Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neurobiol Learn Mem ; 213: 107942, 2024 May 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38815677

RESUMO

The amygdala has been implicated in frustrative nonreward induced by unexpected reward downshifts, using paradigms like consummatory successive negative contrast (cSNC). However, existing evidence comes from experiments involving the central and basolateral nuclei on a broad level. Moreover, whether the amygdala's involvement in reward downshift requires a cSNC effect (i.e., greater suppression in downshifted animals than in unshifted controls) or just consummatory suppression without a cSNC effect, remains unclear. Three groups were exposed to (1) a large reward disparity leading to a cSNC effect (32-to-2% sucrose), (2) a small reward disparity involving consummatory suppression in the absence of a cSNC effect (8-to-2% sucrose), and (3) an unshifted control (2% sucrose). Brains obtained after the first reward downshift session were processed for c-Fos expression, a protein often used as a marker for neural activation. c-Fos-positive cells were counted in the anterior, medial, and posterior portions (A/P axis) of ten regions of the rat basolateral, central, and medial amygdala. c-Fos expression was higher in 32-to-2% sucrose downshift animals than in the other two groups in four regions: the anterior and the medial lateral basal amygdala, the medial capsular central amygdala, and the anterior anterio-ventral medial amygdala. None of the areas exhibited differential c-Fos expression between the 8-to-2% sucrose downshift and the unshifted conditions. Thus, amygdala activation requires exposure to a substantial reward disparity. This approach has identified, for the first time, specific amygdala areas relevant to understand the cSNC effect, suggesting follow-up experiments aimed at testing the function of these regions in reward downshift.

2.
Brain Res Bull ; 124: 182-9, 2016 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27173444

RESUMO

The central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) is considered to be involved in different affective, sensory, regulatory, and acquisition processes. This study analyzed whether electrical stimulation of the PB-CeA system induces preferences in a concurrent place preference (cPP) task, as observed after stimulation of the parabrachial-insular cortex (PB-IC) axis. It also examined whether the rewarding effects are naloxone-dependent. The results show that electrical stimulation of the CeA and external lateral parabrachial subnucleus (LPBe) induces consistent preference behaviors in a cPP task. However, subcutaneous administration of an opiate antagonist (naloxone; 4mg/ml/kg) blocked the rewarding effect of the parabrachial stimulation but not that of the amygdala stimulation. These results are interpreted in the context of multiple brain reward systems that appear to differ both anatomically and neurochemically, notably with respect to the opiate system.


Assuntos
Núcleo Central da Amígdala/efeitos dos fármacos , Estimulação Elétrica , Naloxona/farmacologia , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/farmacologia , Núcleos Parabraquiais/efeitos dos fármacos , Recompensa , Análise de Variância , Animais , Biofísica , Núcleo Central da Amígdala/fisiologia , Condicionamento Operante/efeitos dos fármacos , Condicionamento Operante/fisiologia , Núcleos Parabraquiais/fisiologia , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Autoadministração
3.
Behav Neurosci ; 130(1): 19-28, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26795581

RESUMO

The role of opiate systems has been extensively studied in relation to learning and memory. Naloxone (Nx), an opiate antagonist, was administrated in concurrent (Experiment 1) and sequential (Experiment 2) flavor aversion learning (FAL) tasks. The outcomes demonstrate that Nx impairs the acquisition of concurrent but not sequential FAL. In the concurrent learning (7 trials), both control (vehicle) and Nx2 (treated with Nx only on the first 2 days) groups learned the task. Furthermore, these 2 groups retained the learning in a discrimination test without drug administration (Day 8) but failed a reversal test (Day 9). In contrast, the Nx group (7 trials with Nx) showed no concurrent learning but correctly performed the discrimination test (Day 8) and, critically, the reversal test. These results suggest that Nx blocks concurrent (implicit) learning in these experiments but induces animals to resort to new strategies that are flexible, a characteristic of explicit learning.


Assuntos
Aprendizagem da Esquiva/efeitos dos fármacos , Aprendizagem por Discriminação/efeitos dos fármacos , Naloxona/farmacologia , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/farmacologia , Paladar/efeitos dos fármacos , Análise de Variância , Animais , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Solução Salina Hipertônica/farmacologia , Fatores de Tempo
4.
Brain Res Bull ; 127: 126-133, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27628665

RESUMO

Sensory information from the gastrointestinal system can be transmitted to the brain through the vagus nerve, the intermediate-caudal region of the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST), and various subnuclei of the parabrachial complex, notably the external lateral subnucleus (LPBe). The objective of the present study was to examine the relevance of this subnucleus in satiation and food reintake after gastrointestinal food removal. LPBe-lesioned animals were subjected to a re-intake task following the partial withdrawal of gastric food contents shortly after satiation. Lesioned and control animals ingested a similar amount of the initial liquid meal. However, after withdrawal of one-third of the food consumed, LPBe-lesioned rats were not able to compensate for the deficit created, and their re-intake of food was significantly lower than the amount withdrawn after the satiating meal. In contrast, the food re-intake of control animals was similar to the amount withdrawn. Hence, the LPBe does not appear to be critical in the satiation process under the present experimental conditions. However, the LPBe may be part of a system that is essential in rapid visceral adjustments related to short-term food intake, as also shown in other gastrointestinal regulatory behaviors that require immediate processing of visceral sensory information.


Assuntos
Ingestão de Alimentos/fisiologia , Núcleos Parabraquiais/fisiologia , Saciação/fisiologia , Estômago/fisiologia , Animais , Peso Corporal , Cateteres de Demora , Alimentos , Privação de Alimentos , Masculino , Modelos Animais , Distribuição Aleatória , Ratos Wistar
5.
Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) ; 75(4): 381-90, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26994417

RESUMO

The amygdala is considered a crucial brain nucleus in different modalities of aversive conditioning, including flavor aversion learning (FAL). The importance attributed to the amygdala and its subnuclei has frequently depended on the different stimuli and procedures used in FAL tasks. In this study, FAL was impaired only in animals that had lesions in the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) area and also had their olfactory bulbs removed. However, this task was learned by neurologically intact animals, bulbectomized animals, and rats with lesions exclusively centered in the CeA area alone. These results suggest that the CeA area may be relevant in gustatory-gut associative learning but not in FAL, in which the olfactory system may counteract the deficit produced in taste-visceral convergence.


Assuntos
Aprendizagem por Associação/fisiologia , Aprendizagem da Esquiva/fisiologia , Núcleo Central da Amígdala/lesões , Condicionamento Clássico/fisiologia , Bulbo Olfatório/fisiopatologia , Paladar/fisiologia , Animais , Comportamento Animal/fisiologia , Mapeamento Encefálico , Condicionamento Psicológico/fisiologia , Masculino , Ratos Wistar
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA