Lavender oil preparation Silexan is effective in mild-to-moderate major depression: a randomized, placebo- and reference-controlled trial.

Anxiety and depressive disorders have overlapping symptoms and share common neurobiological pathways. Antidepressant drugs have been demonstrated to be efficacious in anxiety as well. Vice versa, it may also be promising to investigate the efficacy of anxiolytic drugs such as silexan in major depressive disorder (MDD). Patients with a mild or moderate, single or recurrent episode of MDD and a total score of 19-34 points on the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) were randomized to receive 1 × 80 mg/d silexan, 1 × 50 mg/d sertraline, or placebo double-blind, double-dummy for 56 days. The primary outcome measure was the MADRS total score change between baseline and treatment end. Treatment groups were compared using a treatment policy estimand. 498 subjects (silexan 170, sertraline 171, placebo 157) were treated and analyzed. After 8 weeks, silexan and sertraline were superior to placebo for MADRS total score reduction, with absolute differences to placebo of 2.17 (95% confidence interval: 0.58; 3.76) points and 2.59 (1.02; 4.17) points, respectively (p < 0.01). Moreover, silexan was superior to placebo for alleviation of functional impairment according to the Sheehan Disability Scale with a difference of 2.40 (1.04; 3.76) points (p < 0.001). Both treatments were well tolerated; eructation was the most frequent adverse effect of silexan. The study confirms the antidepressant efficacy of silexan in mild or moderate MDD, including significant improvements in the subjects' functional capacity. The results for sertraline confirm the assay sensitivity of the trial. Both drugs were well tolerated.Trial registrationEudraCT2020-000688-22 first entered on 12/08/2020.

Patient characteristics, validity of clinical diagnoses and Outcomes Associated with Suicidality in Inpatients with Symptoms of Depression (OASIS-D): design, procedures and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Suicidality, ranging from passive suicidal thoughts to suicide attempt, is common in major depressive disorder (MDD). However, relatively little is known about patient, illness and treatment characteristics in those with co-occurring MDD and suicidality, including the timing of and factors associated with the offset, continuation or reemergence of suicidality. Here, we present the background, rationale, design and hypotheses of the Patient Characteristics, Validity of Clinical Diagnoses and Outcomes Associated with Suicidality in Inpatients with Symptoms of Depression (OASIS-D) study, an investigator-initiated, observational study, funded by Janssen-Cilag GmbH. METHODS/RESULTS: OASIS-D is an eight-site, six-month, cohort study of patients aged 18-75 hospitalized with MDD. Divided into three sub-studies and patient populations (PPs), OASIS-D will (i) systematically characterize approximately 4500 consecutively hospitalized patients with any form of unipolar depressive episode (PP1), (ii) evaluate the validity of the clinical diagnosis of moderate or severe unipolar depressive episode with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) and present suicidality (at least passive suicidal thoughts) present ≥ 48 h after admission with the Sheehan-Suicide Tracking Scale (S-STS), assessing also predictors of the diagnostic concordance/discordance of MDD in around 500 inpatients (PP2), and (iii) characterize and prospectively follow for 6 months 315 inpatients with a research-verified moderate or severe unipolar depressive episode and at least passive suicidal thoughts ≥ 48 h after admission, evaluating treatment and illness/response patterns at baseline, hospital discharge, 3 and 6 months. Exploratory objectives will describe the association between the number of days with suicidality and utilization of outpatient and inpatient care services, and structured assessments of factors influencing the risk of self-injurious behavior without suicidal intent, and of continuous, intermittent or remitted suicidality during the 6-month observation period. CONCLUSION: Despite their frequency and clinical relevance, relatively little is known about patient and treatment characteristics of individuals with MDD and suicidality, including factors moderating and mediating the outcome of both MDD and suicidality. Results of the OASIS-D study are hoped to improve the understanding of the frequency, correlates and 6-month naturalistic treatment and outcome trajectories of different levels of suicidality in hospitalized adults with MDD and suicidality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04404309 [ClinicalTrials.gov].

Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) in Patients with Depression Treated with Antidepressants: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

INTRODUCTION: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is the 4th most common cause of liver damage in Western countries and can be caused by antidepressants. METHODS: Against the background of increasing antidepressant prescriptions and increasing use of polypharmacy, we analyzed administered antidepressants and other pharmacological substances, liver toxicity, comorbid somatic secondary diseases together with the occurrence of DILI in a patient population of 6 centers throughout Germany. RESULTS: The majority of the enrolled 329 patients received polypharmacological treatment in an inpatient setting. During antidepressant treatment 5.1% of the patients had elevated serum transaminase levels, whereby exactly and not more than 1 criterion proposed to be indicative for DILI, was fulfilled by 3 patients (0.9%). DISCUSSION: During patient characterization it becomes clear that a sensitization for relevant risk constellations causing liver injury in MDD patients is relevant to prevent further serious adverse events.

HDAC1 links early life stress to schizophrenia-like phenotypes.

Schizophrenia is a devastating disease that arises on the background of genetic predisposition and environmental risk factors, such as early life stress (ELS). In this study, we show that ELS-induced schizophrenia-like phenotypes in mice correlate with a widespread increase of histone-deacetylase 1 (Hdac1) expression that is linked to altered DNA methylation. Hdac1 overexpression in neurons of the medial prefrontal cortex, but not in the dorsal or ventral hippocampus, mimics schizophrenia-like phenotypes induced by ELS. Systemic administration of an HDAC inhibitor rescues the detrimental effects of ELS when applied after the manifestation of disease phenotypes. In addition to the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, mice subjected to ELS exhibit increased Hdac1 expression in blood. Moreover, Hdac1 levels are increased in blood samples from patients with schizophrenia who had encountered ELS, compared with patients without ELS experience. Our data suggest that HDAC1 inhibition should be considered as a therapeutic approach to treat schizophrenia.

Investigating polygenic burden in age at disease onset in bipolar disorder: Findings from an international multicentric study.

OBJECTIVES: Bipolar disorder (BD) with early disease onset is associated with an unfavorable clinical outcome and constitutes a clinically and biologically homogenous subgroup within the heterogeneous BD spectrum. Previous studies have found an accumulation of early age at onset (AAO) in BD families and have therefore hypothesized that there is a larger genetic contribution to the early-onset cases than to late onset BD. To investigate the genetic background of this subphenotype, we evaluated whether an increased polygenic burden of BD- and schizophrenia (SCZ)-associated risk variants is associated with an earlier AAO in BD patients. METHODS: A total of 1995 BD type 1 patients from the Consortium of Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen), PsyCourse and Bonn-Mannheim samples were genotyped and their BD and SCZ polygenic risk scores (PRSs) were calculated using the summary statistics of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium as a training data set. AAO was either separated into onset groups of clinical interest (childhood and adolescence [≤18 years] vs adulthood [>18 years]) or considered as a continuous measure. The associations between BD- and SCZ-PRSs and AAO were evaluated with regression models. RESULTS: BD- and SCZ-PRSs were not significantly associated with age at disease onset. Results remained the same when analyses were stratified by site of recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: The current study is the largest conducted so far to investigate the association between the cumulative BD and SCZ polygenic risk and AAO in BD patients. The reported negative results suggest that such a polygenic influence, if there is any, is not large, and highlight the importance of conducting further, larger scale studies to obtain more information on the genetic architecture of this clinically relevant phenotype.

A Novel Study Design to Systematically Explore the Impact of Trial Methodology on Psychopharmacological Treatment Outcome in Patients with Depression.

INTRODUCTION: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were developed to draw rather unbiased conclusions regarding the efficacy of antidepressants in the treatment of a major depressive episode (internal validity), mostly with the purpose of formal approval of new compounds in this indication. However, at the same time, data suggest that the very process of randomization and blinded administrations of placebo will have a significant impact on the efficacy of the antidepressant tested and therefore may limit the external validity of results obtained from this type of studies. Therefore, there is an urgent need to systematically study the impact of randomization/placebo control/blinding on patient population, efficacy, tolerability, and external validity in the psychopharmacological treatment of patients with a major depressive episode. METHODS: To develop a study design that allows the systematic exploration of the impact of trial design on characteristics of included patient population and outcome. RESULTS: We propose a study design including sample size calculation and statistical analysis in which patients with a major depressive episode are randomized to 3 distinct study designs that differ with regard to control, randomization, and blindness. DISCUSSION: The results of the proposed study design may have substantial consequences when it comes to how to best interpret the results of traditional randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder. Furthermore, they may lead to the implementation of new study designs that may be more suitable for assessing the effectiveness of new antidepressant compounds in everyday clinical practice.

A longitudinal approach to biological psychiatric research: The PsyCourse study.

In current diagnostic systems, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are still conceptualized as distinct categorical entities. Recently, both clinical and genomic evidence have challenged this Kraepelinian dichotomy. There are only few longitudinal studies addressing potential overlaps between these conditions. Here, we present design and first results of the PsyCourse study (N = 891 individuals at baseline), an ongoing transdiagnostic study of the affective-to-psychotic continuum that combines longitudinal deep phenotyping and dimensional assessment of psychopathology with an extensive collection of biomaterial. To provide an initial characterization of the PsyCourse study sample, we compare two broad diagnostic groups defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) classification system, that is, predominantly affective (n = 367 individuals) versus predominantly psychotic disorders (n = 524 individuals). Depressive, manic, and psychotic symptoms as well as global functioning over time were contrasted using linear mixed models. Furthermore, we explored the effects of polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia on diagnostic group membership and addressed their effects on nonparticipation in follow-up visits. While phenotypic results confirmed expected differences in current psychotic symptoms and global functioning, both manic and depressive symptoms did not vary between both groups after correction for multiple testing. Polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia significantly explained part of the variability of diagnostic group. The PsyCourse study presents a unique resource to research the complex relationships of psychopathology and biology in severe mental disorders not confined to traditional diagnostic boundaries and is open for collaborations.

Stress management and the role of Rhodiola rosea: a review.

Objective: Stress describes the physiological reaction to threat or pressure, which manifests as physical symptoms of exhaustion or energy loss and psychological symptoms, including irritability or tension. If untreated, chronic stress or burnout may develop, both are areas of unmet medical need. Evidence-based treatment and prevention measures are needed. Methods: Prevention strategies and existing treatment options for stress-related symptoms were evaluated to establish criteria for an adequate pharmacological approach to stress. The authors reviewed the literature to reach a clinically meaningful strategy for prevention and treatment of persistent stress symptoms and their consequences, including burnout and secondary diseases. Results: Current medication reveals a treatment gap. Most drugs target only psychological or physical stress symptoms. Furthermore, psychotropic medications sometimes prescribed for stress often have unacceptable side effects and bear a risk of overtreatment. Ideally pharmacological therapy should afford comprehensive treatment of all stress symptoms with a favourable safety profile. Conclusions: Rhodiola rosea extract (RRE) fulfils important requirements. It is the main adaptogen approved by the HMPC/EMA for the indication 'stress' and influences the release of stress hormones while boosting energy metabolism as revealed in animal literature. RRE offers comprehensive treatment of stress symptoms and can prevent chronic stress and stress-related complications.

Lamotrigine compared to placebo and other agents with antidepressant activity in patients with unipolar and bipolar depression: a comprehensive meta-analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes in short-term trials.

OBJECTIVES: To meta-analytically summarize lamotrigine's effectiveness and safety in unipolar and bipolar depression. METHODS: We conducted systematic PubMed and SCOPUS reviews (last search =10/01/2015) of randomized controlled trials comparing lamotrigine to placebo or other agents with antidepressant activity in unipolar or bipolar depression. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of depression ratings, response, remission, and adverse effects calculating standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) ±95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Eighteen studies (n=2152, duration=9.83 weeks) in patients with unipolar depression (studies=4, n=187; monotherapy vs lithium=1, augmentation of antidepressants vs placebo=3) or bipolar depression (studies=14, n=1965; monotherapy vs placebo=5, monotherapy vs lithium or olanzapine+fluoxetine=2, augmentation of antidepressants vs placebo=1, augmentation of mood stabilizers vs placebo=3, augmentation of mood stabilizers vs trancylpromine, citalopram, or inositol=3) were meta-analyzed. Lamotrigine's efficacy for depressive symptoms did not differ significantly in monotherapy vs augmentation studies (vs. placebo: p=0.98, I2=0%; vs active agents: p=0.48, I2=0%) or in unipolar vs bipolar patients (vs placebo: p=0.60, I2=0%), allowing pooling of each placebo-controlled and active-controlled trials. Lamotrigine outperformed placebo regarding depressive symptoms (studies=11, n=713 vs n=696; SMD=-0.15, 95% CI=-0.27, -0.02, p=0.02, heterogeneity: p=0.24) and response (after removing one extreme outlier; RR=1.42, 95% CI=1.13-1.78; p=0.003, heterogeneity: p=0.08). Conversely, lamotrigine did not differ regarding efficacy on depressive symptoms, response, or remission from lithium, olanzapine+fluoxetine, citalopram, or inositol (studies=6, n=306 vs n=318, p-values=0.85-0.92). Adverse effects and all-cause/specific-cause discontinuation were similar across all comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Lamotrigine was superior to placebo in improving unipolar and bipolar depressive symptoms, without causing more frequent adverse effects/discontinuations. Lamotrigine did not differ from lithium, olanzapine+fluoxetine, citalopram, or inositol.

Association of VMAT2 gene polymorphisms with alcohol dependence.

Alcohol-related diseases cause significant harm in the western world. Up to 65 % of the phenotypic variance is genetically determined. Few candidate genes have been identified, comprising ADH4, ALDH2, COMT, CRHR1, DAT (SLC6A3), GABRA2 and MAOA. While abnormalities in the dopaminergic mesolimbic reward system are considered important mediators of alcoholism, studies analyzing variants of dopamine receptors showed conflicting results. Other modulators of the reward system are synaptosomal genes. Among candidate genes, polygenic variants of the Vesicular Monamine Transporter 2 (VMAT2) gene locus associated with alterations of drinking behavior were published. These variants comprise single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the promoter region and the open reading frame. In this study, we confirm the association of VMAT2 SNP rs363387 (allelic association: p = 0.015) with alcohol dependence. This SNP defines several haplotypes including up to four SNPs (minimal p = 0.0045). In addition, numeric effects in the subgroups of males and patients with positive family history were found. We suggest that several rs363387 T-allele containing haplotypes increase the risk of alcohol dependence (OR 1.53), whereas G-allele containing haplotypes confer protection against alcohol dependence. Taken together, there is supporting evidence for a contribution of VMAT2 gene variants to phenotypes of alcohol dependence.

The "DGPPN-Cohort": A national collaboration initiative by the German Association for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (DGPPN) for establishing a large-scale cohort of psychiatric patients.

The German Association for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (DGPPN) has committed itself to establish a prospective national cohort of patients with major psychiatric disorders, the so-called DGPPN-Cohort. This project will enable the scientific exploitation of high-quality data and biomaterial from psychiatric patients for research. It will be set up using harmonised data sets and procedures for sample generation and guided by transparent rules for data access and data sharing regarding the central research database. While the main focus lies on biological research, it will be open to all kinds of scientific investigations, including epidemiological, clinical or health-service research.

Childhood maltreatment and adult proinflammatory status in patients with major depression.

BACKGROUND: An increasing body of research considers the immunological effects of major depression. It remains an open question, whether depression itself acts in an immunomodulatory fashion or whether other factors related to depression result in these immunological effects. Regardless, major depression is often the result of early life stress, the implications of which are not satisfactorily understood. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Early life stress was retrospectively evaluated in 25 depressed inpatients via the CTQ (Childhood Trauma Questionnaire). Its impact on immunological biomarkers (fibrinogen, SAA, CRP, adiponectin, TNF-α, resistin, and sE-selectin) in adulthood was assessed via multiple regression analyses. Parental bonding was assessed via the PBI (Parental bonding questionnaire), severity of depression with the HDRS-17 (Hamilton-Depression-Rating Scale). RESULTS: Nearly all patients had experienced a parental style of affectionless control. Physical neglect significantly predicted fibrinogen levels (R(2)=0.42, adjusted R(2)=0.27, ß=0.56, p=0.04). Severity of depression was not associated with immune markers. CONCLUSION: Childhood maltreatment was linked to fibrinogen levels in our sample. Thus, inflammation may be an important mechanism mediating the adverse effects of early life stress on adult health in patients with major depression.

Quetiapine as combination treatment with citalopram in unipolar depression with prominent somatic symptoms: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) accompanied by physical symptoms may be less responsive to antidepressant treatment. Quetiapine has been evaluated in the treatment of bipolar depression and has been recently approved as an add-on therapy for unipolar depression. Less is known about the efficacy of combination therapies in patients suffering from MDD with somatic symptoms. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of quetiapine as adjunctive therapy to the SSRI citalopram in patients with MDD and somatic complaints. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 41 inpatients with nonpsychotic DSM-IV MDD experiencing significant symptoms of somatic distress as defined by a baseline score on the SCL-90-R somatization subscale greater one standard deviation above adult nonpatient norms were randomly assigned to receive either citalopram 40 mg/day plus placebo (n=20) or citalopram 40 mg/day plus quetiapine, 300 to 600 mg/day (n=21) for 6 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score. RESULTS: Mean changes in HDRS scores from baseline to week 6 using last-observation-carried-forward methods were -12.3±6.2 and -10.7±5.1 in the citalopram-quetiapine and citalopram-placebo group, respectively. Remission rates were significant higher in the citalopram-quetiapine-group (41.1%) than in the citalopram-placebo-group (26.3%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although quetiapine as add-on to citalopram did not separate statistically from placebo on the HDRS score in improving depressive symptoms and somatic symptoms in patients with MDD and prominent somatic complaints, higher remission rates and other second outcome parameters showed advantages for quetiapine. Larger, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of quetiapine as augmentation therapy in MDD with somatic symptoms are warranted.

Association between mitochondria-related genes and cognitive performance in the PsyCourse Study.

BACKGROUND: Mitochondria generate energy through oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). The function of key OXPHOS proteins can be altered by variation in mitochondria-related genes, which may increase the risk of mental illness. We investigated the association of mitochondria-related genes and their genetic risk burden with cognitive performance. METHODS: We leveraged cross-sectional data from 1320 individuals with a severe psychiatric disorder and 466 neurotypical individuals from the PsyCourse Study. The cognitive tests analyzed were the Trail-Making Test, Verbal Digit Span Test, Digit-Symbol Test, and Multiple Choice Vocabulary Intelligence Test. Association analyses between the cognitive tests, and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) mapped to mitochondria-related genes, and their polygenic risk score (PRS) for schizophrenia (SCZ) were performed with PLINK 1.9 and R program. RESULTS: We found a significant association (FDR-adjusted p < 0.05) in the Cytochrome C Oxidase Assembly Factor 8 (COA8) gene locus of the OXPHOS pathway with the Verbal Digit Span (forward) test. Mitochondrial PRS was not significantly associated with any of the cognitive tests. LIMITATIONS: Moderate statistical power due to relatively small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: COA8 encodes a poorly characterized mitochondrial protein involved in apoptosis. Here, this gene was associated with the Verbal Digit Span (forward) test, which evaluates short-term memory. Our results warrant replication and may lead to better understanding of cognitive impairment in mental disorders.

Medication adherence and cognitive performance in schizophrenia-spectrum and bipolar disorder: results from the PsyCourse Study.

Existing guidelines recommend psychopharmacological treatment for the management of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder as part of holistic treatment concepts. About half of the patients do not take their medication regularly, although treatment adherence can prevent exacerbations and re-hospitalizations. To date, the relationship between medication adherence and cognitive performance is understudied. Therefore, this study investigated the relationship between medication adherence and cognitive performance by analyzing the data of 862 participants with schizophrenia-spectrum and bipolar disorders (mean [SD] age, 41.9 [12.48] years; 44.8% female) from a multicenter study (PsyCourse Study). Z-scores for three cognitive domains were calculated, global functioning was measured with the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, and adherence was assessed by a self-rating questionnaire. We evaluated four multiple linear regression models and built three clusters with hierarchical cluster analyses. Higher adherence behavior (p < 0.001) was associated with better global functioning but showed no impact on the cognitive domains learning and memory, executive function, and psychomotor speed. The hierarchical cluster analysis resulted in three clusters with different cognitive performances, but patients in all clusters showed similar adherence behavior. The study identified cognitive subgroups independent of diagnoses, but no differences were found in the adherence behavior of the patients in these new clusters. In summary, medication adherence was associated with global but not cognitive functioning in patients with schizophrenia-spectrum and bipolar disorders. In both diagnostic groups, cognitive function might be influenced by various factors but not medication adherence.