Is supine a preferred position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the pediatric age group? A randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The aim is to evaluate supine versus prone position in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric renal urolithiasis management. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was constructed to evaluate supine versus prone position in pediatric PCNL. Seventy pediatric patients with a stone burden ≥1.5 cm were randomized into two groups. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were available for evaluation in our study with no significant difference in the perioperative demographic data. The supine group showed a shorter operation time of 43.9 min compared to 73.5 min in the prone group. The stone-free rate was higher in the supine group, with a 93.9% SFR compared to 83.3% in the prone group. The supine group showed a shorter hospital stay of 2.0±1.0 days, compared to 3.20±1.56 days in the prone group. No significant difference was seen in the perioperative complication rate and fluoroscopy time between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy is safe and effective in managing pediatric renal stones, with a higher stone-free rate, less operative time, and less hospital stay compared to the prone position.

Clinical efficacy of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of upper urinary tract calculus (1-2.5 cm) in children ≤10 years of age.

BACKGROUND: With improvements in endoscopic surgery, open surgical procedures for urinary system stones have cleared the path for the use of less invasive treatment modalities in patients with pediatric kidney stone disease. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are among the treatment options available. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the outcomes of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for children ≤10 years of age with upper urinary tract calculus (1-2.5 cm). STUDY DESIGN: Sixty pediatric patients with single or multiple renal stones (1-2.5 cm in diameter) were collected prospectively and equally divided into two groups to undergo RIRS or mini-PCNL. The operative and postoperative outcomes of both groups were analyzed. RESULTS: The groups' mean ages and genders were comparable. The mean stone size for the RIRS group was 1.86 cm and 1.69 cm for the PCNL group (P = 0.449). The PCNL group had statistically longer mean fluoroscopy and hospitalization times. The stone-free rates (SFRs) after a single procedure were 27 (90%) in the PCNL group and 25 (83.33%) in the RIRS group (P = 0.706). The UAS was placed in 13 (43.33%) patients in the RIRS group. In the RIRS group, 14 (46.67%) children required preoperative DJ stent application to passively dilate the ureteric orifice. As regard post DJ stenting, 13 (46%) cases applied DJ in the mini PCNL group. major complications were observed in either group. Minor complication (Clavien 1-3) rates were 16.66% and 13.33% for the PCNL and RIRS groups, respectively. There were no differences found between the RIRS and mini-PCNL groups regarding operative time. The mean cost of RIRS was $703.96 and $537.03 for the mini-PCNL. CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, mini-PCNL and RIRS are effective procedures for treating renal stones in children up to 2.5 cm with comparable success and complication rates. Hospital stay, radiation exposure, and fluoroscopy time are significantly lower in RIRS than in the mini PCNL technique. Although RIRS is effective, a major disadvantage is the greater requirement for JJ stent insertion either before or after the procedure and the consequent need for a second procedure for removal.