RESUMO
Despite widespread vaccination rates, we are living with high transmission rates of SARS-CoV-2. Although overall hospitalisation rates are falling, the risk of serious infection remains high for patients who are immunocompromised because of haematological malignancies. In light of the ongoing pandemic and the development of multiple agents for treatment, representatives from the Haematology Society of Australia and New Zealand and infectious diseases specialists have collaborated on this consensus position statement regarding COVID-19 management in patients with haematological disorders. It is our recommendation that both patients with haematological malignancies and treating specialists be educated regarding the preventive and treatment options available and that patients continue to receive adequate vaccinations, keeping in mind the suboptimal vaccine responses that occur in haematology patients, in particular, those with B-cell malignancies and on B-cell-targeting or depleting therapy. Patients with haematological malignancies should receive treatment for COVID-19 in accordance with the severity of their symptoms, but even mild infections should prompt early treatment with antiviral agents. The issue of de-isolation following COVID-19 infection and optimal time to treatment for haematological malignancies is discussed but remains an area with evolving data. This position statement is to be used in conjunction with advice from infectious disease, respiratory and intensive care specialists, and current guidelines from the National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce and the New Zealand Ministry of Health and Cancer Agency Te Aho o Te Kahu COVID-19 Guidelines.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Consenso , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapiaRESUMO
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoma subtype, accounting for 30-40% of lymphoma diagnoses. Although aggressive, cure is achievable in approximately 60% of cases with primary chemoimmunotherapy, and in a further substantial minority by salvage therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Despite promising activity in early phase clinical trials, no intensified or novel treatment regimen has improved outcomes over R-CHOP21 in randomised studies. However, there remain several areas of controversy including the most appropriate prognostic markers, central nervous system prophylaxis and the optimal treatment for patients with high-risk disease. This position statement presents an evidence-based synthesis of the literature for application in Australasian practice.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Consenso , Humanos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/diagnóstico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Transplante AutólogoRESUMO
Australia and New Zealand have achieved excellent community control of COVID-19 infection. In light of the imminent COVID-19 vaccination roll out in both countries, representatives from the Haematology Society of Australia and New Zealand and infectious diseases specialists have collaborated on this consensus position statement regarding COVID-19 vaccination in patients with haematological disorders. It is our recommendation that patients with haematological malignancies, and some benign haematological disorders, should have expedited access to high-efficacy COVID-19 vaccines, given that these patients are at high risk of morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 infection. Vaccination should not replace other public health measures in these patients, given that the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination, specifically in patients with haematological malignancies, is not known. Given the limited available data, prospective collection of safety and efficacy data of COVID-19 vaccination in this patient group is a priority.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hematologia , Austrália/epidemiologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Consenso , Humanos , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , VacinaçãoRESUMO
The COVID-19 pandemic poses a unique challenge to the care of patients with haematological malignancies. Viral pneumonia is known to cause disproportionately severe disease in patients with cancer, and patients with lymphoma, myeloma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia are likely to be at particular risk of severe disease related to COVID-19. This statement has been developed by consensus among authors from Australia and New Zealand. We aim to provide supportive guidance to clinicians making individual patient decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic, in particular during periods that access to healthcare resources may be limited. General recommendations include those to minimise patient exposure to COVID-19, including the use of telehealth, avoidance of non-essential visits and minimisation of time spent by patients in infusion suites and other clinical areas. This statement also provides recommendations where appropriate in assessing indications for therapy, reducing therapy-associated immunosuppression and reducing healthcare utilisation in patients with specific haematological malignancies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Specific decisions regarding therapy of haematological malignancies will need to be individualised, based on disease risk, risks of immunosuppression, rates of community transmission of COVID-19 and available local healthcare resources.
Assuntos
Consenso , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/fisiopatologia , Linfoma/fisiopatologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/fisiopatologia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Austrália , Betacoronavirus/imunologia , COVID-19 , Comorbidade , Infecções por Coronavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Tratamento Farmacológico , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/imunologia , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/terapia , Linfoma/imunologia , Linfoma/terapia , Mieloma Múltiplo/imunologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Nova Zelândia , Pneumonia Viral/imunologia , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medição de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Terapia de Salvação/métodos , Transplante de Células-Tronco/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIMS: We sought to determine factors associated with the overall survival from relapse (OSR) of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) after allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) and the effect of first salvage therapy and subsequent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) on OSR. METHODS: Data on 386 patients from nine Australian centres with relapsed AML post-alloHSCT were collected retrospectively. OSR was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using the log-rank test and proportional hazards modelling, respectively and a prognostic index for OSR was derived from multivariate modelling. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, relapse within 6 months (hazard ratio (HR) 2.4, P < 0.001) and grade 3-4 acute GVHD preceding relapse (HR 2.0, P = 0.004), were associated with inferior OSR. Patients with 1-2 factors had inferior OSR compared to those with zero factors (all patients: HR 2.3, P < 0.001, patients given salvage: HR 1.8, P < 0.001). The first salvage therapy used post-relapse was donor cell therapy (DCT) (second alloHSCT or donor lymphocyte infusion) in 75, re-induction chemotherapy (CT) in 103, radiotherapy in 8 and interferon-α in 6. Although re-induction CT death rate was low (2%), survival after CT was inferior to DCT (HR 1.9, P < 0.001). No survival benefit was seen for patients who developed GVHD following salvage therapy (P = 0.405). CONCLUSION: Patients with AML who relapse beyond 6 months from alloHSCT without prior grade 3-4 acute GVHD have a better outcome from salvage therapy. Salvage treatments employing DCT as the initial treatment of AML relapse confer a survival advantage over CT.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/mortalidade , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/tendências , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/mortalidade , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais/tendências , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Transplante Homólogo/mortalidade , Transplante Homólogo/tendências , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Polatuzumab vedotin (Pola) is an approved therapy in combination with rituximab and bendamustine for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (RR-DLBCL) based on positive results of the landmark phase II randomised G029365 trial. However, trial results for many approved novel therapies in RR-DLBCL have not been replicated in routine care cohorts, as RR-DLBCL patient populations are heterogeneous and trial eligibility is increasingly restrictive. We evaluated outcomes from pola ± bendamustine and rituximab in patients with RR-DLBCL enrolled in a compassionate access program with no alternative treatment options identified via the Australasian Lymphoma and Related Diseases Registry according to their eligibility for the original phase II published study. Of 58 eligible patients, 74% met the criteria deeming them ineligible for the G029365 original study at the time of pola's commencement. Median progression-free survival and overall survival in our cohort were 2.3 and 3.5 months, respectively. In contrast to the landmark trial cohort, more of our patients ceased therapy prior to completion, the majority due to progressive disease and only 8/58 received any subsequent treatment. Dismal outcomes in this Australian real-world population demonstrate trial eligibility is challenging to meet, and newer treatments can be difficult to deliver in routine care. Clinically applicable results from therapeutic studies require trial cohorts to reflect representative clinical populations wherever possible, and more research is required to address the benefit of novel agents in the increasing majority who are ineligible for modern studies.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais Murinos/administração & dosagem , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/metabolismo , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/mortalidade , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prednisona/administração & dosagem , Rituximab , Taxa de Sobrevida , Vincristina/administração & dosagemRESUMO
Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) have an established role in the management of patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). However, scant data exist on outcomes of patients ineligible for clinical trials testing these therapies. We describe a contemporary cohort of relapsed/refractory MCL patients from the Australasian Lymphoma and Related Diseases Registry treated with ibrutinib December 2014 until July 2018, to determine the proportion potentially eligible for original trials, reasons for ineligibility and survival outcomes. Of 44 patients, 41% met one or more exclusion criteria from previous phase II/III MCL BTKi studies. Median progression-free and overall survival were 13.7 months (95% CI 6.2-28.1) and 15.6 months (95% CI 10.8-29.6) respectively and were shorter in patients excluded from clinical trials based on ECOG ≥2. Ibrutinib has demonstrable clinical effectiveness in a population enriched for unfit and trial-ineligible patients, and a need for more inclusive enrollment criteria in future BTKi studies is highlighted.