Heart transplantation in the era of corona virus disease 2019: Impact of the pandemic on donors, recipients and outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Since March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has tremendously impacted health care all around the globe. We analyzed the impact of the pandemic on donors, recipients, and outcome of heart transplantation (HTx). METHODS: Between 2010 and early 2022, a total of n = 235 patients underwent HTx in our department. Patients were assigned to the study groups regarding the date of the performed HTx. Group 1 (09/2010 to 02/2020): n = 160, Group 2 (03/2020 to 02/2022): n = 75. RESULTS: Since the pandemic, the etiology of heart failure in the recipients has shifted from dilated (Group 1: 53.8%, Group 2: 32.0%) to ischemic cardiomyopathy (Group 1: 39.4%, Group 2: 50.7%, p < .01). The percentage of high urgency status of the recipients dropped from 50.0% to 36.0% (p = .05), and the use of left ventricular assist (LVAD) support from 56.9% to just 37.3% (p < .01). Meanwhile, the waiting time for the recipients also decreased by about 40% (p = .05). Since the pandemic, donors were 2- times more likely to have been previously resuscitated (Group 1: 21.3%, Group 2: 45.3% (p < .01), and drug abuse increased by more than 3-times (p < .01), indicating acceptance of more marginal donors. Surprisingly, the incidence of postoperative severe primary graft dysfunction requiring extracorporeal life support decreased from 33.1% to 19.4% (p = .04) since the pandemic. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic affected both donors and recipients of HTX but not the postoperative outcome. Donors nowadays are more likely to suffer from ischemic heart disease and are less likely to be on the high-urgency waitlist and on LVAD support. Simultaneously, an increasing number of marginal donors are accepted, leading to shorter waiting times.

Impact of circadian rhythm and daytime variation on outcome after heart transplantation.

INTRO: Recently, the impact of circadian rhythm and daytime variation on surgical outcomes has attracted interest. Although studies for coronary artery and aortic valve surgery report contrary results, effects on heart transplantation have not been studied. METHODS: Between 2010 and February 2022, 235 patients underwent HTx in our department. The recipients were reviewed and categorized according to the start of the HTx procedure - between 04:00 am and 11:59 am (morning, n = 79), 12:00 pm and 07:59 pm (afternoon, n = 68) or 08:00 pm and 03:59 am (night, n = 88). RESULTS: The incidence of high urgency status was slightly but not significantly increased (p = .08) in the morning (55.7%), compared to the afternoon (41.2%) or night (39.8%). The most important donor and recipient characteristics were comparable among the three groups. The incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) requiring extracorporeal life support (morning: 36.7%, afternoon: 27.3%, night: 23.0%, p = .15) was also similarly distributed. In addition, there were no significant differences for kidney failure, infections, and acute graft rejection. However, the incidence of bleeding that required rethoracotomy showed an increased trend in the afternoon (morning: 29.1%, afternoon: 40.9%, night: 23.0%, p = .06). 30-day survival (morning: 88.6%, afternoon: 90.8%, night: 92.0%, p = .82) and 1-year survival (morning: 77.5%, afternoon: 76.0%, night: 84.4%, p = .41) were comparable between all groups. CONCLUSION: Circadian rhythm and daytime variation did not affect the outcome after HTx. Postoperative adverse events as well as survival were comparable throughout day- and night-time. As the timing of the HTx procedure is rarely possible and depends on the timing of organ recovery, these results are encouraging, as they allow for the continuation of the prevalent practice.

Clinical outcomes of hundred large Impella implantations in cardiogenic shock patients based on individual clinical scenarios.

BACKGROUND: Large Impella systems (5.0 or 5.5; i.e., Impella 5+) (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) help achieve better clinical outcomes through relevant left ventricular unloading in acute cardiogenic shock (CS). Here, we report our experience with Impella 5+, while focusing on the clinical outcomes depending on individual case scenarios in patients with acute CS. METHODS: This single-center retrospective observational study included 100 Impella 5+ implantations conducted on patients with acute CS from November 2018 to October 2021. After excluding 10 reimplantation cases, 90 cases were enrolled for further analysis. RESULTS: In-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 56.7% (n = 51) and 48.9% (n = 44), respectively. In-hospital mortality was lower in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) than in non-AMI patients (p = 0.07). Young age and low lactate levels were the independent predictors of successful transition and survival after permanent mechanical circulatory support/heart transplantation (pMCS/HTX) (age, p = 0.03; lactate level, p = 0.04; survived after pMCS/HTX, n = 11; died on Impella, n = 41). During simultaneous utilization of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy and Impella 5+, termed ECMELLA therapy, high dose of noradrenaline was a predictive factor for in-hospital mortality by multivariate analysis (n = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that enhanced Impella support might have better clinical outcomes among acute CS patients supported with large Impella, those with AMI than those with no AMI. Young age and low lactate levels were predictors of successful bridging to pMCS/HTX and favorable clinical outcomes thereafter. The clinical outcomes of ECMELLA therapy might depend on noradrenaline dose at the time of Impella 5+ implantation.

Changes in Therapy and Outcome of Patients Requiring Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) is related with poor outcome, especially in Germany. We aimed to analyze whether changes in vv-ECMO therapy during the pandemic were observed and lead to changes in the outcome of vv-ECMO patients. METHODS: All patients undergoing vv-ECMO support for COVID-19 between 2020 and 2021 in a single center (n = 75) were retrospectively analyzed. Weaning from vv-ECMO and in-hospital mortality were defined as primary and peri-interventional adverse events as secondary endpoints of the study. RESULTS: During the study period, four infective waves were observed in Germany. Patients were assigned correspondingly to four study groups: ECMO implantation between March 2020 and September 2020: first wave (n = 11); October 2020 to February 2021: second wave (n = 23); March 2021 to July 2021: third wave (n = 25); and August 2021 to December 2021: fourth wave (n = 20). Preferred cannulation technique changed within the second wave from femoro-femoral to femoro-jugular access (p < 0.01) and awake ECMO was implemented. Mean ECMO run time increased by more than 300% from 10.9 ± 9.6 (first wave) to 44.9 ± 47.0 days (fourth wave). Weaning of patients was achieved in less than 20% in the first wave but increased to approximately 40% since the second one. Furthermore, we observed a continuous numerically decrease of in-hospital mortality from 81.8 to 57.9% (p = 0.61). CONCLUSION: Preference for femoro-jugular cannulation and awake ECMO combined with preexisting expertise and patient selection are considered to be associated with increased duration of ECMO support and numerically improved ECMO weaning and in-hospital mortality.

Donor hypernatremia is associated with increased mortality after heart transplantation: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Donor hypernatremia has been associated with primary graft dysfunction in heart transplantation (HTx) and is correlated with impaired outcome following liver and renal transplantation. However, controversial data exist regarding the impact of sodium dysregulation on survival. This study aims to investigate the impact of donor sodium levels on early morbidity and short- and midterm survival following HTx. METHODS: Between September 2010 and June 2021, a total of n = 218 patients underwent HTx in our center. From those, 214 could be included retrospectively in our study. For each donor, sodium levels were collected and different cut-off levels from 145 to 159 mmol/L were investigated by Kaplan-Meier-analysis. Then, recipients were divided in three groups regarding donor sodium: Normonatremia (133-145 mmol/L, n = 73), mild hypernatremia (146-156 mmol/L, n = 105) and severe hypernatremia (>156 mmol/L, n = 35). Recipient and donor variables were reviewed and compared, including peri- and postoperative characteristics and recipient survival after up to 5 years after transplantation. RESULTS: All patients were comparable regarding baseline characteristics and perioperative parameters. Regarding early mortality, 90-day survival was significantly reduced only in patients with severe donor hypernatremia in comparison to normonatremia (90% vs. 71%, p = .02), but not in mild hypernatremia (89%, p = .89). One-year survival was comparable in all groups (p > .28). CONCLUSION: Severe donor hypernatremia was associated with reduced short-term survival, while the correlation weakens > 1 year after HTx. As our study is limited due to the nature of its retrospective, single-center approach, future prospective studies are needed to evaluate the importance of donor management with regard to hypernatremia.

Removal of Electrophysiological Devices in the Context of Heart Transplantation: Comparison of Combined and Staged Extraction Procedures.

BACKGROUND: During heart transplantation (HTx), tip of the leads of cardiac implantable electrophysiological devices (CIEPD) has to be cut when resecting the heart. Timing of the removal of the remaining device and leads is still discussed controversially. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2021, n = 201 patients underwent HTx, of those n = 124 (61.7%) carried a present CIEPD. These patients were divided on the basis of the time of complete device removal (combined procedure with HTx, n = 40 or staged procedure, n = 84). RESULTS: CIEPD was removed 11.4 ± 6.7 days after the initial HTx in staged patients. Dwelling time, number of leads as well as incidence of retained components (combined: 8.1%, staged: 7.7%, p = 1.00) were comparable between both groups. While postoperative incidence of infections (p = 0.52), neurological events (p = 0.47), and acute kidney injury (p = 0.44) did not differ, staged patients suffered more often from primary graft dysfunction with temporary mechanical assistance (combined: 20.0%, staged: 40.5%, p = 0.03). Consecutively, stay on intensive care unit (p = 0.02) was prolonged and transfusions of red blood cells (p = 0.15) and plasma (p = 0.06) as well as re-thoracotomy for thoracic bleeding complications (p = 0.10) were numerically increased in this group. However, we did not observe any differences in postoperative survival. CONCLUSION: Presence of CIEPD is common in HTx patients. However, the extraction strategy of CIEPD most likely did not affect postoperative morbidity and mortality except primary graft dysfunction. Especially, retained components, blood transfusions, and infective complications are not correlated to the timing of CIEPD removal.

Coronary artery bypass grafting under sole Impella 5.0 support for patients with severely depressed left ventricular function.

Selection of the ideal surgical procedure for coronary revascularization in patients with severe cardiac dysfunction at times may represent a challenge. In recent years, with the advent of surgical large microaxial pumps, e.g., Impella 5.0 (Abiomed Inc., Boston, USA), specific support and effective unloading of the left ventricle has become available. In the interventional field, good results have been achieved with smaller microaxial pumps in the setting of so-called protected percutaneous coronary intervention. In this study, we would like to share our early experience with surgical coronary revascularization under the sole support of Impella 5.0, omitting the use of heart-lung machine in three cases of severe cardiac dysfunction due to complex ischemic heart disease. Effective circulatory support intraoperatively and postoperatively speaks in favor of this technique in selected patients.

Effect of preoperative erector spinae muscles mass on postoperative outcomes in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

BACKGROUND: Frailty influences the postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Recently, erector spinae muscle (ESM) mass has been proposed as a parameter to assess frailty accurately. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether preoperative ESM mass is associated with short- and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with LVAD. METHODS: A total of 119 consecutive patients with LVAD were enrolled between January 2010 and October 2017 at a single heart center. The ESM area, ESM index, and Hounsfield units (HU) of the ESM were calculated by computed tomography for preoperative ESM mass evaluation. We then statistically evaluated the in-hospital mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), duration of hospital stay, and long-term survival. RESULTS: In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, ESM mass indicated no effect on all clinical outcomes. In addition, the ESM area presented a weak but significant negative linear correlation only with the duration of hospital stay (r = -0.21, p < .05). In contrast, the Model For End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and preoperative venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (va-ECMO) were significant predictive factors for in-hospital mortality (MELD score: p < .001, hazard ratio [HR] 1.1; preoperative va-ECMO: p < .01, HR 2.72) and MACE (MELD score: p < .001, HR 1.07; preoperative va-ECMO: p < .005, HR 2.62). CONCLUSION: Preoperative ESM mass might predict the length of hospital stay in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. In contrast, it had no effect on MACE, in-hospital mortality, or long-term survival in this study.

Impact of Reported Donor Ejection Fraction on Outcome after Heart Transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: The global shortage of donor organs has urged transplanting units to extend donor selection criteria, for example, impaired left ventricular function (LVF), leading to the use of marginal donor hearts. We retrospectively analyzed our patients after orthotopic heart transplantation (oHTX) with a focus on the clinical outcome depending on donor LVF. METHODS: Donor reports, intraoperative, echocardiographic, and clinical follow-up data of patients undergoing oHTX at a single-center between September 2010 and June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Recipients were divided into two groups based on donor left ventricular ejection fraction (dLVEF): impaired dLVEF (group I; dLVEF ≤ 50%; n = 23) and normal dLVEF group (group N; dLVEF > 50%; n = 137). RESULTS: There was no difference in 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year survival. However, the duration of in-hospital stay was statistically longer in group I than in group N (N: 40.9 ± 28.3 days vs. I: 55.9 ± 39.4 days, p < 0.05). Furthermore, postoperative infection events were significantly more frequent in group I (p = 0.03), which was also supported by multivariate analysis (p = 0.03; odds ratio: 2.96; confidence interval: 1.12-7.83). Upon correlation analysis, dLVEF and recipient LVEF prove as statistically independent (r = 0.12, p = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: Impaired dLVEF is associated with prolonged posttransplant recovery and slightly increased morbidity but has no significant impact on survival up to 1 year posttransplant.

Use of Organs for Heart Transplantation after Rescue Allocation: Comparison of Outcome with Regular Allocated High Urgent Recipients.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients waiting for heart transplantation (HTx) is exceeding the number of actual transplants. Subsequently, waiting times are increasing. One possible solution may be an increased acceptance of organs after rescue allocation. These organs had been rejected by at least three consecutive transplant centers due to medical reasons. METHODS: Between October 2010 and July 2019, a total of 139 patients underwent HTx in our department. Seventy (50.4%) of the 139 patients were transplanted with high urgency (HU) status and regular allocation (HU group); the remaining received organs without HU listing after rescue allocation (elective group, n = 69). RESULTS: Donor parameters were comparable between the groups. Thirty-day mortality was comparable between HU patients (11.4%) and rescue allocation (12.1%). Primary graft dysfunction with extracorporeal life support occurred in 26.9% of the elective group with rescue allocated organs, which was not inferior to the regular allocated organs (HU group: 35.7%). No significant differences were observed regarding the incidence of common perioperative complications as well as morbidity and mortality during 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the use of hearts after rescue allocation for elective transplantation of patients without HU status. We could show that patients with rescue allocated organs showed no significant disadvantages in the early perioperative morbidity and mortality as well at 1-year follow-up.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation after Heart Transplantation: Impact of Type of Cannulation.

BACKGROUND: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a common cause of early death after heart transplantation (htx). The use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) after htx has increased during the last years. It is still discussed controversially whether peripheral cannulation is favorable compared to central cannulation. We aimed to compare both cannulation techniques. METHODS: Ninety patients underwent htx in our department between 2010 and 2017. Twenty-five patients were treated with ECLS due to PGD (10 central extracorporeal membrane oxygenator [cECMO] and 15 peripheral extracorporeal membrane oxygenator [pECMO] cannulation). Pre- and intraoperative parameters were comparable between both groups. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was comparable between the ECLS-groups (cECMO: 30%; pECMO: 40%, p = 0.691). Survival at 1 year (n = 18) was 40 and 30.8% for cECMO and pECMO, respectively. The incidence of postoperative renal failure, stroke, limb ischemia, and infection was comparable between both groups. We also did not find significant differences in duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, or in-hospital stay. The incidence of bleeding complications was also similar (cECMO: 60%; pECMO: 67%). Potential differences in support duration in pECMO group (10.4 ± 9.3 vs. 5.7 ± 4.7 days, p = 0.110) did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: In patients supported for PGD, peripheral and central cannulation strategies are safe and feasible for prolonged venoarterial ECMO support. There was no increase in bleeding after central implantation. With regard to the potential complications of a pECMO, we think that aortic cannulation with tunneling of the cannula and closure of the chest could be a good option in patients with PGD after htx.

Successful Heart Transplantation after Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation of Donors.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation (HTx) is the best therapy for end-stage heart failure. Unfortunately, death on the waiting list remains a problem. Decreasing the number of rejected organs could increase the donor pool. METHODS: A total of 144 patients underwent HTx at our department between 2010 and 2019. Of them, 27 patients received organs of donors with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) prior to organ donation (donor CPR) and were compared with patients who received organs without CPR (control; n = 117). RESULTS: We did not observe any disadvantage in the outcome of the donor CPR group compared with the control group. Postoperative morbidity and 1-year survival (control: 72%; donor CPR: 82%; p = 0.35) did not show any differences. We found no impact of the CPR time as well as the duration between CPR and organ donation, but we found an improved survival rate for donors suffering from anoxic brain injury compared with cerebral injury (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Donor organs should not be rejected for HTx due to resuscitation prior to donation. The need for CPR does not affect the graft function after HTx in both short- and mid-term outcomes. We encourage the use of these organs to increase the donor pool and preserve good results.

Preoperative percutaneous carotid artery recanalization in a patient with aortic dissection type A.

Management of patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) presenting with cerebral malperfusion due to carotid artery obstruction is still a major challenge and often associated with poor prognosis despite successful surgical aortic repair, due to prolonged cerebral perfusion deficit. Here, we present the first report regarding successful percutaneous recanalization of an internal carotid artery occlusion in the setting of an ATAAD before open surgical aortic repair with excellent clinical outcome after three year follow-up, including almost full neurological recovery.

Iron deficiency does not impair the outcome after elective coronary artery bypass and aortic valve procedures.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Iron deficiency (ID), a common malnutrition, has been linked to impaired prognosis in patients with congestive heart failure. It remains unclear whether ID also affects the outcome after elective cardiac surgery. METHODS: A total of 378 consecutive patients undergoing either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) were prospectively enrolled, and blood samples were taken before surgery for analysis of iron metabolism. Incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was defined as the primary endpoint of the study. RESULTS: ID (ferritin < 100 ng/ml or ferritin = 100-299 ng/ml and transferrin saturation < 20%) was common in cardiac surgery patients (ID, n = 265, 70%) and related to significant decreased preoperative hemoglobin values (ID: 13.6 ± 1.6 g/dl, Non-ID: 14.3 ± 1.5 g/dl, p < 0.01). We did not observe any differences in the postoperative outcome of the two groups. The incidence of MACCE was 4.9% in patients with ID and 8.8% in Non-ID (p = 0.16). In-hospital mortality (ID: 1.9%, Non-ID: 4.4%, p = 0.17) and stroke (ID: 1.1%, Non-ID: 1.8%, p = 0.64) were also not altered by ID. In addition, intensive care unit and hospital stay, perioperative blood transfusions as well as perioperative morbidities, such as acute kidney injury, low cardiac output syndrome, major bleeding complication, and sternal wound infections were comparable in patients with and without ID. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients undergoing elective CABG or SAVR suffer from ID; however, we found no significant differences in regard to MACCE and postoperative morbidity between ID and non-ID patients.

Multimodal mechanical circulatory assist for perioperative biventricular failure.

A 61-year-old woman with acute myocardial infarction (MI), cardiogenic shock, and Impella CP support underwent emergency coronary artery bypass grafting. Postoperatively venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (va-ECMO) became necessary, followed by Impella 5.0 insertion on 7th postoperative day (POD), the addition of right ventricular support by TandemHeart due to inadequate flow of Impella system, which then allowed for va-ECMO weaning. Impella und TandemHeart were removed on 14th POD, 31st POD, respectively. Biventricular decompensation following MI was successfully treated by a sequence of different mechanical circulatory support systems allowing an adaptive weaning strategy.

The analysis of left ventricular ejection fraction after minimally invasive surgery for primary mitral valve regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Although minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) has become the first choice for primary mitral regurgitation (MR) in recent years, clinical evidence in this field is yet limited. The main focus of this study was the analysis of preoperative (Pre), postoperative (Post), and 1-year follow-up (Fu) data in our series of MIMVS to identify factors that have an impact on the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) evolution after MIMVS. METHODS: We reviewed the perioperative and 1-year follow-up data from 436 patients with primary MR (338 isolated MIMVS und 98 MIMVS combined with tricuspid valve repair) to analyze patients' baseline characteristics, the change of LV size, the postoperative evolution of LVEF and its factors, and the clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The overall mean value of ejection fraction (EF) slightly decreased at 1-year follow-up (mean change of LVEF: -2.63 ± 9.00%). A significant correlation was observed for preoperative EF (PreEF) und EF evolution, the higher PreEF the more pronounced decreased EF evolution (in all 436 patients; r = -.54, p < .001, in isolated MIMVS; r = -.54, p < .001, in combined MIMVS; r = -.53, p < .001). Statistically significant differences for negative EF evolution were evident in patients with mild or greater tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) (in all patients; p < .05, odds ratio [OR] = 1.64, in isolated MIMVS; p < .01, OR = 1.93, respectively). Overall clinical outcome in New York Heart Association classification at 1 year was remarkably improved. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest an excellent clinical outcome at 1 year, although mean LVEF slightly declined over time. TR could be a predictor of worsened follow-up LVEF in patients undergoing MIMVS.

The Impact of Intraoperative Patient Blood Management on Quality Development in Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Patient blood management (PBM) is increasingly introduced into clinical practice. Minimizing effects on transfusion have been proven, but relevance for clinical outcome has been sparsely examined. In regard to this, the authors analyzed the impact of introducing intraoperative PBM to cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: Single center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 3,170 patients who underwent either coronary artery bypass grafting, isolated aortic valve replacement, or a combined procedure at the authors' institution between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2015. INTERVENTION: In 2013, an intraoperative PBM service was established offering therapy recommendations on the basis of real-time laboratory monitoring. Comparisons to conventional coagulation management were adjusted for optimization of general, surgical, and perioperative care standards by interrupted time-series analysis and risk-dependent confounding by propensity- score matching. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary study endpoints were in-hospital mortality and morbidity. Morbidity was defined as clinically relevant prolongation of hospital stay, which was related to accumulation of postoperative complications. Transfusion requirements, bleeding, and thromboembolic complications were not treated as primary endpoints, but were also explored. The recommendations on the basis of real-time laboratory monitoring were adopted by the operative team in 72% of patients. Intraoperative PBM was associated independently with a reduction of morbidity (8.3% v 6.3%, p = 0.034), whereas in-hospitalmortality (3.0% v 2.6%, p = 0.521) remained unaffected. The need for red blood cell transfusion decreased (71.1% v 65.0%, p < 0.001), as did bleeding complications requiring surgical re-exploration (3.5% v 1.8%, p = 0.004). At the same time, stroke increased by statistical trend (1.0% v 1.9%, p = 0.038; after correction for imbalanced type of surgical procedure p = 0.085). CONCLUSIONS: Real-time laboratory recommendations achieved a high acceptance rate early after initiation. Improvement of clinical outcome by intraoperative PBM adds to the optimized surgical care. However, the corridor between hemostatic optimization and thromboembolic risk may be narrow.

Heart transplantation in patients with ventricular assist devices: Impacts of the implantation technique and support duration.

BACKGROUND: Orthotopic heart transplantation (HTx) is the gold standard treatment for patients with terminal heart failure. As donor organs are limited, patients are often on ventricular assist device (VAD) support before receiving HTx. We aimed to compare the outcome after HTx in patients with and without preoperative VADs as well as in patients who underwent different VAD implantation techniques. METHODS: A total of 126 patients underwent HTx at our department between 2010 and 2019 and were retrospectively analyzed. While 47 patients underwent primary transplantation (No VAD), 79 were on VAD support. The preoperative and intraoperative parameters were comparable between the two groups. RESULTS: VAD support significantly increased the HTx operation time (<0.0001), cardiopulmonary bypass time (P < .01), and warm ischemia time (P = .04). The ventilation time (P = .02), intensive care unit (ICU) stay (P = .01), and hospital stay (P = .02) were also significantly longer in VAD patients than in No VAD patients. Minimally invasive VAD implantation significantly reduced the requirement for perioperative blood transfusion (P = .01) and rethoracotomy (P = .01). Nonetheless, survival analyses did not show significant differences between the groups, but there was a trend of better results for the primary transplantation patients (30-day survival: No VAD = 91.1%, VAD = 86.1%; n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: We observed significantly worse perioperative parameters in patients who underwent transplantation after the implantation of a VAD compared to those who underwent primary transplantation. Minimally invasive VAD implantation without full sternotomy decreased complications during the subsequent HTx. In patients who are dependent on temporary VAD support as a bridge to transplantation, we believe that minimally invasive implantation should be performed if possible.

Evaluation of Strategies in the Management of Infective Aortic Valve Endocarditis at German Cardiac Surgical Departments.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of infective aortic valve endocarditis (AVE) remains a therapeutic challenge, necessitating interdisciplinary approach to limit morbidity and mortality in this high-risk cohort. With a considerable spectrum of available laboratory testings, imaging techniques, as well as operative strategies developed in recent years, there is a lack of standardization across cardiac surgical departments in Germany. Thus, the optimal treatment strategy of AVE has yet to be defined. METHODS: A nationwide survey on infective AVE was conducted, including 64 cardiac surgical departments responding to a 41-item questionnaire. The evaluation included common surgical practice, routine diagnostic steps, surgical techniques, perioperative medical treatment, as well as postoperative management. RESULTS: Remarkable differences were observed among the participating institutions, including the following components of the treatment: (1) standardization and extent of the use of imaging techniques and (2) success rate in identification AVE-causing germs, (3) timing of operation in case of cerebral embolization, and (4) choice of valve prosthesis for aortic valve replacement for infective AVE. CONCLUSION: The findings of this survey underline the need for a nationwide registry to further elucidate the nature and course of AVE in Germany, as well as to serve as a solid basis for prospective trials, addressing the most important clinical purposes in the diagnosis and treatment of AVE.

Electrophysiological Stimulation of Whole Heart Constructs in an 8-Pole Electrical Field.

Today 2D and 3D electrophysiological stimulation represents a well established concept to enhance myocardial development and maturation in tissue-engineered constructs. However, electrical field stimulation has never been adapted to complex whole heart constructs (WHC). This study demonstrates the impact of three-dimensional electrophysiological stimulation of tissue-engineered WHC in a custom made eight-pole electrical field stimulation system by short model cultivations with neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (CM). Therefore, WHC were generated by repopulation of decellularized rat hearts with neonatal CM and subjected to perfusion based cultivation with or without additional biophysicalstimulation for 96 h. Spontaneous electrophysiological (EP) activity of the processed WHC was analyzed by qualitative evaluation of multielectrode assay (MEA) signal sequences, descriptive comparative spike sorting, and direct contrasting assessment in simple numerical quantities complemented by impulse response tests after phasing out spontaneous EP activity. As strong reduction of voltage signals by the decellularized extracellular matrix (ECM) component of WHC was observed, the active principle was determined and used to estimate the spectrum of source signals to recorded values by calculative elimination. Western blotting of key myocardial markers was employed to substantiate the functional EP evaluation by classical biochemical analysis. We observed stable spontaneous EP activity showing clear R and S, but predominantly rS patterns, for both stimulated WHC and non-stimulated controls. By the impact of stimulation, mean voltage amplitudes and beating frequencies could be significantly increased. The active principle of signal reduction in decellularized ECM could be shown to follow a nonlinear damping function with remarkable accuracy, illustrating that recorded signals of moderate voltage amplitudes can also represent far-field measurements of strong signals that are emitted in distant depths of the ECM while small amplitudes are limited to actually represent also rather weak source-signals. After phasing out spontaneous activity, both stimulated WHC and non-stimulated controls could be excited again to emit immediate impulse responses. The observed beneficial impact of 8-pole field stimulation on functional EP activity could finally be validated on the biochemical level by showing increased ratios for myosin heavy chain, cardiac tropnin T, desmin, and connexin 43 for stimulated WHC by Western blot analysis. In conclusion, we found that although electrophysiological stimulation has been incorporated into the whole heart tissue-engineered concept from the very beginning, this study presents for the first time a concept for the transfer of electrical field stimulation to the whole heart tissue-engineered approach. Furthermore to the best knowledge of the authors, this is the first control-based study showing a comparative investigation of electrophysiological stimulation of whole heart constructs.