Striatal networks for tinnitus treatment targeting.

Neuromodulation treatment effect size for bothersome tinnitus may be larger and more predictable by adopting a target selection approach guided by personalized striatal networks or functional connectivity maps. Several corticostriatal mechanisms are likely to play a role in tinnitus, including the dorsal/ventral striatum and the putamen. We examined whether significant tinnitus treatment response by deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the caudate nucleus may be related to striatal network increased functional connectivity with tinnitus networks that involve the auditory cortex or ventral cerebellum. The first study was a cross-sectional 2-by-2 factorial design (tinnitus, no tinnitus; hearing loss, normal hearing, n = 68) to define cohort level abnormal functional connectivity maps using high-field 7.0 T resting-state fMRI. The second study was a pilot case-control series (n = 2) to examine whether tinnitus modulation response to caudate tail subdivision stimulation would be contingent on individual level striatal connectivity map relationships with tinnitus networks. Resting-state fMRI identified five caudate subdivisions with abnormal cohort level functional connectivity maps. Of those, two connectivity maps exhibited increased connectivity with tinnitus networks-dorsal caudate head with Heschl's gyrus and caudate tail with the ventral cerebellum. DBS of the caudate tail in the case-series responder resulted in dramatic reductions in tinnitus severity and loudness, in contrast to the nonresponder who showed no tinnitus modulation. The individual level connectivity map of the responder was in alignment with the cohort expectation connectivity map, where the caudate tail exhibited increased connectivity with tinnitus networks, whereas the nonresponder individual level connectivity map did not.

Trends in Management of Ménière Disease: A TriNetX Network Database Analysis.

This study investigated management practices for Meniere's disease (MD) and their temporal trends from 2008 to 2022 within the TriNetX network database. Study cohort included adult patients (≥18 years) with the diagnosis of MD from TriNetX's multi-institutional medical records (n = 77,493). MD diagnosis and management were queried based on the international classification of diseases, tenth revision, current procedural terminology, and RXNorm codes. Temporal trends were analyzed using joinpoint regression. There was significant increase in rates of relevant medications prescribed within 12 months of MD diagnosis from 2008 to 2022 (annual percent change [APC]: 1.2 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.4-1.9]). There were no significant changes in rate of intratympanic injection within 12 months of MD diagnosis (1.7 [95% CI: -1.1 to 4.5]). Rate of endolymphatic sac surgery and labyrinthectomy any time after MD diagnosis gradually decreased from 2008 to 2022 at APC of -8.1 (95% CI: -11.8 to -4.2) and -11.0 (95% CI: -14.0 to -7.7), respectively. Use of relevant medications has significantly increased during the early management of MD and the overall use of surgical treatments has decreased.

Cerumen impaction: Prevalence and associated factors in the United States population.

Objective: To examine the prevalence of cerumen impaction in a nationally representative sample of the US population and the association of cerumen impaction with sociodemographic factors, hearing loss, and tinnitus. Methods: The cohort included 14,230 individuals aged ≥12 years who completed otoscopy and audiometry in NHANES (2005-2016). Cerumen impaction (partial/complete) was determined by otoscopy. Hearing level was defined by speech-frequency pure-tone average (PTA). Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with cerumen impaction. Results: The prevalence of any cerumen impaction was 18.6% [95% CI: 17.3%-19.9%] among individuals ≥12 years and 32.4% [29.9%-35.1%] among those ≥70 years. The prevalence of bilateral partial and complete cerumen impaction was 6.3% [5.6%-7.1%] and 1.2% [1.0%-1.9%], respectively. Any cerumen impaction was associated with male sex (OR 1.77 [1.5-2.1]), identifying as Black race (vs. Caucasian, OR: 1.78 [1.5-2.9]), lower level of education (OR: 0.84 [0.71-0.98]), and older age (OR: 1.02 [1.01-1.03]). After adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors, complete impaction was associated with increased PTA (right ear: ß = 4.1 dB [2.4-5.8 dB], left ear: ß = 1.9 dB [0.46-3.4 dB]), but not with tinnitus. Conclusions: Cerumen impaction is highly prevalent in the US population, especially among older adults, and has disproportionate sociodemographic impacts. Complete impaction is associated with a small, statistically significant elevation in PTA, but there is no association with tinnitus. These findings emphasize the need to implement and disseminate best practices for ear hygiene and cerumen management broadly and equitably. Level of Evidence: 2B.

Magnetic Resonancy Imaging Safety in Active Osseointegrated (Osia®) and Cochlear Implants: New Technology Creating Confusion.

OBJECTIVE: There is increased confusion regarding MRI-compatible CIs and BAHAs. This report describes two cases when patients underwent MRIs with non-MRI compatible devices. RESULTS: One patient with bilateral Cochlear Osias experienced dislocation of both internal magnets after 1.5 Tesla MRI. Both magnets were outside the silastic sheath, with the left magnet flipped. A second patient with a legacy CI experienced similar internal magnet dislocation and inversion after 3 Tesla MRI. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes internal magnet dislocation/inversion with the Cochlear Osia and a legacy CI after MRI. Our findings suggest the need for improved patient education and simplified radiology guidelines. Laryngoscope, 134:393-396, 2024.

Association of Sleep Characteristics with Tinnitus and Hearing Loss.

Objective: The impact of poor sleep on tinnitus has been mainly attributed to central processes. There is an association between sleep disorders and hearing loss, but whether hearing levels mediate the association between sleep disorders and tinnitus is unknown. This study investigates the association between sleep characteristics, tinnitus, and hearing loss. Study Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Methods: Study cohort includes 9693 adults (≥20 years) from the NHANES 2005 to 2018 who completed audiometric testing and questionnaires on tinnitus and sleep characteristics. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to quantify associations between sleep characteristics, tinnitus, and hearing loss. Results: In this cohort, 29% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28%-31%) reported trouble sleeping and 9% (95% CI: 8%-10%) reported being diagnosed with sleep disorders. Negative sleep characteristics (less hours of sleep, diagnosis of a sleep disorder, trouble sleeping, or OSA symptoms) were not associated with audiometry-measured hearing loss in multivariable models adjusted for demographics and comorbidities but were significantly associated with bothersome tinnitus. This association remained significant without substantial attenuation in multivariable models additionally adjusting for hearing levels: sleeping <8 h/day (vs ≥8) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.28 [95% CI: 1.08-1.52]), trouble sleeping (OR: 1.78 [95% CI: 1.45-2.19]), diagnosis of sleep disorders (OR: 1.57 [95% CI: 1.14-2.15]), and report of OSA symptoms (OR: 1.42 [95% CI: 1.08-1.88]). Conclusion: Negative sleep characteristics were associated with tinnitus while there was no clinically meaningful association between sleep and hearing loss. Our findings suggest that the relationship between poor sleep and tinnitus is likely contributed by central processes without a major role of mediation via the peripheral auditory system.

Association of Symptomatic Dizziness With All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality.

Importance: Dizziness is a highly prevalent complaint with wide-ranging causes and resultant morbidity. Whether symptomatic dizziness and its various manifestations are associated with all-cause and cause-specific mortality is unknown. Objective: To examine the associations of symptomatic dizziness and its manifestations with all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study is a mortality follow-up study based on the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The study cohort included adults 40 years and older who completed questions about symptomatic dizziness, including problems with dizziness, balance, falling, and positional dizziness, within the past 12 months. Respondents were linked to mortality data through December 31, 2019. Data were analyzed from February to August 2023. Exposure: Self-reported symptomatic dizziness. Main Outcomes and Measures: All-cause and cause-specific (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer, and unintentional injuries) mortality. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to examine associations between symptomatic dizziness and all-cause and cause-specific mortality while adjusting for demographics and medical history. Results: In this nationally representative cohort of 9000 middle-aged and older US adults (mean [SD] age, 61.8 [13.8] years; 4570 [50.8%] female), prevalence of symptomatic dizziness was 23.8%. Specifically, 18.3% reported problems with dizziness, 14.5% reported problems with balance, 5.7% reported problems with falling, and 3.8% reported dizziness when turning in bed (positional dizziness). At a median (range) of 16.2 (0.1-20.6) years of follow-up, all-cause mortality for adults with symptomatic dizziness was higher than for those without (45.6% vs 27.1%). Symptomatic dizziness was associated with elevated risk for cause-specific mortality from diabetes (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; 95% CI, 1.23-2.25), cardiovascular disease (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.12-1.55), and cancer (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.99-1.47) but not unintentional injuries (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.51-1.88). Reporting problems with balance or falling was associated with increased all-cause mortality (balance: HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.17-1.39; and falling: HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.33-1.73), cardiovascular disease-specific mortality (balance: HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.20-1.66; and falling: HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.15-1.94), and diabetes-specific mortality risks (balance: HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.26-2.39; and falling: HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.26-3.18). There was no association between positional dizziness and mortality (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.82-1.19). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, symptomatic dizziness was associated with increased risk for all-cause and diabetes-, cardiovascular disease-, and cancer-specific mortality. The imprecision of the effect size estimate for cancer-specific mortality prevents making a definitive conclusion. Future studies are needed to determine whether symptomatic dizziness indicates underlying health conditions contributing to mortality or if early intervention for imbalance and falls can reduce mortality risk.

Association between hearing aid use and mortality in adults with hearing loss in the USA: a mortality follow-up study of a cross-sectional cohort.

BACKGROUND: Hearing loss has been identified as an independent risk factor for negative health outcomes and mortality. However, whether rehabilitation with hearing aid use is associated with lower mortality is currently unknown. This study aimed to examine the associations of hearing loss, hearing aid use, and mortality in the USA. METHODS: In this cross-sectional, follow-up study, we assessed 9885 adults (age 20 years and older) who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 1999 and 2012 and completed audiometry and hearing aid use questionnaires (1863 adults with hearing loss). Main measures included hearing loss (speech-frequency pure-tone average) and hearing aid use (never users, non-regular users, and regular users). Mortality status of the cohort was linked to the National Death Index up to Dec 31, 2019. Cox proportional regression models were used to examine the association between hearing loss, hearing aid use, and mortality while adjusting for demographics and medical history. FINDINGS: The cohort consisted of 9885 participants, of which 5037 (51·0%) were female and 4848 (49·0%) were male with a mean age of 48·6 years (SD 18·1) at baseline. The weighted prevalence of audiometry-measured hearing loss was 14·7% (95% CI 13·3-16·3%) and the all-cause mortality rate was 13·2% (12·1-14·4) at a median 10·4 years of follow-up (range 0·1-20·8). The rate of regular hearing aid use among adults with hearing loss was 12·7% (95% CI 10·6-15·1). Hearing loss was an independent risk factor associated with higher mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1·40 [95% CI 1·21-1·62]). Among individuals with hearing loss, the adjusted mortality risk was lower among regular hearing aid users in comparison with never users (adjusted HR 0·76 [0·60-0·95]) accounting for demographics, hearing levels, and medical history. There was no difference in adjusted mortality between non-regular hearing aid users and never users (adjusted HR 0·93 [0·70-1·24]). INTERPRETATION: Regular hearing aid use was associated with lower risks of mortality than in never users in US adults with hearing loss when accounting for age, hearing loss, and other potential confounders. Future research is needed to investigate the potential protective role of hearing aid use against mortality for adults with hearing loss. FUNDING: None.

Development of a feline model for preclinical research of a new translabyrinthine auditory nerve implant.

Cochlear implants are among the most successful neural prosthetic devices to date but exhibit poor frequency selectivity and the inability to consistently activate apical (low frequency) spiral ganglion neurons. These issues can limit hearing performance in many cochlear implant patients, especially for understanding speech in noisy environments and in perceiving or appreciating more complex inputs such as music and multiple talkers. For cochlear implants, electrical current must pass through the bony wall of the cochlea, leading to widespread activation of auditory nerve fibers. Cochlear implants also cannot be implanted in some individuals with an obstruction or severe malformations of the cochlea. Alternatively, intraneural stimulation delivered via an auditory nerve implant could provide direct contact with neural fibers and thus reduce unwanted current spread. More confined current during stimulation can increase selectivity of frequency fiber activation. Furthermore, devices such as the Utah Slanted Electrode Array can provide access to the full cross section of the auditory nerve, including low frequency fibers that are difficult to reach using a cochlear implant. However, further scientific and preclinical research of these Utah Slanted Electrode Array devices is limited by the lack of a chronic large animal model for the auditory nerve implant, especially one that leverages an appropriate surgical approach relevant for human translation. This paper presents a newly developed transbullar translabyrinthine surgical approach for implanting the auditory nerve implant into the cat auditory nerve. In our first of a series of studies, we demonstrate a surgical approach in non-recovery experiments that enables implantation of the auditory nerve implant into the auditory nerve, without damaging the device and enabling effective activation of the auditory nerve fibers, as measured by electrode impedances and electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses. These positive results motivate performing future chronic cat studies to assess the long-term stability and function of these auditory nerve implant devices, as well as development of novel stimulation strategies that can be translated to human patients.

Guiding Patients Through Decision-Making in Management of Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma.

Decision-making in management of sporadic vestibular schwannoma aims to identify the most appropriate options based on tumor characteristics, symptoms, health, and goals for each patient. Advances in knowledge of tumor natural history, improvements in radiation techniques, and achievements in neurologic preservation with microsurgery have shifted emphasis toward maximizing quality of life using a personalized approach. To empower patients to make informed decisions, we present a framework to help match patient values and priorities with reasonable expectations from modern management options. Introduced herein are practical examples of communication strategies and decision aids to support shared decision-making in modern practice.

Use of Physical Therapy and Subsequent Falls Among Patients With Dizziness in the US.

Importance: Among adults who present for clinical evaluation of dizziness, there is a critical need to identify interventions, such as physical therapy (PT), to mitigate the risk of falls over time. Objective: The primary objective was to examine the association between receipt of PT and falls requiring medical care within 12 months of presentation for dizziness. Secondary objectives included identification of factors associated with falls requiring medical care and factors associated with receipt of PT after presentation for dizziness. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study examined US commercial insurance and Medicare Advantage claims from January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2015. In all, 805 454 patients 18 years or older with a new diagnosis of symptomatic dizziness or vestibular disorders were identified. Data were analyzed from October 1, 2021, to February 1, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Receipt of PT services and the incidence of falls requiring medical care were measured. The association between receipt of PT and falls that occurred 12 months after presentation for dizziness was estimated after accounting for presentation setting (outpatient clinic or emergency department), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; with higher scores indicating greater morbidity), diagnosis code, and sociodemographic characteristics. Results: A total of 805 454 patients presented for dizziness from 2006 through 2015 (median [range] age, 52 [18-87] years; 502 055 females [62%]). Of these patients, 45 771 (6%) received PT within 3 months of presentation for dizziness and 60 060 (7%) experienced a fall resulting in a medical encounter within 12 months after presentation for dizziness. In adjusted models, patients least likely to receive PT were female (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.78-0.81), those aged 50 to 59 years (AOR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.65-0.70] compared with patients aged 18-39 years), and those with more comorbidities (AOR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.70-0.73] for CCI ≥ 2 vs 0). Receipt of PT services within 3 months of presentation for dizziness was associated with a reduced risk of falls over the subsequent 12 months, with the greatest risk reduction found within 3 months after PT (AOR, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.14-0.15] at 3-12 months vs 0.18 [95% CI, 0.18-0.19] at 6-12 months and 0.23 [95% CI, 0.23-0.24] at 9-12 months). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cohort study suggest that receipt of PT after presentation for dizziness was associated with a reduction in fall risk during the subsequent 12 months; thus, timely PT referral for dizziness may be beneficial for these patients. Future research, ideally with a clinical trial design, is needed to explore the independent impact of PT on subsequent falls for adults with dizziness.

Nationwide Utilization of Computerized Dynamic Posturography in an Era of Deimplementation.

Computerized dynamic posturography (CDP) provides multisensory assessment of balance. Consensus is lacking regarding CDP utility and coverage determinations vary. To inform best practices and policy, this cross-sectional study quantifies provider use of CDP among Medicare beneficiaries over time (2012-2017), by geographic region (hospital referral region [HRR]), and specialty. We observed 195,267 beneficiaries underwent 212,847 CDP tests totaling $15,780,001 in payments. Number of CDPs billed per 100,000 beneficiaries varied 534-fold across HRRs. Over 6 years, CDP use grew by 84% despite stagnant reimbursement. More utilization was attributable to primary care clinicians than specialties focused on care for dizziness and balance disorders. The observed growth and variation illustrate the potential for policy and provider preferences to drive unexpected practice patterns and underscore the need to engage a broad network of providers to develop optimal guidelines for use. CDP may offer a use case for deimplementation of low-value diagnostic services.

Modern Management of Complex Tympanojugular Paragangliomas: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Tympanojugular paragangliomas (TJPs) are slow-growing tumors arising within the middle ear or jugular foramen. The development of modified skull base approaches and the increasing use of stereotactic radiosurgery have provided more modern techniques in the management of TJPs. Several factors dictating approach selection, and resulting clinical outcomes have been inconsistently described. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature describing modern management of complex TJPs was performed and summarized. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to describe the rate of tumor control, complications, and symptom improvement in patients undergoing radiosurgery or surgical resection. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were identified with a total of 852 TJP patients. A minority (153 patients) underwent radiosurgery while 699 underwent surgery. On meta-analysis, there was a 3.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5%-6.4%) tumor growth rate following radiosurgery and 3.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8%-6.0%) recurrence rate in surgical resection, with no significant moderator effect between the 2 groups (P = 0.9046). Complication rate for radiosurgery was 7.6% (95% CI: 2.8%-12.4%), differing significantly from surgical complication rates of 29.6% (95% CI: 17.1-42.0%, P = 0.0418). CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic radiosurgery and surgical resection for TJPs have similar rates of tumor recurrence. Radiation is associated with less risk and lower morbidity, yet there is comparably modest reduction of the tumor size. In sum, the data suggest that radiosurgery is a reasonable management option for patients with minimal symptoms who are high risk for surgery. Microsurgical resection should be reserved for patients with lower cranial neuropathies or those who have failed radiation treatment.

Neurotology Workforce in the United States: Gender Diversity and Geographic Distribution.

OBJECTIVE: The workforce of neurotology has changed with increasing numbers of accredited programs and diverse representation among trainees over the past several decades. This study aims to describe the characteristics, density, and geographic variation of the current neurotology workforce in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: American Board of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery portal and online search. METHODS: The study cohort included physicians certified in Neurotology by the American Board of Otolaryngology as of 2021 (n = 372). Physician characteristics including years of practice, gender, practice setting, and location were collected. Geographic variation analysis was performed by the state, county, and hospital referral region. Associations between the number of neurotologists per population and socioeconomic characteristics were assessed using multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 372 neurotologists, 65% practiced in academic settings and 13% were female. The percentage of female neurotologists increased from 0% among neurotologists with ≥30 years of practice to 23% among <10 years of practice. There were no differences in a practice setting by gender. The geographical analysis demonstrated that the average number of neurotologists was 1.1 per 1 million Americans. In a multivariable model, the density of neurotologists was significantly higher within counties with the highest quartiles of college education (ß = .6 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.3-0.8]) and income (ß = .3 [95% CI: 0.1-0.6]). CONCLUSION: The number of board-certified neurotologists has gradually increased and there have been trends toward greater gender diversity. The geographical distribution of neurotology practice was concentrated in counties with higher socioeconomic status as expected given the referral-based nature of the subspecialty. There should be efforts to reach out to low socioeconomic communities to ensure equivalent access to neurotological care.

Machine Learning Prediction of Objective Hearing Loss With Demographics, Clinical Factors, and Subjective Hearing Status.

OBJECTIVE: Hearing loss (HL) is highly prevalent, yet underrecognized and underdiagnosed. Lack of standardized screening, awareness, cost, and access to hearing testing present barriers to HL identification. To facilitate prescreening and selection of patients who warrant audiometric evaluation, we developed a machine learning (ML) model to predict speech-frequency pure-tone average (PTA). STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). METHODS: The cohort included 8918 adults (≥20 years) who completed audiometric testing with NHANES (2012-2018). The primary outcome measure was the prediction of better hearing ear speech-frequency PTA. Relevant predictors included demographics, medical conditions, and subjective assessment of hearing. Supervised ML with a tree-based architecture was used. Regression performance was determined by the mean absolute error (MAE) with binary classification assessed with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Using the full set of predictors, the test set MAE between the ML-predicted and actual PTA was 5.29 dB HL (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.97-5.61). The 5 most influential predictors of higher PTA were increased age, worse subjective hearing, male gender, increased body mass index, and history of smoking. The 5-factor abbreviated model performed comparably to the extended feature set with MAE 5.36 (95% CI: 5.03-5.69) and AUC for PTA > 25 dB HL of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90-0.94). CONCLUSION: The ML model was able to predict PTA with patient demographics, clinical factors, and subjective hearing status. ML-based prediction may be used to identify individuals who could benefit most from audiometric evaluation.

Multi-tasking deep network for tinnitus classification and severity prediction from multimodal structural MR images.

Objective:Subjective tinnitus is an auditory phantom perceptual disorder without an objective biomarker. Fast and efficient diagnostic tools will advance clinical practice by detecting or confirming the condition, tracking change in severity, and monitoring treatment response. Motivated by evidence of subtle anatomical, morphological, or functional information in magnetic resonance images of the brain, we examine data-driven machine learning methods for joint tinnitus classification (tinnitus or no tinnitus) and tinnitus severity prediction.Approach:We propose a deep multi-task multimodal framework for tinnitus classification and severity prediction using structural MRI (sMRI) data. To leverage complementary information multimodal neuroimaging data, we integrate two modalities of three-dimensional sMRI-T1 weighted (T1w) and T2 weighted (T2w) images. To explore the key components in the MR images that drove task performance, we segment both T1w and T2w images into three different components-cerebrospinal fluid, grey matter and white matter, and evaluate performance of each segmented image.Main results:Results demonstrate that our multimodal framework capitalizes on the information across both modalities (T1w and T2w) for the joint task of tinnitus classification and severity prediction.Significance:Our model outperforms existing learning-based and conventional methods in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value.

Dizziness Diagnostic Pathways: Factors Impacting Setting, Provider, and Diagnosis at Presentation.

OBJECTIVE: Ensuring that patients with dizziness present to the most appropriate level of care and provider are key goals of quality and cost improvement efforts. Using a symptom-defined cohort of adults presenting for dizziness evaluations, we aimed to identify patient factors associated with ambulatory clinic vs emergency department (ED) presentations, evaluating provider specialty, and assigned diagnoses. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: OptumLabs Data Warehouse (OLDW), a longitudinal, real-world data asset with deidentified administrative claims. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of adults (older than 18 years) who received new dizziness diagnoses (2006-2015) and identified factors associated with setting and provider at initial presentation using multivariable regression models. RESULTS: Of 805,454 individuals with dizziness (median age 52 years, 62% women, 29% black, Asian, or Hispanic), 23% presented to EDs and 77% to clinics (76% primary care, 7% otolaryngology, 5% cardiology, 3% neurology). Predictors of ED presentation were younger age, male sex, black race, lower education, and medical comorbidity. Predictors of primary care clinic presentation were older age and race/ethnicity other than white. Nonetiologic symptom diagnoses alone were assigned to 51% and were most associated with age older than 75 years (odds ratio, 2.90; 95% CI, 2.86-2.94). CONCLUSION: Adults with dizziness often present to a level of care that may be higher than is optimal. Differential care seeking and diagnoses by age, sex, and race/ethnicity reflect influences beyond dizziness presentation acuity. Targeted patient resources, triage systems, provider education, and cross-specialty partnerships are needed to direct dizzy patients to appropriate settings and providers to improve care.

Use of Neuroimaging for Patients With Dizziness Who Present to Outpatient Clinics vs Emergency Departments in the US.

Importance: Overuse of costly neuroimaging technology is associated with low-value care for the prevalent symptom of dizziness. Although quality improvement initiatives have focused on the overuse of computed tomography (CT) scans in emergency departments (EDs), most patients with dizziness present to outpatient clinics. To inform practice and policy, a comprehensive understanding of the uses and costs of neuroimaging across settings and episodes of care is needed. Objective: To characterize neuroimaging use, timing, and spending as well as factors associated with imaging acquisition within 6 months of presentation for dizziness in outpatient vs ED settings. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study of commercial and Medicare Advantage claims for 805 454 adults (≥18 years of age) with new diagnoses of dizziness was conducted from January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2015. Data were analyzed from October 1, 2020, to September 30, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Use of neuroimaging (CT scan, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], angiography, and ultrasonography) and total spending on neuroimaging were measured. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed. The associations of neuroimaging with setting, sociodemographic characteristics, and clinicians were estimated with multivariable analyses. Results: A total of 805 454 individuals with dizziness (502 055 women [62%]; median age, 52 years [range, 18-87 years]) were included in this study; 156 969 (20%) underwent neuroimaging within 6 months of presentation (65 738 of 185 338 [36%] presented to EDs and 91 231 of 620 116 [15%] presented to outpatient clinics). The median time to neuroimaging was 0 days (95% CI, 0-2 days) after ED presentation and 10 days (95% CI, 9-10 days) after outpatient presentation. Neuroimaging was independently associated with advanced age, comorbidity, race and ethnicity, ED presentation, and outpatient clinician specialty. Across sites, a head CT scan was the most used test on presentation date (92% of tests [46 852 of 51 022]). Within 6 months of presentation, a head CT scan was the most used test (47% of all tests [177 949 of 376 149]), followed by brain MRI (25% [93 130 of 376 149]), cerebrovascular ultrasonography (15% [56 175 of 376 149]), and magnetic resonance angiography (9% [34 026 of 376 149]). Of $88 646 047.03 in total neuroimaging spending, MRI accounted for 70% ($61 730 251.95), CT scans for 19% ($16 910 506.24), and ultrasonography for 11% ($10 005 288.84). Per-test median spending ranged from $68.97 (CT scan of the head) to $319.63 (MRI of the brain) among commercially insured individuals and $43.21 (CT scan of the head) to $362.02 (MRI of the orbit, face, and neck) among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that use of neuroimaging for dizziness is prevalent across settings. Interventions to optimize the use of neuroimaging must occur early in the patient care journey to discourage guideline-discordant use of CT scans, advocate for judicious MRI use (particularly in ambulatory settings), and account for the effects of price transparency.

The first new otologic disorder in a century: superior canal dehiscence syndrome.

Superior canal dehiscence syndrome is a recently described vestibular and hearing condition caused by an absence of bone over the arc of the superior semicircular canal. Patients with the condition present with a variety of perplexing symptoms including conductive hearing loss, hyperacusis, vertigo, autophony, and eye movement in response to sound. This article presents the case of a patient with the condition, discusses how it is distinct from other vestibular and hearing disorders, and describes how patients with this disorder can be diagnosed and treated.

Efficient Use of Vestibular Testing.

While the majority of vestibular disorders may be diagnosed solely on clinical grounds, a variety of clinical scenarios exist in which objective functional assessment of the vestibular system provides data that facilitate diagnosis and treatment decisions. There exists a veritable armamentarium of sophisticated vestibular test modalities, including videonystagmography, rotary chair testing, video head impulse testing, and vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials. This article aims to help clinicians apply an accessible decision-making rubric to identify the clinical scenarios that may and may not benefit from data derived from specific vestibular function tests.

Variation in Canalith Repositioning Procedure Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries: Understanding the Role of Geographic Region and Provider Specialty.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical practice guidelines recommend canalith repositioning procedures (CRPs) for the management of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). As only 10 to 20% of affected individuals receive CRPs, there is concern for guideline adherence and knowledge dissemination to relevant medical specialties. This study aimed to characterize patterns of CRP utilization over time, across all United States regions, and by provider specialty. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis with time trends of CRP claims in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service Provider Utilization and Payment database, 2012 to 2017. SETTING: National administrative claims data. PATIENTS: Fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries. INTERVENTIONS: Canalith repositioning procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CRP utilization was analyzed by year, hospital referral region (HRR), and provider specialty. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2017, 253,894 CRPs were performed on 146,139 Medicare beneficiaries and CRP utilization increased 80%. CRP use varied widely by geographic region. In 2017, CRP use per 100,000 beneficiaries varied 113-fold across HRRs (range, 6.0-701.8, interquartile range, 68.4, extremal ratio, 116.9). Most CRPs were performed by otolaryngologists (50.9%) and physical therapists (34.3%) with few by primary care providers (1.3%). CONCLUSIONS: CRP utilization increased substantially suggesting improved dissemination and implementation of BPPV management guidelines. Nevertheless, wide geographic and provider-level variation remained, signifying non-uniform provider practices and access to care. Care for BPPV may thus be improved through education and incentivization of a broader range of providers.