RESUMO
CONTEXT: Patients discharged as "healthy" with the symptoms of spontaneous hypoglycemia, commonly known as Whipple's triad, need more attention. OBJECTIVE: Characterization and long-term follow-up of symptom development in patients with spontaneous hypoglycemia discharged as "healthy". The objective was to ascertain whether any conditions related to the symptoms were diagnosed during the follow-up period. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patient data and evaluation of a specific questionnaire on the development of symptoms of spontaneous hypoglycemia. In addition, patient questionnaires were evaluated and primary care physicians were asked about possible diseases not recorded at baseline that occurred during the follow-up period. SETTING: Center for Endocrinology, Diabetology, and Osteology at the University Hospital Marburg, Inpatient Department, Germany. PATIENTS: All patients who presented to our center for the 72-hour fast between 2005 and 2018 and were discharged without an internal medicine diagnosis were included. INTERVENTIONS: Survey by questionnaire, via telephone interview. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-reported information on current symptoms compared to original symptoms, diagnosis of insulinoma or diabetes mellitus during follow-up, matched with primary care physician data, and metabolic and biometric data such as body mass index (BMI), homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA IR), insulin sensitivity Matsuda Index (ISI-M), and area under the curve. RESULTS: A total of 41 datasets were evaluated at baseline and 38 patients were followed for an average of approximately 10 years. In total, 61% of respondents still reported the same symptoms as at baseline. No insulinoma was missed in these patients. Only two of the 38 patients developed diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSION: The high percentage of patients who are discharged as "healthy" and still have symptoms after many years is disturbing. It is possible that the symptoms are not due to low blood glucose. We urge caution with use of the term "healthy". We advocate a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach after an organic cause of hypoglycemia has been ruled out. Psychosomatic treatment seems to be useful. In addition, more research should be conducted on this topic.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare genetic disease of autosomal dominant inheritance, with an estimated prevalence of 3-20/100 000. Its main feature is neuroendocrine neoplasia in the parathyroid glands, the endocrine pancreas, the duodenum, and the pituitary gland. In this article, we review the diagnostic and therapeutic options for MEN1-associated tumors. METHODS: We present an analysis and evaluation of retrospective case studies retrieved from PubMed, guidelines from Germany and abroad, and our own experience. RESULTS: The disease is caused by mutations in the MEN1 gene. Mutation carriers should participate in a regular, specialized screening program from their twenties onward. The early diagnosis and individualized treatment of MEN1-associated tumors can prevent the development of life-threatening hormonal syndromes and prolong the expected life span of MEN1 patients from 55 to 70 years, as well as improving their quality of life. Surgical treatment is based on the location, size, growth dynamics, and functional activity of the tumors. The evidence for treatment strategies is derived from retrospective studies only (level III evidence) and the optimal treatment is often a matter of debate. This is a further reason for treatment in specialized centers. CONCLUSION: MEN1 is a rare disease, and, consequently, the evidence base for its treatment is limited. Carriers of disease-causing mutations in the MEN1 gene should be cared for in specialized interdisciplinary centers, so that any appreciable tumor growth or hormonal activity can be detected early and organ-sparing treatment can be provided.