa index = 0.70. The smartphone group presented sensitivity = 88%, specificity = 90%, positive predictive value = 93.75% and kappa index = 0.81. Conclusions Both diagnostic methods were accurate to identify ROP. The smartphone group obtained superior results with excellent resolution, representing a cost-effective method to create a global impact on reducing preventable blindness in the pediatric population (AU)