How often are infusion sets for central venous catheters changed in Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Units? A point prevalence survey.

BACKGROUND: Infusion sets (comprising the tubing, measuring burettes, fluid containers, transducers) that are connected to invasive vascular devices are changed on a regular basis in an effort to reduce bacterial colonisation and bloodstream infection. There is a balance between reducing infection and creating unnecessary waste. Current evidence suggests that for central venous catheters (CVCs), changing infusion sets at 7 days does not increase infection risks. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to describe the current unit guidelines in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units (ICUs) for changing infusion sets for CVCs. METHODS: prospective cross-sectional point prevalence study, as a part of the 2021 Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Point Prevalence Program. PARTICIPANTS: Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) adult ICUs and their patients on the day of the study. RESULTS: Data were collected from 51 ICUs across ANZ. One-third of these (16/49) ICUs had a guideline that specified a 7-day replacement period, with the rest having a more frequent replacement period. CONCLUSION: Most ICUs participating in this survey had policies to change their CVC infusion tubing in 3-4 days, and recent high-level evidence supports an update to extend this to 7 days. There remains work to be done to spread this evidence to ANZ ICUs and improve environmental sustainability initiatives.

Duration and management of sepsis-associated hypotension at rapid response team call-outs to patients subsequently admitted to the intensive care unit: A case series.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis-related hypotension in hospital patients is a common reason for rapid response team (RRT) attendance and transfer to intensive care, but little is known about the duration and management of hypotension during these RRT call-outs. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe the duration and management of hypotension during RRT call-outs to patients with sepsis-related hypotension who required transfer to intensive care. METHODS: RRT call-outs during 2018 for hypotension with transfer to intensive care were identified from a prospectively maintained database of RRT call-outs at a single tertiary hospital. From these, the records of a random sample of 60 cases were reviewed, and those attributed to sepsis and without missing data were described. Hypotension was defined as systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg. RESULTS: There were 117 RRT call-outs for hypotension with transfer to intensive care, and of the 60 cases randomly chosen for further review, 41 were deemed sepsis related and were not missing data. The average age of the patients was 62 years, and 18 (44%) were already receiving antibiotics. The median time to arrival in the intensive care unit was 47 minutes. Patients were hypotensive for approximately two-thirds of their RRT time, despite 88% receiving some initial resuscitative treatments (fluids and/or vasopressors). Thirty-two (78%) were treated with intravenous fluids, and 20 (49%), with vasopressors. Patients spent 3 [2-4] days in intensive care, and 7 (17%) died in hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with sepsis-related hypotension requiring an RRT call and transfer to intensive care remain hypotensive for a substantial duration of the call. This concept of adequacy of resuscitation after rapid response calls needs further exploration in a larger study.

Intensive care doctors and nurses personal preferences for Intensive Care, as compared to the general population: a discrete choice experiment.

BACKGROUND: To test the hypothesis that Intensive Care Unit (ICU) doctors and nurses differ in their personal preferences for treatment from the general population, and whether doctors and nurses make different choices when thinking about themselves, as compared to when they are treating a patient. METHODS: Cross sectional, observational study conducted in 13 ICUs in Australia in 2017 using a discrete choice experiment survey. Respondents completed a series of choice sets, based on hypothetical situations which varied in the severity or likelihood of: death, cognitive impairment, need for prolonged treatment, need for assistance with care or requiring residential care. RESULTS: A total of 980 ICU staff (233 doctors and 747 nurses) participated in the study. ICU staff place the highest value on avoiding ending up in a dependent state. The ICU staff were more likely to choose to discontinue therapy when the prognosis was worse, compared with the general population. There was consensus between ICU staff personal views and the treatment pathway likely to be followed in 69% of the choices considered by nurses and 70% of those faced by doctors. In 27% (1614/5945 responses) of the nurses and 23% of the doctors (435/1870 responses), they felt that aggressive treatment would be continued for the hypothetical patient but they would not want that for themselves. CONCLUSION: The likelihood of returning to independence (or not requiring care assistance) was reported as the most important factor for ICU staff (and the general population) in deciding whether to receive ongoing treatments. Goals of care discussions should focus on this, over likelihood of survival.

Recognising and responding to deteriorating patients: what difference do national standards make?

BACKGROUND: The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care released a set of national standards which became a mandatory part of accreditation in 2013. Standard 9 focuses on the identification and treatment of deteriorating patients. The objective of the study was to identify changes in the characteristics and perceptions of rapid response systems (RRS) since the implementation of Standard 9. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of Australian hospitals. Baseline data was obtained from a pre-implementation survey in 2010 (220 hospitals). A follow-up survey was distributed in 2015 to staff involved in implementing Standard 9 in public and private hospitals (276 responses) across Australia. RESULTS: Since 2010, the proportion of hospitals with formal RRS had increased from 66 to 85. Only 7% of sites had dedicated funding to operate the RRS. 83% of respondents reported that Standard 9 had improved the recognition of, and response to, deteriorating patients in their health service, with 51% believing it had improved awareness at the executive level and 50% believing it had changed hospital culture. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a national safety and quality standard for deteriorating patients can change processes to deliver safer care, while raising the profile of safety issues. Despite limited dedicated funding and staffing, respondents reported that Standard 9 had a positive impact on the care for deteriorating patients in their hospitals.

A comparison of the opinions of intensive care unit staff and family members of the treatment intensity received by patients admitted to an intensive care unit: A multicentre survey.

BACKGROUND: Achieving shared decision-making in the intensive care unit (ICU) is challenging because of limited patient capacity, leading to a reliance on surrogate decision-makers. Prior research shows that ICU staff members often perceive that patients receive inappropriate or futile treatments while some surrogate decision-makers of patients admitted to the ICU report inadequate communication with physicians. Therefore, understanding the perceptions of both ICU staff and surrogate decision-makers around wishes for ICU treatments is an essential component to improve these situations. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to compare perceptions of ICU staff with surrogate decision-makers about the intensity and appropriateness of treatments received by patients and analyse the causes of any incongruence. METHODS: A multicentred, single-day survey of staff and surrogate decision-makers of ICU inpatients was conducted across four Australian ICUs in 2014. Patients were linked to a larger prospective observational study, allowing comparison of patient outcomes. RESULTS: Twelve of 32 patients were identified as having a mismatch between staff and surrogate decision-maker perceptions. For these 12 patients, all 12 surrogate decision-makers believed that the treatment intensity the patient was receiving was of the appropriate intensity and duration. Mismatched patients were more likely to be emergency admissions to ICU compared with nonmismatched patients (0.0% vs 42.1%, p = 0.012) and have longer ICU admissions (7.5 vs 3, p = 0.022). There were no significant differences in perceived communication (p = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Family members did not share the same perceptions of treatment with ICU staff. This may result from difficulty in prognostication; challenges in conveying poor prognoses to surrogate decision-makers; and the accuracy of surrogate decision-makers.

Effect of a National Standard for Deteriorating Patients on Intensive Care Admissions Due to Cardiac Arrest in Australia.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether a national standard for improving care of deteriorating patients affected ICU admissions following cardiac arrests from hospital wards. DESIGN: Retrospective study assessing changes from baseline (January 1, 2008, to June 30, 2010), rollout (July 1, 2010, to December 31, 2012), and after (January 1, 2013, to 31 December 31, 2014) national standard introduction. Conventional inferential statistics, interrupted time series analysis, and adjusted hierarchical multiple logistic regression analysis. SETTING: More than 110 ICU-equipped Australian hospitals. PATIENTS OR SUBJECTS: Adult patients (≥ 18 yr old) admitted to participating ICUs. INTERVENTIONS: Introducing a national framework to improve care of deteriorating patients including color-coded observation charts, mandatory rapid response system, enhanced governance, and staff education for managing deteriorating patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cardiac arrest-related ICU admissions from the ward decreased from 5.6% (baseline) to 4.9% (rollout) and 4.1% (intervention period). Interrupted time series analysis revealed a decline in the rate of cardiac arrest-related ICU admissions in the rollout period, compared with the baseline period (p = 0.0009) with a subsequent decrease in the rate in the intervention period (p = 0.01). Cardiac arrest-related ICU admissions were less likely in the intervention period compared with the baseline period (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93; p = 0.001), as was in-hospital mortality from cardiac arrests (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65-0.96; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Introducing a national standard to improve the care of deteriorating patients was associated with reduced cardiac arrest-related ICU admissions and subsequent in-hospital mortality of such patients.

Midodrine as adjunctive support for treatment of refractory hypotension in the intensive care unit: a multicenter, randomized, placebo controlled trial (the MIDAS trial).

BACKGROUND: Patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) are often treated with intravenous (IV) vasopressors. Persistent hypotension and dependence on IV vasopressors in otherwise resuscitated patients lead to delay in discharge from ICU. Midodrine is an oral alpha-1 adrenergic agonist approved for treatment of symptomatic orthostatic hypotension. This trial aims to evaluate whether oral administration of midodrine is an effective adjunct to standard therapy to reduce the duration of IV vasopressor treatment, and allow earlier discharge from ICU and hospital. METHODS: The MIDAS trial is an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial being conducted in the USA and Australia. We are targeting 120 patients. Adult patients admitted to the ICU who are resuscitated and otherwise stable on low dose IV vasopressors for at least 24 h will be considered for recruitment. Participants will be randomized to receive midodrine (20 mg) or placebo three times a day, in addition to standard care. The primary outcome is time (hours) from initiation of midodrine or placebo to discontinuation of IV vasopressors. Secondary outcomes include time (hours) from ICU admission to discharge readiness, ICU length of stay (LOS) (days), hospital LOS (days), rates of ICU readmission, and rates of adverse events related to midodrine administration. DISCUSSION: Midodrine is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of symptomatic orthostatic hypotension. In August 2010, FDA proposed to withdraw approval of midodrine because of lack of studies that verify the clinical benefit of the drug. We obtained Investigational New Drug (IND 113,330) approval to study its effects in critically ill patients who require IV vasopressors but are otherwise ready for discharge from the ICU. A pilot observational study in a cohort of surgical ICU patients showed that the rate of decline in vasopressor requirements increased after initiation of midodrine treatment. We hypothesize that midodrine administration is effective to wean IV vasopressors and shorten ICU and hospital LOS. This trial may have significant implications on lowering costs of hospital care and obtaining FDA approval for new indications for midodrine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov on 02/09/2012 (NCT01531959).

Perceptions of the appropriateness of care in California adult intensive care units.

INTRODUCTION: Increased demand for expensive intensive care unit (ICU) services may contribute to rising health-care costs. A focus on appropriate use may offer a clinically meaningful way of finding the balance. We aimed to determine the extent and characteristics of perceived inappropriate treatment among ICU doctors and nurses, defined as an imbalance between the amount or intensity of treatments being provided and the patient's expected prognosis or wishes. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of doctors and nurses providing care to patients in 56 adult ICUs in California between May and August 2013. In total, 1,363 doctors and nurses completed an anonymous electronic survey. RESULTS: Thirty-eight percent of 1,169 respondents (95% confidence interval (CI) 35% to 41%, 51.1% of physicians and 35.8% of nurses) identified at least one patient as receiving inappropriate treatment. Respondents most commonly reported that the amount of treatment provided was disproportionate to the patient's expected prognosis or wishes-325 out of 429 (76%, 95% CI 72% to 80%)--and that treatment was 'too much' in 93% of cases. Factors associated with perceived inappropriateness of treatment were the belief that death in their ICU is seen as a failure (odds ratio (OR) 5.75, 95% CI 2.28 to 14.53, P = 0.000), profession (doctors more than nurses) (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.97, P = 0.000), lack of collaboration between doctors and nurses (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.80, P = 0.004), intent to leave their job (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.55, P = 0.005), and the perceived responsibility to control health-care costs (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.33, P = 0.026). Providers supported formal communication training (90%, 95% CI 88% to 92%) and mandatory family meetings (89%, 95% CI 87% to 91%) as potential solutions to reduce the provision of inappropriate treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Doctors and nurses working in California ICUs frequently perceive treatment to be inappropriate. They also identified measures that could reduce the provision of inappropriate treatment.

Hospitals should be exemplars of healthy workplaces.

As major employers and flagship health care organisations, hospitals can influence the norms of the communities they serve by adopting model policies and practices that promote the health of patients, visitors, employees, students and trainees. Hospitals must become healthy workplaces in every sense and extend their role to focus on health and wellness, not just illness. Reorienting hospital policies can: ensure the provision and stewardship of healthy, ecologically sound and sustainable environments; increase the focus on promoting health and prevention; foster interpersonal safety; and improve workplace safety. Such efforts deliver improvements in health outcomes and savings in hospital budgets.

Can we learn anything from health care in the United States?

Some aspects of health care in the United States would be beneficial to Australia and New Zealand, but others should be avoided. Positive aspects, which should be emulated, include: •health care reform that is focused on the continuum of care and patient-centred care •trials of new models to organise, deliver and pay for health care services, where quality of care is rewarded over quantity of services •an integral view of, and strong support for, health services research as a means of evaluating reforms aimed at improving patient outcomes and systems-level efficiencies •physician engagement in reforms--for example, participating in the Choosing Wisely initiative, and trialling and implementing new payment models that are not fee-for-service. Negative aspects, which should be avoided, include: •increasingly fragmented provider and financing structures (funding provided by state and federal governments, private insurance and out-of-pocket costs) that cause frustration in terms of access and care coordination and increase administrative waste •an overemphasis on technological solutions, with insufficient acknowledgment of the importance of addressing value in health care •a focus on hospital and doctor-based health care rather than environmental and social inputs into health.

Do outlier inpatients experience more emergency calls in hospital? An observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of spending time as an outlier (ie, an inpatient who spends time away from his or her "home" ward) on the frequency of emergency calls for patients admitted to a tertiary referral hospital. DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: Observational cohort study of all patients admitted to a university-affiliated tertiary referral hospital in Melbourne, Victoria, between 1 July 2009 and 30 November 2011. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The number of emergency calls per hospital admission, with reference to location within the hospital. RESULTS: There were 58,158 admissions during the study period. The median age of admitted patients was 61 years, 55% were male, and the inhospital mortality was 1.40%. In 11,034 admissions (18.97%), patients spent time as outliers. Inhospital mortality was 2.57% in the outlier group versus 1.12% in the non-outlier group (P < 0.001). After adjusting for age, same-day admission, 10-year predicted mortality, interhospital transfer and high-risk clinical units, outlier status was associated with a 53% increase in emergency calls (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study found a strong association between time spent away from a patient's home ward and the number of emergency calls. We postulate that outlier patients are at risk as they may have therapeutic and monitoring needs that are only available on their home ward. With increasing pressure to move patients out of the emergency department, the number of outlier patients may increase.

Climate change and health--what's the problem?

The scientific consensus is that global warming is occurring and is largely the result of greenhouse gas emissions from human activity. This paper examines the health implications of global warming, the current socio-political attitudes towards action on climate change and highlight the health co-benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, policy development for climate change and health should embrace health systems strengthening, commencing by incorporating climate change targets into Millennium Development Goal 7.

The hidden cost of private health insurance in Australia.

The provision of health services in Australia currently is primarily financed by a unique interaction of public and private insurers. This commentary looks at a loophole in this framework, namely that private insurers have to date been able to avoid funding healthcare for some of their policy holders, as it is not a requirement to use private insurance when treatment occurs in Australian public hospitals.

Hypercalcaemia of Immobility in Critically Ill Patients: Case Series.

Significant hypercalcaemia can occur in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Immobilisation hypercalcaemia has been infrequently reported after ICU admission. Patients, therefore, usually require extensive workup to rule out other common causes of hypercalcaemia, such as hyperparathyroidism. A case series of five patients who were diagnosed with hypercalcaemia due to immobilisation and received treatment with pamidronate between 2019 and 2023 were reported. The majority of cases were assessed as having hypercalcaemia due to immobilisation in the setting of low to normal parathyroid hormone levels, no suspicion of malignancy, and absence of other possible causative factors. Treatment with pamidronate started 10 to 60 days after hypercalcaemia was identified, and one or two doses of 30 mg of pamidronate were successful in resolving it. Immobilisation hypercalcaemia following ICU admission was uncommon but treatable with pamidronate.

Intravenous vitamin C for vasoplegia: A double-blinded randomised clinical trial (VALENCIA trial).

PURPOSE: To determine whether intravenous vitamin C compared with placebo, reduces vasopressor requirements in patients with vasoplegic shock. METHODS: Double-blinded, randomised clinical trial (RCT) conducted in two intensive care units in Perth, Australia. Vasopressor requirements at enrolment needed to be >10 µg/min noradrenaline after hypovolaemia was clinically excluded. Patients received either intravenous 1.5 g sodium ascorbate in 100 ml normal saline every 6 h for 5 days, or placebo (100 ml normal saline). The primary outcome was duration of vasopressor usage in hours. Secondary outcomes were ICU and hospital length of stay, and 28-day, ICU and hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of the 71 patients randomised (35 vitamin C, 36 placebo group), the median vasopressor duration was 44 h [95% CI, 37-54 h] and 55 h [95% CI, 33-66 h]) in the vitamin C and placebo groups (p = 0.057). ICU and hospital length of stay, mortality outcomes were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this RCT of patients with vasoplegic shock of at least moderate severity, the use of IV vitamin C compared with placebo did not significantly reduce the duration of vasopressors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospective registration - trial number ACTRN12617001392358.

Oral midodrine does not expedite liberation from protracted vasopressor infusions: A case-control study.

Vasopressor dependence is a common problem affecting patients in the recovery phase of critical illness, often necessitating intensive care unit (ICU) admission and other interventions which carry associated risks. Midodrine is an orally administered vasopressor which is commonly used off-label to expedite weaning from vasopressor infusions and facilitate discharge from ICU. We performed a single-centre, case-control study to assess whether midodrine accelerated liberation from vasopressor infusions in patients who were vasopressor dependent. Cases were identified at the discretion of treating intensivists and received 20 mg oral midodrine every eight h from enrolment. Controls received placebo. Data on duration and dose of vasopressor infusion, haemodynamics and adverse events were collected. Between 2012 and 2019, 42 controls and 19 cases were recruited. Cases had received vasopressor infusions for a median of 94 h versus 29.3 h for controls, indicating prolonged vasopressor dependence amongst cases. Midodrine use in cases was not associated with faster weaning of intravenous (IV) vasopressors (26 h versus 24 h for controls, P = 0.51), ICU or hospital length of stay after adjustment for confounders. Midodrine did not affect mean heart rate but was associated with bradycardia. This case-control study demonstrates that midodrine has limited efficacy in expediting weaning from vasopressor infusions in patients who have already received relatively prolonged courses of these infusions.

How much do we throw away in the intensive care unit? An observational point prevalence study of Australian and New Zealand ICUs.

Objective: During the current COVID pandemic, waste generation has been more evident with increased use of single use masks, gowns and other personal protective equipment. We aimed to understand the scale of waste generation, recycling rates and participation in Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) ICUs. Design: This is a prospective cross-sectional point prevalence study, as part of the 2021 ANZICS Point Prevalence Program. Specific questions related to waste and sustainability practices were asked at the site and patient level. Setting and participants: ANZ adult ICUs and their patients on the day of the study. Main outcome measures: Amount of single use items disposed of per shift, as well as the engagement of the site with sustainability and recycling practices. Results: In total, 712 patients (median number of patients per ICU = 17, IQR 11-30) from 51 ICUs across ANZ were included in our study; 55% of hospitals had a sustainability officer, and recycling paper (86%) and plastics (65%) were frequent, but metal recycling was limited (27%). Per patient bed space per 12-h shift there was recycling of less than 40% paper, glass, intravenous fluid bags, medication cups and metal instruments. A median of 10 gowns (IQR 3-19.5), 10 syringes (4.5-18) and gloves 30 (18-49) were disposed of per bed space, per 12-h shift. These numbers increased significantly when comparing patients with and without infection control precautions in place. Conclusions: In ANZ ICUs, we found utilisation of common ICU consumables to be high and associated with low recycling rates. Interventions to abate resource utilisation and augment recycling are required to improve environmental sustainability in intensive care units.

Sleep Faster! (Somebody else needs your blanket...).

One of the elements of the health reform plan, as agreed to by Australian state and federal governments, is to introduce a 4-h National Access Target, to reduce emergency department (ED) waiting times. This article highlights the flawed rationale behind the 4-h rule, the UK experience of this rule and discusses the potential dangers it poses to Australian patients. An alternative solution proposed is the separation of elective and emergency surgical streams to reduce the variability in demand for inpatient services.