Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 66
Filtrar
1.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(2): e13851, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33237611

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, the trans-peritoneal approach is preferred for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN). However, retroperitoneal RPN (RP-RPN) has recently become widespread because of the advantages of easier access to the hilum, ease dissection of posterior tumours, and lower probability of intra-peritoneal organ injury. We aimed to present our initial experience of the RP-RPN series in posteriorly located renal tumours. METHODS: Twenty-one patients were included in the study, who underwent RP-RPN by a single surgeon between July 2019 and January 2020. RP-RPN was carried out only in posteriorly located renal tumours with ischemic (on-clamp) or zero ischemic (off-clamp) techniques. Patients with solitary kidney and a history of previous retroperitoneal surgery in the lumbodorsal region were excluded from the study. RESULTS: All cases completed without any operative complication and conversion to open or radical nephrectomy. Seven cases were completed as zero ischemic and 14 cases as ischemic technique. The mean operation time was 157.86 ± 64.24 minutes and estimated blood loss was 173.81 ± 136.84 mL. The mean warm ischemia time was 15.81 ± 12.42 minutes. Positive surgical margin observed in 4.8% of the patients. The mean length of stay was 3.33 ± 0.79 days. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) change in the 3rd postoperative month was -3.71 ± 8.57 ml/min/1.73 m2 (4.6%). Mean follow-up period was 10.29 ± 4.86 months. New-onset stage 3-4 chronic kidney disease (eGFR < 60 m /min/1.73m2 ) was not observed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: RP-RPN is a safe and feasible approach with acceptable oncological and functional results. We think that RP-RPN can be applied as an alternative to the trans-peritoneal approach for selected cases, especially in renal tumours with the posterior location.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais , Laparoscopia , Robótica , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Nefrectomia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(2): e13757, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33058376

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To compare long-term oncological and renal functional outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy for small renal masses. METHODS: A total of 103 patients who underwent laparoscopic (n = 31) and robotic (n = 72) partial nephrectomy between April 2015 and November 2018 were included in the study. Perioperative parameters, long-term oncological and functional outcomes were compared between the laparoscopic and robotic groups. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in terms of age, tumour size, RENAL and PADUA scores, pre-operative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and presence of chronic hypertension and diabetes (P = .479, P = .199, P = .120 and P = .073, P = .561, and P = .082 and P = .518, respectively). Only estimated blood loss was significantly higher in the laparoscopic group in operative parameters (158.23 ± 72.24 mL vs. 121.11 ± 72.17 mL; P = .019), but transfusion rates were similar between the groups (P = .33). In the laparoscopic group, two patients (6.5%) required conversion to open, while no conversion was needed in the robotic group (P = .89). There were no differences in terms of positive surgical margin and complication rates (P = .636 and P = .829, respectively). No significant differences were observed in eGFR changes and post-operative new-onset chronic kidney disease at 1 year after the surgery (P = .768, P = .614, respectively). The overall mean follow-up period was 36.07 ± 13.56 months (P = .007). During the follow-up period, no cancer-related death observed in both group and non-cancer-specific survival was 93.5% and 94.4% in laparoscopic and robotic groups, respectively (P = .859). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, perioperative and long-term oncological and functional outcomes seems to be comparable between laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomies.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais , Laparoscopia , Robótica , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Nefrectomia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Turk J Med Sci ; 51(3): 1136-1145, 2021 06 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33387989

RESUMO

Background/aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of low- and high-pressure pneumoperitoneum pressures applied during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) on regional cerebral oxygenation saturation (rSO2). Materials and methods: The prospective, comparative, and observational study included patients aged 18­80 years, with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II, who would undergo elective RALP. The patients were divided into two groups (12 mmHg of pneumoperitoneum pressure group, n=22 and 15 mmHg of pneumoperitoneum pressure group, n=23). Patients' demographic data, durations of anesthesia, surgery, pneumoperitoneum, and Trendelenburg position, intraoperative estimated blood loss, fluid therapy, urine output, hemodynamic and respiratory data, and rSO2 values were recorded at regular intervals. Results: The rSO2 values increased significantly during the pneumoperitoneum combined with steep Trendelenburg position (from t3 to t6) and at the end of the surgery (t7) in both groups, compared to the values 5 min after the onset of pneumoperitoneum in the supine position (t2) (P < 0.05), but no statistical significance was observed between the two groups. No cerebral desaturation was observed in any of our patients. Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were preserved in both groups. The blood lactate levels were significantly higher in patients operated at high-pressure pneumoperitoneum, compared to those with low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (P < 0.05). Conclusion: We believe that low-pressure pneumoperitoneum, especially in robotic surgeries, such as robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP), can be applied safely.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Pneumoperitônio , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Masculino , Pneumoperitônio Artificial/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos
5.
Arch Ital Urol Androl ; 89(3): 186-191, 2017 Oct 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28969403

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of bladder neck reconstruction techniques on early continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This non-randomized retrospective study analyzed prospectively collected data concerning LRP. In total, 3107 patients underwent LRP between March 1999 and December 2016. Exclusion criteria were preoperative urinary incontinence, previous history of external beam radiotherapy, co-morbities which may affect urinary continence such as diabetes mellitus and/or neurogenic disorders, irregular followup, and follow-up shorter than 24 months. All patients were divided into one of three groups, posterior reconstruction being performed in Group 1 (n = 112), anterior reconstruction in Group 2 (n = 762), and bladder neck sparing (BNS) in Group 3 (n = 987). Demographic and pre-, peri-, and postoperative data were collected. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors affecting early continence after LRP. RESULTS: 1861 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean follow-up period was 48.12 ± 29.8 months, and subjects' mean age was 63.6 ± 6.2 years. There was no significant difference among the groups in terms of demographic or preoperative data. Postoperative data, including oncological outcomes, were similar among the groups. The level of early continence was higher in Group 3 than in the other groups (p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses identified BNS and age as parameters significantly affecting early continence levels after LRP (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Bladder neck reconstruction provided less earlier continence than BNS.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/métodos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Idoso , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Incontinência Urinária/epidemiologia
6.
Arch Ital Urol Androl ; 89(1): 71-74, 2017 Mar 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28403595

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: After radical prostatectomy, surgical margin positivity is an important indicator of biochemical recurrence and progression. In our study we want to compare the surgical margin positivity rates for retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) and investigate the factors affecting surgical margin positivity in RALP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 78 RRP and 62 RALP patients operated from 2011 May to 2016 March were retrospectively screened. Patients in both groups were compared in terms of age, postop hematocrit reduction, hospital stay, duration of follow-up, surgical margin positivity, biochemical recurrence and oncologic parameters. In RALP group it was searched the relationship between the surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen (PSA), positive biopsy core, biopsy Gleason scoring, pathologic stage and Gleason scoring, lymph node positivity, lymphovascular and perineural invasion, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, prostate weight. RESULTS: Patients in the RALP group had lower postop hematocrit reduction and shorter hospital stay (p < 0.001). There was no difference in surgical margin positivity between RALP and RRP groups (37.1% vs. 29.5%, p = 0.341). In RALP group there was a correlation between surgical margin positivity and positive biopsy core number (p = 0.011), pathologic stage (p < 0.001) and Gleason score (p < 0.001), EAU risk classification (p = 0.001), seminal vesicle invasion (p = 0.045), extraprostatic extension (p < 0.001). There was no correlation between prostate weight (p = 0.896), PSA (p = 0.220), biopsy Gleason score (p = 0.266), lymph node positivity (p = 0.140), perineural (p = 0.103) and lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.92) with surgical margin positivity. CONCLUSIONS: Positive biopsy core number, pathological stage and Gleason score, EAU risk classification, seminal vesicle invasion and extraprostatic extension are correlated with surgical margin positivity in RALP.


Assuntos
Margens de Excisão , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Idoso , Biópsia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
7.
Med Sci Monit ; 22: 4363-4368, 2016 Nov 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27842051

RESUMO

BACKGROUND It is unclear whether parenchymal thickness (PT), in combination with stone density measured by Hounsfield Units (HU), affects stone-free rates after PCNL. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between PT in combination with stone density values and the outcomes of PCNL. MATERIAL AND METHODS From 2009 to 2014, data from 216 PCNL patients were prospectively analyzed. In total, 120 patients were included in the study. Using NCCT images, stone burden, stone localization, stone density as HU values, PT, and operative-postoperative parameters were recorded. RESULTS Stone localization, stone type, stone burden, and presence of hydronephrosis were statistically significant factors affecting stone-free status (p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.01, and p<0.01, respectively). The stone-free rate in patients with thicker renal parenchyma was higher than in patients with lower parenchymal thickness (p<0.01). No correlation was detected between stone density and success rate (p>0.05). Drop in Hb (%) was only correlated with parenchymal thickness (p<0.01). In univariate analyses, factors that affected blood transfusion requirement were PT, BMI, and operative times (p<0.01, p<0.05, and p<0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Stone location, stone burden, and presence of hydronephrosis detected with NCCT were factors affecting PCNL outcome. Stone density values did not correlate with the rate of bleeding or success of PCNL. PT measured by NCCT may predict bleeding and may guide surgeons in determining preoperative blood requirements. The outcome of PCNL appeared to be better in patients with thicker renal parenchyma and should be taken into consideration in the clinical evaluation of patients undergoing PCNL.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais/terapia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Adulto , Transfusão de Sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Hidronefrose/terapia , Cálculos Renais/metabolismo , Litotripsia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tecido Parenquimatoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26174074

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of thiocolchicoside during endoscopic treatment of ureteral calculus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between May 2014 and December 2014, 498 consecutive patients were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were operations under general anaesthesia, chancing laser lithotripter settings, and urinary tract infection. All patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 consisted of patients who were not administered thiocolchicoside, group 2 consisted of patients who were administered 5 mg thiocolchicoside, and group 3 consisted of patients who were administered 10 mg thiocolchicoside. Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative data were recorded. Complications were noted according to Clavien-Dindo classifications. A p value of p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 427 patients (319 male and 108 female) with full data were investigated. Mean age was 43.3 ± 13.3 years. There were 157 patients in group 1, 141 patients in group 2, and 129 patients in group 3. Stone migration and operation time were significantly lower in groups 2 and 3 than in group 1 (respectively; p < 0.001, p = 0.03). However, usage of jj stents was significantly lower in group 3 than in the other groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Stone migration can be decreased by using locally administered thiocolchicoside in irrigation solution during endoscopic treatment of ureteral calculus. Additional doses may decrease usage of jj stents and operation time.


Assuntos
Colchicina/análogos & derivados , Litotripsia a Laser/métodos , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapêutico , Cálculos Ureterais/terapia , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Colchicina/administração & dosagem , Colchicina/uso terapêutico , Comorbidade , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Tempo de Internação , Litotripsia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fármacos Neuromusculares/administração & dosagem , Duração da Cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Stents/estatística & dados numéricos
9.
BJU Int ; 116(1): 102-8, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24571244

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the oncological safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) for patients with clinical T3 (cT3) prostate cancer compared with patients with cT1 and cT2 prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 2375 consecutive LRPs were evaluated between 1999 and 2013. Of the 1751 patients enrolled with complete follow-up data (>24 months), patients were divided into three groups according to clinical stage of prostate cancer using Tumour-Node-Metastasis (TNM) classification. Group 1 consisted of patients with cT1 stage prostate cancer, group 2 those with cT2, and group 3 those with cT3. Demographic, postoperative, and long-term data of patients were recorded and statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age was 63.6 (6.2) years. The mean (SD) follow-up was 104 (28.4) months. There were 417 patients in group 1, 842 patients in group 2, and 492 patients in group 3. The mean prostate-specific antigen level, biopsy Gleason score, tumour volume, body mass index, and age, were all higher in group 3 (P < 0.001). Nerve-sparing techniques were used more in group 1 than in the other groups (P < 0.001). Extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, Gleason score, positive surgical margin (PSM), and rate of adjuvant hormone and radiotherapies were highest in group 3. However, urinary continence was similar in all groups. Group 1 contained the most patients with an erection sufficient for intercourse. Group 1 had the best cancer-specific survival rate, whereas overall survival (OS) rates and complications were similar in all groups. CONCLUSION: LRP seems effective and safe for patients with cT3 prostate cancer with similar OS rates as for those with cT1 and cT2; however, additional therapies may have contributed to these rates. LRP can be considered for the treatment of patients with cT3 prostate cancer.


Assuntos
Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Seguimentos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Int J Urol ; 22(10): 916-21, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26212891

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare operative, pathological, and functional results of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy carried out by a single surgeon. METHODS: After having experience with 32 transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomies, 317 extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomies, 30 transperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies and 10 extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies, 120 patients with prostate cancer were enrolled in this prospective randomized study and underwent either transperitoneal or extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The main outcome parameters between the two study groups were compared. RESULTS: No significant difference was found for age, body mass index, preoperative prostate-specific antigen, clinical and pathological stage, Gleason score on biopsy and prostatectomy specimen, tumor volume, positive surgical margin, and lymph node status. Transperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy had shorter trocar insertion time (16.0 vs 25.9 min for transperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, P < 0.001), whereas extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy had shorter console time (101.5 vs 118.3 min, respectively, P < 0.001). Total operation time and total anesthesia time were found to be shorter in extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, without statistical significance (200.9 vs 193.2 min; 221.8 vs 213.3 min, respectively). Estimated blood loss was found to be lower for extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (P = 0.001). Catheterization and hospitalization times were observed to be shorter in extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (7.3 vs 5.8 days and 3.1 vs 2.3 days for transperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, respectively, P < 0.05). The time to oral diet was significantly shorter in extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (32.3 vs 20.1 h, P = 0.031). Functional outcomes (continence and erection) and complication rates were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy seems to be a good alternative to transperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with similar operative, pathological and functional results. As the surgical field remains away from the bowel, postoperative return to normal diet and early discharge can be favored.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/métodos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Idoso , Anestesia , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Ingestão de Alimentos , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Peritônio/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Cateterismo Urinário , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia
11.
Scott Med J ; 60(1): e8-10, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25468366

RESUMO

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour (IMT) is a rare benign mesenchymal tumour. However, IMT may arise from a wide variety of tissues and is very rare in the elderly. IMT may mimic the mass in which it originates. Although IMT has been defined as uncertain behaviour, it is treated surgically. We present a-65-year old man whose mass was diagnosed as IMT extending from scrotum to pelvis. The mass was independent of any surrounding anatomic structures. According to our best knowledge this is the first case in the literature that pelvic IMT was diagnosed in an elderly man and successfully treated surgically with a long term follow-up period. Aetiology of IMT is still unknown, and more studies are needed for exact continuum of IMT.


Assuntos
Granuloma de Células Plasmáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de Tecido Muscular/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pélvicas/diagnóstico , Pelve/patologia , Escroto/patologia , Doenças Testiculares/diagnóstico , Idoso , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Granuloma de Células Plasmáticas/patologia , Humanos , Inflamação/diagnóstico , Masculino , Neoplasias de Tecido Muscular/patologia , Neoplasias de Tecido Muscular/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pélvicas/patologia , Neoplasias Pélvicas/cirurgia , Doenças Raras , Doenças Testiculares/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
Urol Int ; 90(3): 348-53, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23406677

RESUMO

AIM: To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic (LRCP) and open radical cystoprostatectomy (ORCP) with orthotopic urinary diversion for muscle-invasive organ-confined bladder cancer by a single surgeon. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospectively documented 15 LRCP and 15 ORCP patients, followed for at least 3 years, were included in our study. The demographic parameters of patients, preoperative radiologic staging, previous operations, surgical outcomes, complications, oncologic results and intermediate-term follow-up, postoperative chemotherapy and follow-up periods were recorded and evaluated. RESULTS: The mean oncologic follow-up was 3 years. Transfusion rate, estimated blood loss, oral intake and narcotic analgesic requirement were statistically less in the LRCP group (p < 0.05). However, operation time and hospital stay were similar in both groups. The complication rates were not significantly different between the two groups. The mean number of dissected lymph nodes was 20.0 ± 1.7 in the ORCP and 22.6 ± 2.0 in the LRCP group. One patient in each group had a margin positive for bladder cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic approach may be feasible for muscle-invasive organ-confined bladder cancer. Furthermore, LRCP provides less blood loss, early oral intake and postoperative pain management. Additionally, continence and sexual function may be provided by LRCP as with ORCP.


Assuntos
Cistectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Estruturas Criadas Cirurgicamente , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Idoso , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Cistectomia/efeitos adversos , Seguimentos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Estruturas Criadas Cirurgicamente/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Turquia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia
13.
Urol Int ; 91(3): 304-9, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24051760

RESUMO

AIM: To evaluate outcomes of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for adrenal masses in the light of changing laparoscopic surgical techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients were analyzed retrospectively. There were 2 groups; group 1 included patients who had conventional transperitoneal LA and transperitoneal LESS, and group 2 included patients who had lateral retroperitoneal LA, retroperitoneal LA in prone position, and retroperitoneal LESS. Demographic data, urine 3-methoxy-4-hydroxymandelic acid, normetanephrine, epinephrine, serum cortisol, aldosterone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, side and size of mass, conversion to open surgery, complications, estimated blood loss, operation time, pathological results were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: There was no difference in demographic data and serum parameters between both groups. Tumor size, estimated blood loss, operation time, transfusion rate and hospital stay were less for group 2 (p < 0.05, p = 0.0001). However, the complication rate was similar in both groups; in retroperitoneal prone position, the complication rate was less than for other surgical approaches, but statistically significant results could not be assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Even if the diameter of adrenal mass is larger than 6 cm, LA may be considered as the gold standard. The retroperitoneal approach especially in prone position may be a promising treatment method in the near future for adrenalectomy in selected patients.


Assuntos
Adrenalectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Doenças das Glândulas Suprarrenais/cirurgia , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peritônio/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
14.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 33(11): 1097-1101, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37646643

RESUMO

Aim: To assess the oncological and functional outcomes of patients aged 70 years or older after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and compare their results with younger men. Materials and Methods: Our study included 496 men who underwent RARP in our clinic between March 2015 and December 2021 with at least 1-year follow-up. Of these patients, 130 were aged 70 or older, and 366 were between 60 and 69. Preoperative characteristics, perioperative parameters, postoperative oncological, and functional results were studied. Results: The entire cohort (496 patients) aged 67 years on median (range 60-84), with a median prostate-specific antigen of 8.4 ng/mL. All the patients had a minimum 1-year of follow-up and the median follow-up was 32 months. According to the perioperative parameters, the two groups were similar except for hospital length of stay. On final pathology, the pathological stage, positive surgical margin rate and lymph node positivity were statistically not different between the two groups. The International Society of Urological Pathology grades were higher on final pathology for both groups, but this increase was greater in the ≥70 age group, and this was statistically significant (P = .013). In both groups, the median International Index for Erectile Function scores decreased after surgery significantly (P < .001), and at the 1st year follow-up, the decrease between the two groups was not different (0.973). Concerning continence outcomes, pad-free continence was significantly better in the 60-69 age group (94.5%) compared to the ≥70 age group (93.1%). Conclusions: The perioperative safety, oncological, and functional results of RARP in elderly men are comparable to younger patients. Clinical trial registiration number: (30/06/2022-13/24).


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 33(2): 150-154, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36257651

RESUMO

Background: The aim of the study is to compare the results of early urinary continence (UC), pathological results, console time (CT), and perioperative morbidity in patients who underwent transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (TR-RARP) and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) surgeries in the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Methods: A total of 120 patients, 60 (Group 1) with the TR-RALP technique and 60 (Group 2) with the RS-RALP technique, who had no statistical difference in their preoperative demographic data, were selected retrospectively. Perioperative and postoperative data, and continence rates in the first, third and sixth months were compared between the 2 groups. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of CT, hemoglobin change, and perioperative and postoperative data. There was a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in favor of RS-RARP in terms of UC in the first and third months, whereas there was no statistically significant difference between the groups at month 6 (P = .001, P = .002, and P = .245, respectively). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the RS-RARP technique is a promising approach to achieve early continence without compromising oncological principles and without increased complication rates.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Incontinência Urinária , Masculino , Humanos , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia , Incontinência Urinária/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia
16.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 69(12): e20230825, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38055454

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the minimum number of required cases for successful robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy for an experienced surgeon in transperitoneal robotic surgery. METHODS: Our prospectively collected clinic database was evaluated retrospectively, and 50 patients who underwent robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy by a single experienced surgeon from January 2019 to February 2023 were included in this study. Demographic and perioperative data and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores were noted. margin, ischemia, and complication score was used to predict surgical success. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine how many cases were required to achieve margin, ischemia, and complication score positivity and to apply the off-clamp technique. Also, the first 25 patients were assigned to Group 1 and the second 25 patients to Group 2, and the data were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The patients' demographic data and tumor characteristics were similar in the groups. The off-clamp technique and sutureless technique rates in Group 2 were significantly higher than that in Group 1. Margin, ischemia, and complication score positivity was observed in 60% (n=15) of Group 1 and 96% (n=24) of Group 2. At receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the 25th and later cases were statistically significant in terms of margin, ischemia, and complication score positivity. In terms of performing surgery with the off-clamp technique, the 28th and subsequent cases were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: A total of 25 or more cases appear to be sufficient to provide optimal surgical results in robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy for an experienced surgeon.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Isquemia/cirurgia
17.
J Robot Surg ; 16(6): 1483-1489, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35394250

RESUMO

Bone pelvic dimensions and body habitus may have effects on robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). In this study, we examined the effects of body mass index, bone pelvis measurements and prostate measurements on console time (CT), decrease in postoperative hemogram level (DHL) and surgical margin(SM) in patients who underwent RARP for clinically localized prostate cancer in our institution. The data of transperitoneal RARP cases performed by a single surgeon between November 2016 and August 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. It was included in 125 patients who met the study criteria. Bone and soft tissue measurements were made on magnetic resonance imaging T2-weighted imaging in the mid-sagittal and transvers plane. In multivariate linear regression analyzes, only soft tissue width/transverse diameter of the prostate and CT were found to be correlated (p = 0.026). For the DHL, no pelvic dimension and body habitus had a significant association on multivariate linear regression analysis. In multivariate analyzes, a statistically significant difference was found only between pathological Gleason Score and SM (p = 0.008). Although we found statistically significant associations between prostate diameters and pelvic bone measurements and operative difficulties, we believe that further studies are needed to confirm these results. Such information can help identify patients with challenging anatomy and can be used in robotic surgery training to achieve optimal patient outcomes after RARP.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Próstata/cirurgia , Próstata/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética
18.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 32(3): 265-269, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33661035

RESUMO

Background: The aim of the study is to examine the effect of peritoneal re-approximation or non-approximation on the postoperative course of patients at the end of transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (tRARP). It is also aimed to examine the relationship between peritoneal re-approximation or non-approximation and drain removal time, need for analgesics, passage of flatus, and length of hospital stay. Methods: A total of 247 patients who underwent tRARP by 2 different experienced surgeons were included in the study. At the end of the tRARP procedure, 1 surgeon performed peritoneal re-approximation (Group 1, n = 108), whereas the other performed peritoneal non-approximation (Group 2, n = 139). The effect of the procedures on drain removal time, passage of flatus, need for analgesics, and length of hospital stay were compared between the groups. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of preoperative parameters including age, body mass index, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen levels (P > .05) (P = .622, P = .126 and P = .591, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of comorbidity, Gleason score, clinical stage, and lymph node dissection (P = .086, P = .344, P = .318, P = .587, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of drain removal time, need for analgesics, passage of flatus, and length of hospital stay (P = .095, P = .142, P = 95, P = .389, respectively). Conclusion: This study did not demonstrate any additional postoperative benefit of peritoneal re-approximation. It has been shown that peritoneal re-approximation has no effect on the length of hospital stay, the need for pain relievers, and passage of flatus, drain duration, day. Therefore, we do not recommend re-approximation of the peritoneum.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Humanos , Masculino , Peritônio/cirurgia , Próstata/patologia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos
19.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 32(4): 355-359, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33960836

RESUMO

Background: We aim to directly compare the feasibility and safety of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during transperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (Tp-RARP) and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (Ep-LRP). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively identified the prospectively maintained database records of 162 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PC) who underwent Ep-LRP or Tp-RARP with extended PLND. Patients with risk of nodal metastases over 5% according to Briganti nomogram received extended PLND. All data analyzed in this study were based on the documentation in our PC database including age, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index score, preoperative prostate-specific antigen, history of abdominal surgery, biopsy Gleason score, total operation time, postoperative pelvic drainage time, pathological results, lymph node yield (LNY), percentage lymph node involvement (%LNI), and perioperative complications. Patients were followed up for biochemical recurrence in the postoperative period. Results: Eighty-two of the 162 enrolled patients were in group 1 (Ep-LRP+PLND) and 80 were in group 2 (Tp-RARP+PLND). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding preoperative demographics and clinical characteristics. The median LNY was 17 (range 8-27) and 17.5 (range 10-29) in groups 1 and 2, respectively, and no statistically significant difference was found. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of biochemical recurrence-free survival with mean follow-up of 44.8 months after radical surgery. Conclusion: Our results support the view that extended PLND through the Ep-LRP approach is a feasible and safe procedure without compromising oncological efficacy compared with a similar template attempted during Tp-RARP. Clinical Trial Registration number is 01/21-2.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Neoplasias da Próstata , Robótica , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Masculino , Pelve/patologia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos
20.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 72(1): 21-28, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33819496

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy are at increased risk of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) because of intraoperative bleeding, obstructive uropathy, and older age. Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) may become important for diagnosis of postoperative AKI after urogenital oncosurgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of NGAL as a predictor of AKI diagnosis in patients who underwent Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy (RRP) and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy (RALP) for prostate cancer. METHODS: We included 66 patients who underwent RRP (n = 32) or RALP (n = 34) in this prospective, comparative, nonrandomized study. Patients' demographic data, duration of surgery and anesthesia, amount of blood products, vasopressor therapy, intraoperative blood loss, fluid administration, length of hospital stay, creatinine, and plasma NGAL levels were recorded. RESULTS: Intraoperative blood loss, crystalloid fluid administration, and length of hospital stay were significantly shorter in RALP. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of intraoperative blood transfusion. Postoperative creatinine and plasma NGAL levels were increased in both groups. The 6-h NGAL levels were higher in RRP (p = 0.026). The incidence of AKI was 28.12% in RRP and 26.05% in RALP, respectively. The NGAL level at 6 hours was more sensitive in the early diagnosis of AKI in RALP. CONCLUSION: Although postoperative serum NGAL levels were increased in both RRP and RALP, the 6-h NGAL levels were higher in RRP. RALP was associated with fewer intraoperative blood loss and fluid administration, and shorter length of hospital stay.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Laparoscopia , Robótica , Injúria Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Creatinina , Feminino , Humanos , Lipocalina-2 , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA