Factors affecting perceived caregiver burden: caregivers of trauma patients discharged from the intensive care unit.

Background: Caregivers to intensive care unit survivors are vulnerable to caregiver burden, which has been demonstrated to have consequences to patients' and caregivers' mental and physical health. Potentially modifiable factors should be explored so that interventions may be developed. Methods: Ninety-one anticipated caregivers were prospectively assessed both at a southwestern trauma intensive care unit during their patient's admission and at home via remote interview 3 months after intensive care unit admission. Caregiver depression, posttraumatic stress symptoms, experiences, and perceived burden were assessed. Results: At follow up, there was a significant negative correlation between caregiver burden and understanding of their patient's condition (P < 0.001) and intensive care unit events (P = 0.008). Caregivers with lower understanding of their patient's injury/illness had significantly greater depressive symptoms (P = 0.04). Conclusions: Education and knowledge of intensive care unit events regarding their patient may influence perceived burden among caregivers. Interventions to orient caregivers to intensive care unit events are suggested to reduce caregiver and healthcare system burden.

Prolonged exposure for posttraumatic stress disorder following spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Individuals with a spinal cord injury (SCI) may experience posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) at a higher rate, which is associated with worse psychiatric comorbidity, decreased quality of life, and greater disability. Yet, effective PTSD interventions remain understudied for individuals with SCI. We conducted the first randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an evidence-based psychotherapy (prolonged exposure [PE]) with survivors of SCI during acute rehabilitation. We examined the efficacy, feasibility, and secondary outcomes. RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: Participants (n = 29) were adults recruited from 2018 to 2021 1-month postinjury with PTSD randomized into either PE therapy or treatment as usual. The primary outcome was PTSD assessed at baseline, 6, 10, and 32 weeks postenrollment. RESULTS: An overall group-by-time interaction was not statistically significant (p = .102), but effect sizes demonstrated moderate and large improvements in PTSD for the PE group at 6 (-19.4 vs. -9.7) and 10 (-25.8 vs. -5.7), respectively. Similarly, moderate to large effect sizes were observed for depression, maladaptive posttraumatic cognitions, disruptive nocturnal behaviors, SCI-related quality of life, and risky alcohol consumption. Low rates of enrollment (50%) and treatment completion (25%) suggest feasibility challenges; however, treatment completers did report high satisfaction (100%). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Results suggest that individuals who received PE had a quicker and clinically meaningful reduction in PTSD symptoms, but delivery during acute rehabilitation is not feasible for many individuals. Future research should examine abbreviated versions of PE for PTSD to enhance the feasibility of treatment in this setting. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Strategies and lessons learned from a longitudinal study to maximize recruitment in the midst of a global pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted many usual processes for recruiting and enrolling research participants. We present our experience with electronic recruitment in a survey study investigating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health. Adults (≥18 years) in communities served by Baylor Scott and White Health (BSWH) were recruited via patient portal messages sent to BSWH patients with confirmed/suspected COVID-19 as part of the "COVID-19 Digital Care Journey"; BSWH social media posts; other media; referral from other BSWH COVID-19 studies; and internal BSWH communications. Of 1279 enrolled participants, 996 (77.87%) were recruited via the Digital Care Journey and 124 (9.7%) via internal communications. The remaining strategies contributed <5% each. Social media and internal communications recruited larger proportions of those aged 18 to 34 and those with advanced degrees; other media, more racially diverse participants; and the Digital Care Journey and referral from other studies, predominantly participants positive for COVID-19. In terms of volume, the COVID-19 Digital Care Journey was the most successful strategy, particularly for individuals who had COVID-19. However, its dominance contributed to the overrepresentation of white, educated, and female participants. Thus, supplemental strategies to reach individuals not enrolled/engaging with the portal are necessary to achieve representativeness.

Prolonged exposure therapy for PTSD among spinal cord injury survivors: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

The National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center estimates 294,000 people in the US live with a spinal cord injury (SCI), with approximately 17,810 new cases each year. Although the physical outcomes associated with SCI have been widely studied, the psychological consequences of sustaining a SCI remain largely unexplored. Scant research has focused on posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in this population, despite prevalence estimates suggesting that up to 60% of individuals with SCI experience PTSD post-injury, compared to only 7% of the general US population. Fortunately, prolonged exposure therapy (PE) is a well-researched and highly effective treatment for PTSD. However, no trauma focused exposure-based therapy for PTSD (e.g. PE) has not yet been tested in a SCI population. Thus, we aim to conduct the first test of an evidence-based intervention for PTSD among patients with SCI. Adults with SCI and PTSD (N = 60) will be randomly assigned to either: (1) 12-sessions of PE (2-3 sessions per week) or (2) a treatment as usual (TAU) control group who will receive the standard inpatient rehabilitation care for SCI patients. Primary outcomes will be assessed at 0, 6, 10, and 32 weeks.

Nonpharmacologic Pain Management Among Hospitalized Inpatients: A Randomized Waitlist-Controlled Trial of Standard Virtual Reality (CGI VR) Versus Video Capture VR (360 degrees 3D/Stereoscopic Video Capture VR).

OBJECTIVES: Nonpharmacologic pain management strategies are needed because of the growing opioid epidemic. While studies have examined the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) for pain reduction, there is little research in adult inpatient settings, and no studies comparing the relative efficacy of standard animated computer-generated imagery (CGI) VR to Video Capture VR (360 degrees 3D/stereoscopic Video Capture VR). Here, we report on a randomized controlled trial of the relative efficacy of standard CGI VR versus Video Capture VR (matched for content) and also compared the overall efficacy of VR to a waitlist control group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants (N=103 hospitalized inpatients reporting pain) were randomized to 1 of 3 conditions: (1) waitlist control, (2) CGI VR, or (3) Video Capture VR. The VR and waitlist conditions were 10 minutes in length. Outcomes were assessed pretreatment, post-treatment, and after a brief follow-up. RESULTS: Consistent with hypotheses, both VR conditions reduced pain significantly more relative to the waitlist control condition (d=1.60, P<0.001) and pain reductions were largely maintained at the brief follow-up assessment. Both VR conditions reduced pain by ∼50% and led to improvements in mood, anxiety, and relaxation. Contrary to prediction, the Video Capture VR condition was not significantly more effective at reducing pain relative to the CGI VR condition (d=0.25, P=0.216). However, as expected, patients randomized to the Video Capture VR rated their experience as more positive and realistic (d=0.78, P=0.002). DISCUSSION: Video Capture VR was as effective as CGI VR for pain reduction and was rated as more realistic.