Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Nucl Cardiol ; 27(2): 465-478, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30168029

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Consistency of results between different readers is an important issue in medical imaging, as it affects portability of results between institutions and may affect patient care. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in pursuing its mission of fostering peaceful applications of nuclear technologies has supported several training activities in the field of nuclear cardiology (NC) and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in particular. The aim of this study was to verify the outcome of those activities through an international clinical audit on MPI where participants were requested to report on studies distributed from a core lab. METHODS: The study was run in two phases: in phase 1, SPECT MPI studies were distributed as raw data and full processing was requested as per local practice. In phase 2, images from studies pre-processed at the core lab were distributed. Data to be reported included summed stress score (SSS); summed rest score (SRS); summed difference score (SDS); left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and end- diastolic volume (EDV). Qualitative appraisals included the assessment of perfusion and presence of ischemia, scar or mixed patterns, presence of transient ischemic dilation (TID), and risk for cardiac events (CE). Twenty-four previous trainees from low- and middle-income countries participated (core participants group) and their results were assessed for inter-observer variability in each of the two phases, and for changes between phases. The same evaluations were performed for a group of eleven international experts (experts group). Results were also compared between the groups. RESULTS: Expert readers showed an excellent level of agreement for all parameters in both phase 1 and 2. For core participants, the concordance of all parameters in phase 1 was rated as good to excellent. Two parameters which were re-evaluated in phase 2, namely SSS and SRS, showed an increased level of concordance, up to excellent in both cases. Reporting of categorical variables by expert readers remained almost unchanged between the two phases, while core participants showed an increase in phase 2. Finally, pooled LVEF values did not show a significant difference between core participants and experts. However, significant differences were found between LVEF values obtained using different software packages for cardiac analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, inter-observer agreement was moderate-to-good for core group readers and good-to-excellent for expert readers. The quality of reporting is affected by the quality of processing. These results confirm the important role of the IAEA training activities in improving imaging in low- and middle-income countries.


Assuntos
Imagem de Perfusão do Miocárdio/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único/métodos , Idoso , Tomografia Computadorizada por Emissão de Fóton Único de Sincronização Cardíaca , Países em Desenvolvimento , Teste de Esforço , Feminino , Geografia , Coração , Ventrículos do Coração , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imagem de Perfusão do Miocárdio/normas , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/métodos , Pobreza , Risco , Volume Sistólico , Tecnécio , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único/normas , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologia , Função Ventricular Esquerda
2.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 42(2): 328-54, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25452219

RESUMO

The purpose of these guidelines is to assist physicians in recommending, performing, interpreting and reporting the results of FDG PET/CT for oncological imaging of adult patients. PET is a quantitative imaging technique and therefore requires a common quality control (QC)/quality assurance (QA) procedure to maintain the accuracy and precision of quantitation. Repeatability and reproducibility are two essential requirements for any quantitative measurement and/or imaging biomarker. Repeatability relates to the uncertainty in obtaining the same result in the same patient when he or she is examined more than once on the same system. However, imaging biomarkers should also have adequate reproducibility, i.e. the ability to yield the same result in the same patient when that patient is examined on different systems and at different imaging sites. Adequate repeatability and reproducibility are essential for the clinical management of patients and the use of FDG PET/CT within multicentre trials. A common standardised imaging procedure will help promote the appropriate use of FDG PET/CT imaging and increase the value of publications and, therefore, their contribution to evidence-based medicine. Moreover, consistency in numerical values between platforms and institutes that acquire the data will potentially enhance the role of semiquantitative and quantitative image interpretation. Precision and accuracy are additionally important as FDG PET/CT is used to evaluate tumour response as well as for diagnosis, prognosis and staging. Therefore both the previous and these new guidelines specifically aim to achieve standardised uptake value harmonisation in multicentre settings.


Assuntos
Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Imagem Multimodal/métodos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/métodos , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Humanos
3.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 37(1): 181-200, 2010 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19915839

RESUMO

The aim of this guideline is to provide a minimum standard for the acquisition and interpretation of PET and PET/CT scans with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). This guideline will therefore address general information about[18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) and is provided to help the physician and physicist to assist to carrying out,interpret, and document quantitative FDG PET/CT examinations,but will concentrate on the optimisation of diagnostic quality and quantitative information.


Assuntos
Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Medicina Nuclear/normas , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Técnica de Subtração/normas , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/normas , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos
4.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 35(12): 2320-33, 2008 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18704407

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have shown the usefulness of positron emission tomography (PET) quantification using standardised uptake values (SUV) for diagnosis and staging, prognosis and response monitoring. Many factors affect SUV, such as patient preparation procedures, scan acquisition, image reconstruction and data analysis settings, and the variability in methodology across centres prohibits exchange of SUV data. Therefore, standardisation of 2-[(18)F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) PET whole body procedures is required in multi-centre trials. METHODS: A protocol for standardisation of quantitative FDG whole body PET studies in the Netherlands (NL) was defined. This protocol is based on standardisation of: (1) patient preparation; (2) matching of scan statistics by prescribing dosage as function of patient weight, scan time per bed position, percentage of bed overlap and image acquisition mode (2D or 3D); (3) matching of image resolution by prescribing reconstruction settings for each type of scanner; (4) matching of data analysis procedure by defining volume of interest methods and SUV calculations and; (5) finally, a multi-centre QC procedure is defined using a 20-cm diameter phantom for verification of scanner calibration and the NEMA NU 2 2001 Image Quality phantom for verification of activity concentration recoveries (i.e., verification of image resolution and reconstruction convergence). DISCUSSION: This paper describes a protocol for standardization of quantitative FDG whole body multi-centre PET studies. CONCLUSION: The protocol was successfully implemented in the Netherlands and has been approved by the Netherlands Society of Nuclear Medicine.


Assuntos
Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto/normas , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/normas , Imagem Corporal Total/normas , Peso Corporal , Cálculos da Dosagem de Medicamento , Fluordesoxiglucose F18/análise , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/normas , Países Baixos , Controle de Qualidade , Padrões de Referência , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA