NIACE score refines the overall survival of hepatocellular carcinoma by Barcelona clinic liver cancer staging.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The NIACE score provides prognostic values for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in European studies. We aim to evaluate the prognostic value of the NIACE score in Asian patients. METHODS: Patients with HCC were retrospectively enrolled from a tertiary medical center in Taiwan during 2009-2014, and their clinical information were collected. The NIACE score was calculated according to the Nodular numbers, tumor Infiltration, Alpha-fetoprotein level, Child-Pugh score, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score. The prognostic values of NIACE score for overall survival according to individual treatment and the Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) staging were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 468 patients were included with a median follow-up of 30 months. A greater NIACE score correlated with lower median survival and higher BCLC staging. Regardless of treatment modalities, NIACE scores (0, 1-1.5, 2.5-3, and 4-7) significantly predicted survival between groups (log-rank P < 0.001). Specifically, NIACE score (0, 1-1.5, 2.5-3, and 4-7) significantly predicted survival in patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization (log-rank P < 0.001). NIACE score 1, 2.5, and 4 further distinguished overall survival in BCLC A, B, and C patients, respectively (all log-rank P < 0.01). After adjustment of the confounders and the BCLC staging, NIACE score of 2.5-3 and 4-7 (vs 0) had a significantly increased risk of mortality with a hazard ratio of 4.04 (95% confidence interval: 2.14-7.64, P < 0.001) and 7.45 (95% confidence interval: 3.22-17.23, P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The NIACE score helps refine differential prognosis among BCLC A, B, and C subgroups of Asian patients with HCC, especially in those receiving transarterial chemoembolization.

[Hepatitis B virus infection: control or cure?] / Hépatite B : contrôler ou guérir ?

Hepatitis b virus infection: control or cure? Hepatitis B virus infection remains a global public health issue with changing epidemiology due to several factors including vaccination policies and migration. Approximately 254 million individuals are chronic HBsAg carrier worldwide including around 300 000 individuals in France. Host immune response plays a key role in hepatitis B pathogenesis and clinical manifestations. Hepatitis B screening should be performed in all individual with risk factors and in patients with elevated ALT. Hepatitis B vaccination should be implemented at birth or during early childhood and in individuals with risk factors. The needs for curative treatment depend mainly on the stage of the disease. Current HBV treatment are based on long term use of nucleos(t)ide analogue and rarely on the use of finite duration of pegylated interferon. The endpoints of therapy are long-term suppression of HBV replication, biochemical response and optimally durable loss of HBsAg and anti-HBs seroconversion. Current and future research aim to develop combination with antiviral therapy targeting multiple steps in the HBV lifecycle that rapidly suppress viral replication and viral antigen production and immune modulatory therapy to restore immune response to HBV in order to achieve the goal of HBV cure.

Hépatite b : contrôler ou guérir ? L'infection par le virus de l'hépatite B (VHB) est un problème majeur de santé publique. avec 254 millions de personnes porteuses de ce virus dans le monde et près de 300 000 en France. Le rôle de la réponse immunitaire est essentiel au cours de l'infection par le VHB et responsable de l'essentiel des lésions hépatiques et des manifestations cliniques. Le dépistage de l'hépatite chronique, qui est le plus souvent asymptomatique, doit être fait devant tout sujet ayant des facteurs de risque de contamination et devant toute augmentation des transaminases. La vaccination, qui est très efficace, doit être effectuée de façon systématique dans la petite enfance et chez les patients ayant des facteurs de risque de contamination. La nécessité du traitement dépend essentiellement de la phase de l'histoire naturelle du VHB où se situe le patient. Le traitement actuel de l'hépatite chronique B repose essentiellement sur un traitement prolongé par les analogues nucléosidiques ou nucléotidiques et plus rarement par un traitement de durée finie par l'interféron alpha pégylé. L'objectif de ces traitements est d'obtenir une virosuppression prolongée, une réponse biochimique et, de façon optimale, une perte de l'antigène HBs et une séroconversion anti-HBs durable, définissant la guérison fonctionnelle. Les recherches actuelles visent à développer de nouveaux antiviraux directs et des traitements immunomodulateurs dont les combinaisons permettront peutêtre d'obtenir une guérison de l'hépatite B.

Selective internal radiation therapy compared with sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis.

PURPOSE: Tumoural portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a major prognostic factor in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The efficacy of sorafenib, the only treatment approved at an advanced stage, is limited. Based on previous data, selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT), or (90)Y radioembolization, seems an interesting option. We aimed to compare both treatments in this population. METHODS: We retrospectively compared patients treated in two centres for HCC with tumoural PVT. We compared overall survival (OS) between patients treated with SIRT and patients treated with sorafenib. Analyses were performed before and after 1:1 matching with a propensity score for controlling indication bias, using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were analysed, 34 patients treated with SIRT and 117 patients treated with sorafenib only. In the whole population, SIRT was associated with a higher median OS as compared with sorafenib: 18.8 vs 6.5 months (log-rank p < 0.001). There was an imbalance of baseline characteristics between patients treated by SIRT and sorafenib, which justified patient matching with use of a propensity score: 24 patients treated with SIRT could be matched with 24 patients treated with sorafenib. OS was estimated with a median of 26.2 vs 8.7 months in patients treated with SIRT vs sorafenib, respectively (log-rank p = 0.054). Before and after patient matching, the adjusted hazard ratio related to treatment by SIRT was estimated at 0.62 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.97] (p = 0.037) and 0.40 (95 % CI 0.19-0.82) (p = 0.013), respectively. CONCLUSION: SIRT seems more effective than sorafenib in patients presenting with HCC and tumoural PVT. This hypothesis is being tested in prospective randomized trials.

Retreatment with TACE: the ABCR SCORE, an aid to the decision-making process.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard of care for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and it is the most commonly used treatment for HCC worldwide. However, no prognostic indices, designed to select appropriate candidates for repeat conventional TACE, have been incorporated in the guidelines. METHODS: From January 2007 to April 2012, 139 consecutive HCC patients, mainly with an alcohol- or viral-induced disease, were treated with TACE. Using a regression model on the prognostic variables of our population, we determined a score designed to help for repeat TACE and we validated it in two cohorts. We also compared it to the ART score. RESULTS: In the multivariate analysis, four prognostic factors were associated with overall survival: BCLC and AFP (>200 ng/ml) at baseline, increase in Child-Pugh score by ⩾2 from baseline, and absence of radiological response. These factors were included in a score (ABCR, ranging from -3 to +6), which correlates with survival and identifies three groups. The ABCR score was validated in two different cohorts of 178 patients and proofed to perform better than the ART score in distinguishing between patients' prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: The ABCR score is a simple and clinically relevant index, summing four prognostic variables endorsed in HCC. An ABCR score ⩾4 prior to the second TACE identifies patients with dismal prognosis who may not benefit from further TACE sessions.

How to optimize current therapy of HCV genotype 1 infection with boceprevir.

Treatment with first generation protease inhibitors (PIs) is a milestone in the history of HCV therapy. Triple therapy with boceprevir (BOC) improves sustained virological response (SVR) by 30% in treatment naïve genotype 1 patients and by 50-60% in relapsers, 40-45% in partial responders and 25% in null responders compared with the Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin regimen. To optimize BOC treatment, screening and access to treatment must be improved in genotype 1 patients. To select the ideal candidate for immediate treatment with triple therapy, an individual risk/benefit ratio must be assessed. Recent data have shown that patients with compensated cirrhosis and more advanced disease may also benefit from this regimen. Moreover, in HCV patients with extrahepatic manifestations, patients with HCV recurrence after liver transplantation and HIV-HCV co-infected patients, immediate treatment with triple therapy should be discussed. There is growing evidence that triple therapy with BOC is cost-effective in genotype 1 patients. Finally, the treatment design of BOC must be optimized in relation to baseline characteristics, so that optimal stopping rules can be followed, Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can be prevented and AEs can be accurately prevented and managed.

Outcomes and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment prognosis and comparison with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in a French multicenter matched real-life study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atz/Bev) has radically changed the treatment strategy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but raises questions. Our objectives were to determine survival outcomes and safety in a real-life multicenter French cohort, to investigate the on-treatment prognostic value of the bioinflammatory RECA score, and to perform a matched comparison with patients who previously received tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). METHODOLOGY: A retrospective analysis of 109 consecutive patients enrolled from September 2020 to January 2023 and a post matched comparison with a TKI cohort ( n  = 79) by the propensity score matching method. RESULTS: The Atz/Bev population was mainly nonviral disease patients (69%) with Child-Pugh grade A (90%), performance status 0/1 (90%), and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B (38%) or stage C (62%) classification. After a median follow-up of 6.5 months (3.6-11.7), overall survival (OS) was 13.0 (5.1-28.7) months. OS was independently associated with metastasis, increased alkaline phosphatase, and serum bilirubin levels. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 78% of patients, mostly grade 1 or 2. The RECA score clearly revealed two different prognosis groups after three cycles. No difference in OS was observed after matching between sequential treatment with TKIs and Atz/Bev. CONCLUSION: This real-life study highlights the importance of liver function when using Atz/Bev combination and the necessity of identifying predictive markers of response to HCC therapies. Our findings suggest a change in practices, with a marked proportion of intermediate stages, and support the on-treatment prognostic value of an inflammatory score.

Surgical treatment of tertiary hyperparathyroidism: does one fit for all?

Background: Tertiary hyperparathyroidism (3HPT) is defined as a condition of excessive autonomous excretion of intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) with persistent hypercalcemia (>10.5 mg/dL) that lasts for more than 12 months after a successful kidney transplantation, in the context of a long course secondary hyperparathyroidism (2HPT). The chronic high levels of iPTH cause a worsening of graft function, accompanied by systemic symptoms of hypercalcemia. The only curative therapy is parathyroidectomy (PTX). It remains unclear whether total parathyroidectomy with autotransplantation (TPTX-AT) or subtotal parathyroidectomy (SPTX) lead to better outcomes. Aims: The aim of this retrospective, single-institution cohort study is to evaluate the rate of persistent or recurrent disease and postoperative calcium/iPTH disturbances in patients treated with TPTX-AT or SPTX for 3HPT. Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis of 3HPT patients submitted to TPTX-AT or SPTX between 2007-2020 with at least 24 months follow-up was conducted. The outcome parameters included persistence/recurrence of disease, incidence of transitory hypocalcemia, and temporary/permanent hypoparathyroidism. Results: A cohort of 52 patients was analyzed and divided in two groups: 38 (73%) were submitted for TPTX-AT, and 14 patients (27%) were submitted for SPTX. The TPTX-AT population showed lower plasmatic calcium concentrations compared with the SPTX group during the entire follow-up period (p<0.001). There were eight cases (21%) of transitory hypocalcemia in the TPTX-AT group and none in the SPTX group, with p=0.065. Two cases (5%) of temporary hypoparathyroidism occurred in the TPTX-AT group and none in the SPTX group, with p= 0.530. There were no cases of permanent hypoparathyroidism and no cases of persistent disease. No statistical difference was assessed for the recurrence of 3HPT between the TPTX-AT group and the SPTX group (N=1, 3% vs N=1, 7%) (p=0.470). Conclusion: No significative difference was registered between the TPTX-AT and SPTX groups in terms of persistence/recurrence of disease, incidence of transitory hypocalcemia, and temporary/permanent hypoparathyroidism. Mean calcium levels iPTH values were statistically lower among the TPTX-AT group compared with the SPTX group while remaining always in the range of normality.

Optimizing Patient Pathways in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers: Recent Advances and a French Perspective.

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors that are rare in Western countries and have a poor prognosis. Three subgroups are defined by their anatomical location (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma) and exhibit distinct clinical, molecular, and epidemiologic characteristics. Most patients are diagnosed at an advanced disease stage and are not eligible for curative-intent resection. In addition to first- and second-line chemotherapies (CisGem and FOLFOX, respectively), biologic therapies are now available that target specific genomic alterations identified in BTC. To date, targets include alterations in the genes for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1, fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 2, v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2 or ERRB2), and neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK), and for those leading to DNA mismatch repair deficiency. Therapies targeting these genomic alterations have demonstrated clinical benefit for patients with BTC. Despite these therapeutic advancements, genomic diagnostic modalities are not widely used in France, owing to a lack of clinician awareness, local availability of routine genomic testing, and difficulties in obtaining health insurance reimbursement. The addition of durvalumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the immune checkpoint programmed cell death ligand-1, to CisGem in the first-line treatment of advanced BTC has shown an overall survival benefit in the TOPAZ-1 trial. Given the high mortality rates associated with BTC and the life-prolonging therapeutic options now available, it is hoped that the data presented here will support updates to the clinical management of BTC in France.

Radiomics, a Promising New Discipline: Example of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Radiomics is a discipline that involves studying medical images through their digital data. Using "artificial intelligence" algorithms, radiomics utilizes quantitative and high-throughput analysis of an image's textural richness to obtain relevant information for clinicians, from diagnosis assistance to therapeutic guidance. Exploitation of these data could allow for a more detailed characterization of each phenotype, for each patient, making radiomics a new biomarker of interest, highly promising in the era of precision medicine. Moreover, radiomics is non-invasive, cost-effective, and easily reproducible in time. In the field of oncology, it performs an analysis of the entire tumor, which is impossible with a single biopsy but is essential for understanding the tumor's heterogeneity and is known to be closely related to prognosis. However, current results are sometimes less accurate than expected and often require the addition of non-radiomics data to create a performing model. To highlight the strengths and weaknesses of this new technology, we take the example of hepatocellular carcinoma and show how radiomics could facilitate its diagnosis in difficult cases, predict certain histological features, and estimate treatment response, whether medical or surgical.

Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Real-life Data on Liver Disease, Treatment and Prognosis.

Background and Aims: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) have common features and differences. This real-life study investigated their characteristics, treatment modalities, and prognoses. Methods: This retrospective comparative study was performed in 1,075 patients seen at one tertiary center between January 2008 and December 2020. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Subclassification of iCCAs after histological and radiological review, and molecular profiling was performed. Results: HCCs patients were more likely to have early-stage disease than iCCA patients. iCCA patients were more likely to be female, especially those patients without cirrhosis (43% vs. 17%). Cirrhosis was prominent among HCC patients (89% vs. 34%), but no difference in underlying liver disease among cirrhotic patients was found. OS of HCC patients was 18.4 (95% CI: 6.4, 48.3) months, that of iCCA patients was 7.0 (95% CI: 3.4, 20.1) months. OS of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer C HCC patients was 7.8 (95% CI: 4.3, 14.2) months, that of advanced/metastatic iCCA patients was 8.5 (95% CI: 5.7, 12.3) months. In patients treated with sorafenib, OS was longer in HCC patients who received subsequent tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies. No significant OS difference was found between iCCA patients with and without cirrhosis or according to histological subtype. A targetable molecular alteration was detected in 50% of the iCCA patients. Conclusions: In this French series, cirrhosis was common in iCCA, which showed etiological factors comparable to those of HCC, implying a distinct oncogenic pathway. Both entities had a dismal prognosis at advanced stages. However, systemic therapies sequencing in HCC and molecular profiling in iCCA offer new insights.

Perioperative Cetuximab with Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil in Esogastric Adenocarcinoma: A Phase II Study.

PURPOSE: While perioperative chemotherapy provides a survival benefit over surgery alone in gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinomas, the results need to be improved. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative cetuximab combined with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received six cycles of cetuximab, cisplatin, and simplified LV5FU2 before and after surgery. The primary objective was a combined evaluation of the tumor objective response (TOR), assessed by computed tomography, and the absence of major toxicities resulting in discontinuation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) (45% and 90%, respectively). RESULTS: From 2011 to 2013, 65 patients were enrolled. From 64 patients evaluable for the primary endpoint, 19 (29.7%) had a morphological TOR and 61 (95.3%) did not stop NCT prematurely due to major toxicity. Sixty patients (92.3%) underwent resection. Sixteen patients (/56 available, 28.5%) had histological responses (Mandard tumor regression grade ≤3). After a median follow-up of 44.5 months, median disease-free and overall survival were 24.4 [95% CI: 16.4-39.4] and 40.3 months [95% CI: 27.5-NA], respectively. CONCLUSION: Adding cetuximab to the NCT regimen in operable G/GEJ adenocarcinomas is safe, but did not show enough efficacy in the present study to meet the primary endpoint (NCT01360086).

Future treatment of patients with HCV cirrhosis.

Of all hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients, those with cirrhosis are most in need of treatment because of increased morbidity and mortality. Treatment with pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) (PR) has definitely shown the benefits of successful treatment by improving fibrosis, causing the regression of cirrhosis and reducing and preventing cirrhosis-related complications. However, the sustained virological response (SVR) is lower in patients with cirrhosis. First generation protease inhibitors (boceprevir and telaprevir) in combination with PR are a major advancement in the treatment of both naïve and treatment-experienced genotype 1 patients. In naïve patients, the SVR rate with the triple regimen with boceprevir was increased by 14% in patients with severe fibrosis or cirrhosis compared with PR. This benefit was lower than that observed in patients with mild or moderate fibrosis (30%). The SVR rate of the triple regimen with telaprevir was increased by 10-30% compared with PR in patients with severe fibrosis or cirrhosis compared with nearly 30% in patients with mild or moderate fibrosis. In treatment-experienced patients, previous relapsers have the highest increase in SVR with the triple regimen compared with PR, whatever the status of fibrosis. Previous partial or non-responder patients with cirrhosis had lower SVR rates than those without cirrhosis. However, the benefits of telaprevir and boceprevir vs PR was maintained. Previous non-responder patients with cirrhosis benefited the least from treatment. The relapse rate was always higher and side effects were more frequent in patients with cirrhosis compared with those without. First generation protease inhibitors plus PR appear to be a new step forward in the management of HCV genotype 1 patients with cirrhosis.

Response to immunotherapy plus anti-angiogenic agent combination challenges hepatocellular carcinoma prognostic scores.

This new UHPI score identifies three groups with different prognosis, but with no clear therapeutic guidance. Moreover, this model's predictive ability is now challenged in the era of combination therapies where durable responses are more commonly observed, and where response criteria remain to be defined.

Second-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with regorafenib or cabozantinib: Multicenter French clinical experience in real-life after matching.

BACKGROUND: Starting a second-line systemic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common situation. The only therapeutic options in France are two broad-spectrum tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), regorafenib (REG) and cabozantinib (CBZ), but no comparative real-life studies are available. AIM: To evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients treated with REG or CBZ, we investigated the disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety of both drugs. To identify the variables associated with disease progression over time. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was performed on the clinical data of patients attending one of three referral centers (Avignon, Marseille, and Nice) between January 2017 and March 2021 using propensity score matching. PFS and OS were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis (MA) of progression risk factors over time was performed in matched-pair groups. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients 68 (62-74) years old with HCC, Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) B/C (86%), Child-Pugh (CP)-A/B (24%) received REG for 3.4 (1.4-10.5) mo as second-line therapy. Twenty-eight patients 68 (60-73) years, BCLC B/C (75%), CP-A/B (25%) received CBZ for 3.7 (1.8-4.9) mo after first-line treatment with sorafenib [3 (2-4) (CBZ) vs 4 (2.9-11.8) mo (REG), P = 0.0226]. Twenty percent of patients received third-line therapy. After matching, PFS and DCR were not significantly different after a median follow-up of 6.2 (2.7-11.7) mo (REG) vs 5.2 (4-7.2) mo (CBZ), P = 0.6925. There was no difference in grade 3/4 toxicities, dose reductions, or interruptions. The OS of CP-A patients was 8.3 (5.2-24.8) vs 4.9 (1.6-11.7) mo (CP-B), P = 0.0468. The MA of risk factors for progression over time identified C-reactive protein (CRP) > 10 mg/L, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 3, and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 45 IU as predictive factors. CONCLUSION: This multicenter indirect comparative study found no significant difference in PFS between REG and CBZ as second-line therapy for advanced HCC. Elevated levels of inflammatory markers (CRP and NLR) and AST were associated with non-control of TKIs over time. A 2-mo online progression risk calculation is proposed.