Quality laboratory issues in bleeding disorders.

Selected quality issues pertinent to the determination of accurate results in the haemostasis laboratory are discussed. Specifically, the implementation of a successful external quality-assessment scheme is described, including its impact on result accuracy as well as the programme's unique challenges and opportunities. Errors in the preanalytical phase of laboratory testing represent the greatest source for reporting incorrect test results. Some of the most common preanalytical errors are described including those that necessitate sample rejection. Analytical means to identify potential sources of error and analytical means to overcome particular interferences are described. Representing the most important clinical complication in the treatment of patients with haemophilia, quality issues related to determination of the presence of inhibitory antibodies against factor VIII (FVIII) are reviewed. Heat treatment of patient plasma prior to testing, particularly in patients receiving replacement FVIII concentrate or during induction of immune tolerance to achieve more accurate results is recommended, while screening activated partial thromboplastin time-based mixing tests to rule out inhibitor presence is discouraged. The initiatives presented in this review can be implemented in robust and resource restricted settings to improve the quality of laboratory testing in patients with bleeding disorders.

International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) recommendations for the performance and interpretation of activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time mixing tests.

This guidance document has been prepared on behalf of the International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH). The aim of the document is to provide guidance and recommendations for the performance and interpretation of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombin time (PT) plasma mixing tests in clinical laboratories in all regions of the world. The following areas are included in this document: preanalytical, analytical, postanalytical, and quality assurance considerations as they relate to the proper performance and interpretation of plasma mixing tests. The recommendations are based on good laboratory practice, published data in peer-reviewed literature, and expert opinion.

Effects of telavancin on coagulation test results.

BACKGROUND: The lipoglycopeptide antibiotic, telavancin, may interfere with some laboratory coagulation tests including prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of telavancin on PT and aPTT assays in common use. METHODS: Pooled normal human plasma was spiked with telavancin 10, 20, 100 or 200 µg/ml (equivalent to trough, 2 × trough, peak and 2 × peak clinical plasma concentrations, respectively) or diluent control (0.9% sodium chloride). Samples were analysed using 16 PT reagents and seven aPTT reagents. RESULTS: Telavancin 200 µg/ml (corresponding to 2 × peak clinical plasma concentration), produced significant PT prolongation (> 9% difference vs. diluent control) with all the 16 PT reagents (range 12% to > 600%). At lower telavancin concentrations, PT prolongation was dose-dependent and varied among reagents, but appeared greatest with preparations containing recombinant tissue factor. With telavancin 10 µg/ml (equivalent to trough), PT prolongation was 10% with HemosIL(®) PT-Fibrinogen Recombinant, while ranging from 5% to -1% with all other reagents. Significant (> 34% difference vs. baseline) and dose-dependent aPTT prolongation was observed with all the seven reagents in samples spiked with telavancin 100 or 200 µg/ml (range 65-142% at 200 µg/ml). aPTT reagents containing a silica activator appeared to be more sensitive to telavancin interference. Telavancin 10 µg/ml was not associated with increased aPTT with any of the reagents tested. CONCLUSIONS: Telavancin has the potential to prolong both PT and aPTT in vitro. It is recommended that samples for PT or aPTT be obtained just prior to a telavancin dose (trough).

Advantages, disadvantages and optimization of one-stage and chromogenic factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B.

Haemophilia A and B diagnosis and disease severity classification are determined on the basis of results from factor VIII (FVIII) and factor FIX (FIX) activity assays, respectively. These assays are also used for potency labelling, postinfusion monitoring of factor replacement products and testing for FVIII/FIX inhibitors. This review focuses on activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)-based one-stage assays (OSAs) and two-stage chromogenic substrate assays (CSAs). Currently, there is considerable inter-laboratory variability in the results obtained using OSAs, which can be intensified in a reagent-specific manner by the presence of the new modified recombinant factor replacement products that are entering the market. Furthermore, the use of CSAs, which tend to show less variability, especially with the new modified products, is recommended in a number of clinical scenarios. Clinical laboratories may, therefore, need to establish CSAs for routine use. In this review, we aim to improve understanding and help establish best practices by describing the methodology behind OSAs and CSAs and highlighting assay advantages and limitations. We argue that there can be value in offering both assay methodologies in clinical laboratories that contribute to the care of patients with haemophilia A or B. Educating both laboratory scientists and clinicians about the strengths and weaknesses of each type of assay will help to establish the necessary dialogue that is key to ensuring not only that the appropriate assays are used in the right clinical situations, but also that the results are interpreted correctly.

The danger of relying on the APTT and PT in patients on DOAC therapy, a potential patient safety issue.

Prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR) correlates poorly with plasma concentrations of direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACS) including direct thrombin and direct Xa inhibitors. It has been repeatedly demonstrated that patients can have normal APTT and PT/INR with a therapeutic plasma concentration of a DOAC. Clinicians can no longer rely on a normal APTT and PT to determine that an anticoagulated patient is safe to undergo an invasive procedure. Laboratory scientists need to play a key and active role in educating clinicians about the limitations of the APTT and PT in patients on DOAC prophylaxis or therapy.

The laboratory's 2015 perspective on direct oral anticoagulant testing.

The introduction of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy into clinical use in the past 5 years has had significant impact on the clinical laboratory. Clinicians' desire to determine plasma drug presence or measure drug concentration, and more recent observations regarding the limitations and utility of coagulation testing in the setting of DOAC treatment, suggest that early published recommendations regarding laboratory testing should be reassessed. These initial recommendations, furthermore, were often based on drug-spiked plasma studies, rather than samples from patients receiving DOAC therapy. We have demonstrated that reagent sensitivity varies significantly whether drug-spiked samples or samples from DOAC-treated patients are tested. Data from drug-enriched samples must therefore be interpreted with caution or be used as a guide only. We present laboratory assays that can be used to determine drug presence and to measure drug concentration, and provide recommended testing algorithms. As DOAC therapy may significantly impact on specialty coagulation assays, we review those tests with the potential to give false-positive and false-negative results.

Comparison of the effect of the anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulants apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban on coagulation assays.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of increasing concentrations of direct anti-Xa oral anticoagulants (DOAC) apixaban-, edoxaban-, and rivaroxaban-enriched plasma samples on various prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), heparin calibrated anti-Xa methods, and other coagulation assays. METHODS: Apixaban, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban was dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide and added to pooled normal plasma to obtain concentrations ranging from 0 ng/mL to approximately 600 ng/mL. The samples were tested using Innovin(®) , Neoplastine(®) CI Plus, Recombiplastin 2G, and Thromborel(®) S for PT testing and Actin, Actin(®) FS, Actin(®) FSL, APTT-Automate, and SynthaSIL for APTT. Samples were also tested using four different anti-Xa methods calibrated for unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin. Special coagulation assays included antithrombin activity, lupus anticoagulant assays, and others. For special coagulation assays, the concentration of DOAC that resulted in a >15% change from baseline value was determined. DOAC quantification was performed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: All PT and APTT reagents demonstrated a higher sensitivity for edoxaban and rivaroxaban than for apixaban. Anti-Xa methods were able to detect low concentrations of DOAC. DOACs effected special coagulation assays to differing degrees, with lupus anticoagulant testing using dilute viper venom, the most sensitive test to the presence of anti-Xa DOAC. CONCLUSION: No PT or APTT reagent system effectively detected apixaban. All anti-Xa methods demonstrated sensitivity to low concentrations of DOAC. Dilute viper venom methods are exquisitely sensitive to anti-Xa DOAC, suggesting potential use of this assay for screening or measuring these drugs.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) in the Laboratory: 2015 Review.

Direct oral anticoagulant therapies, including direct anti-Xa and thrombin inhibitors have recently been introduced and may have advantages over vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin. This review describes briefly the clinical utility and mechanism of action of these agents. Detailed information is provided on effect of these agents on routine assays including the APTT and PT as well as their impact on specialty laboratory assays. Also included are the use of drug specific assays and a discussion of alternative methods to determine relative drug concentration, such as evaluating drug calibrators in APTT and PT assays and using heparin calibrated anti-Xa assays to measure direct Xa inhibitors.

Assessing nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in the laboratory.

Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are being used with increasing frequency due to their safety profile, ease of use, and given that therapeutic monitoring is not required. As these agents have only recently been FDA approved, their effect on routine and specialty coagulation assays is not well appreciated. This article discusses NOAC effect on routine coagulation assays and whether these assays can be used to estimate drug concentration as well as which assays are suitable to quantitate drug concentration in plasma. Also reviewed is the use of manufactured drug calibrators to determine reagent responsiveness and the effect of these agents on various special coagulation assays.

Pearls and pitfalls in factor inhibitor assays.

The proper performance and interpretation of factor inhibitor assays is a critical role for the hemostasis laboratory. Both false-positive and false-negative inhibitor assays may be reported, leading to serious patient mismanagement. Knowledge and recognition of common causes of both false-positive and negative-results can aid in the identification of these potential pitfalls. Safeguards to reporting accurate factor inhibitor assays include initial characterization of the sample, using the Nijmegen modification, properly performing and interpreting an incubated mixing test in conjunction, and performing two dilutions for each dependent dilution in the factor inhibitor assay.

Effects of anticoagulation on markers of activation of clotting following major orthopedic surgery.

INTRODUCTION: This study examines makers of activation of clotting following three chemoprophylactic regimens used for prevention of postoperative venous thromboembolic disease (TED) following high-risk surgery for TED. METHODS: Patients having elective primary knee or hip replacement surgery received variable dose warfarin (target international normalized ratios 2.0-2.5), 1 mg warfarin daily starting 7 days preoperatively or aspirin 325 mg daily starting on the day of surgery. Twelve patients in each group were treated for 28 ± 2 days. Thrombin-antithrombin (T-AT) and prothrombin fragment F1 + 2 were measured at baseline and postoperative days 3 and 28 ± 2. RESULTS: Thrombin-antithrombin and F1 + 2 on postoperative day 3 were equal for the study groups. By days 28 ± 2, variable dose warfarin therapy group suppressed production of F1 + 2 (P = 0.002) with no difference in the T-AT accumulation. F1 + 2 for other patients overlapped the normal range. CONCLUSION: The signals of activated clotting following surgery did not differentiate the three regimens on postoperative day 3. Variable dose warfarin was associated with suppression of F1 + 2 after 1 month of therapy, with no effect on accumulation of T-AT. Fixed low-dose warfarin started 7 days prior to surgery and aspirin are not inferior on postoperative day 3, but appear to be inferior over a longer treatment.

Hereditary dysfunctional protein C molecules (type II): assay characterization and proposed classification.

Protein C (PC) deficiency is among the increasing number of recognized causes of hereditary thrombotic disease. Two types of PC deficiency have been described: 1) Type I, which is characterized by a concomitant decrease in PC activity and antigen, and 2) Type II, characterized by disproportionately low activity compared to antigen (i.e. a dysfunctional molecule). To date, only a small number of Type II patients have been described. This study was undertaken to evaluate a number of dysfunctional PC molecules by comparing PC clotting and amidolytic activities with antigen levels. For these studies, an automated PTT-based clotting PC assay was developed. This assay was sensitive to 1% of a normal plasma pool, specific, accurate, and reproducible (+/- 12%). A good correlation (r = 0.918) of the clotting activity to antigen was found in normal individuals and Type I heterozygous and homozygous patients. To classify Type II PC deficient patients, the antigen, amidolytic and clotting PC levels were compared in ten affected families. The clotting activities were decreased in all affected members, whereas the antigen levels were within the normal limits. In four of the 10 families, the amidolytic activity was normal and similar to the antigen levels. This suggests that in certain families, defects in the PC molecule occur in regions not associated with amidolytic functions. From these studies, the molecular basis of Type II PC deficiency is varied and complex, involving different functional domains of the PC molecule. Therefore, we have suggested a nomenclature algorithm for Type II PC deficiency based on the location of the defect within the specific domains of the PC molecule.

Clinical evaluation of protein C: a comparative review of antigenic and functional assays.

Thromboembolic disease is a major complication of protein C (PC) deficiency, which is among the increasing number of recognized causes of hereditary thrombotic disease. The laboratory evaluation of PC is of the utmost importance in the accurate diagnosis of this deficiency. In this review, we describe the various types of clinical antigenic and activity assays of PC. The attributes of each type of assay are discussed, as well as the value of each assay in diagnosing the various acquired and hereditary deficiencies of PC. This basic review is intended for laboratories planning to institute PC assays.

A laboratory approach to the evaluation of hereditary hypercoagulability.

The concept of hypercoagulability and especially its evaluation in the clinical laboratory has changed dramatically during the last few years. The genetic basis and the mechanisms of the various factors responsible for hypercoagulability are briefly reviewed with emphasis on the most common genetic deficiencies. The major thrust of this review centers on the cost-effective approach to examining patients with a personal or family history of venous thrombosis. Several new concepts dealing with thrombotic risk are presented with a focus on the theory that multiple factors cause thrombosis in affected patients. A proposal for a cost-effective sequential testing scheme for the accurate diagnosis of hereditary hypercoagulability is discussed. The knowledge of thrombotic risk factors is evolving rapidly, requiring the clinical laboratory to remain flexible. Ultimately, the clinical laboratory must take a leading role in the diagnosis of hereditary thrombotic disease by serving as the consultant to the primary caregiver by providing an up-to-date and cost-effective evaluation.

Effect of 3.2% vs 3.8% sodium citrate concentration on routine coagulation testing.

The effects of 3.2% and 3.8% sodium citrate concentration on the results of routine coagulation assays (prothrombin time [PT] and activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT]) were evaluated by means of two sets of reagents, one responsive and the other nonresponsive. Five groups were entered in the study: healthy volunteers; outpatients receiving stable oral anticoagulant therapy; and hospitalized patients receiving intravenous (i.v.) heparin therapy, both i.v. heparin and oral anticoagulant therapy, or no anticoagulant therapy. With use of nonresponsive PT and aPTT reagents, varying the citrate concentration has little clinical significance except in patients receiving i.v. heparin therapy. In contrast, when responsive PT and aPTT reagents are used, the concentration of sodium citrate anticoagulant has a significant effect on assay results. Eighteen percent of samples from patients receiving stable oral anticoagulant therapy demonstrated a change of less than 0.7 INR (International Normalized Ratio) units between citrate concentrations. Nineteen percent of patients receiving i.v. heparin therapy had a greater than 7-second difference when aPTT results were compared. These data demonstrate that citrate concentration affects the results of coagulation tests. On the basis of these data, it is recommended that 3.2% citrate be used for all coagulation tests.

Minimum specimen volume requirements for routine coagulation testing: dependence on citrate concentration.

We evaluated the effect of sample volume and citrate concentration on results of routine coagulation assays (prothrombin time [PT] and activated partial thromboplastin time [APTT]). The study was performed on samples obtained from healthy persons and patients receiving oral anticoagulant therapy. Standard evacuated tubes (3.2% and 3.8% sodium citrate) were filled to varying total sample volumes ranging from 3.0 to 5.0 mL, and results of routine coagulation tests were compared. Underfilling may significantly affect the APTT and PT, resulting in artifactual prolongation of results. This effect is most pronounced in samples drawn into 3.8% citrate. By using 3.8% citrate, there is a statistically significant difference in the results of PT assays in the samples less than 80% filled compared with those that are 100% filled. For APTT assays performed on samples drawn into 3.8% citrate, a statistical difference occurred at less than 90% filled. This effect was less pronounced when samples were drawn into 3.2% sodium citrate. We found no statistically significant difference in PT results from a 3.2% citrate tube between fill volumes of 60% and 100% and none for APTT results between fill volumes of 70% and 100%. This study further supports the recommendation to use 3.2% sodium citrate concentration, because 60% of the optimum filled volume for PT and 70% of the optimum filled volume for APTT are acceptable.

Enhanced standardization of the International Normalized Ratio through the use of plasma calibrants: a concise review.

The INR was introduced in 1983 as a means of standardizing the prothrombin time test and improving management of patients receiving warfarin-based oral anticoagulant therapy. Despite the eventual widespread use of the INR system, unacceptable levels of inter-laboratory variation persist. The use of certified plasma calibrants has been studied as a means to reducing INR variation. This review examines the pre-analytical and analytical variables contributing to INR problems. Also, the findings of several multicenter studies in which plasma calibrants were deployed are presented. Issues such as the number of calibrants used and their composition, calibrant format, plasma citrate concentration, reference thromboplastins used, methods of calibrant certification and alternative techniques for local system calibration are examined. The development of consensus guidelines on the use of plasma calibrants for INR standardization is recommended.

Activated partial thromboplastin time reagent sensitivity to the presence of the lupus anticoagulant.

The lupus anticoagulant (LA) is an acquired abnormality that is associated with a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). It is one of the most frequent coagulation abnormalities seen in the routine clinical laboratory. The sensitivity of various commercial aPTT reagents varies in their ability to detect the LA. We undertook this evaluation by using a single coagulation instrument to determine the sensitivity of five different commercial aPTT reagents to the presence of the LA. We evaluated 23 patients with known LA using five different reagents, two of which were marketed as having enhanced LA sensitivity. All samples and testing were performed under the same conditions in a timely manner. Based on these data, essentially all of the commercial reagents that were tested could detect patients with known LA by at least minimally prolonging the aPTT. Some reagents were slightly better than others in their ability to detect the LA. For most hospitals, the detection of the LA is not the highest priority for the use of the aPTT assay. In most cases, heparin anticoagulation monitoring is the most common use of the aPTT assay. Since all five reagents are sensitive to the LA, then the best overall reagent will be the one with the best sensitivity to the most important need for the laboratory (usually heparin monitoring). Therefore, a reagent should be chosen based on the primary monitoring requirements of the aPTT assay, and greater than 90% of the patients with the LA will be detected.

Right or wrong sample received for coagulation testing? Tentative algorithms for detection of an incorrect type of sample.

Inappropriate blood collection potentially comprises the major pre-analytical problem for coagulation testing. Inappropriate samples are most difficult to detect when received as secondary aliquots, common for referred tests. This study aimed to identify a simple, quick and inexpensive process to help laboratories distinguish the type of sample, should there be suspicion of inappropriate collection. Samples from 15 patients [selected on the basis that four different primary tubes were available: serum, citrated plasma, ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) plasma, lithium-heparin plasma], were tested for common electrolytes that might substantially differ according to the type of sample. In citrated plasma, potassium, chloride, calcium and magnesium were significantly decreased compared with serum and lithium-heparin plasma, while sodium was markedly increased. In EDTA plasma, sodium and chloride were significantly decreased compared with both serum and lithium-heparin plasma, potassium was always >14 mmol/l, whereas magnesium and calcium were virtually undetectable. These data allowed development of two algorithms for differential identification of citrated plasma vs. other samples with 100% sensitivity and specificity, the former based on the sequential measurement of potassium, calcium and sodium, the latter on potassium and sodium. These simple assays can supplement classical coagulation test methods to identify most inappropriate blood collections and validate sample rejection.