RESUMO
Candidemia may present as severe and life-threatening infections and is associated with a high mortality rate. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors associated with 30-day mortality in patients with candidemia. A multi-center prospective observational study was conducted in seven university hospitals in six provinces in the western part of Turkey. Patient data were collected with a structured form between January 2018 and April 2019. In total, 425 episodes of candidemia were observed during the study period. Two hundred forty-one patients died within 30 days, and the 30-day crude mortality rate was 56.7%. Multivariable analysis found that SOFA score (OR: 1.28, CI: 1.154-1.420, p < 0.001), parenteral nutrition (OR: 3.9, CI: 1.752-8.810, p = 0.001), previous antibacterial treatment (OR: 9.32, CI: 1.634-53.744, p = 0.012), newly developed renal failure after candidemia (OR: 2.7, CI: 1.079-6.761, p = 0.034), and newly developed thrombocytopenia after candidemia (OR: 2.6, CI: 1. 057-6.439, p = 0.038) were significantly associated with 30-day mortality. Central venous catheter removal was the only factor protective against mortality (OR: 0.34, CI:0.147-0.768, p = 0.010) in multivariable analysis. Candidemia mortality is high in patients with high SOFA scores, those receiving TPN therapy, and those who previously received antibacterial therapy. Renal failure and thrombocytopenia developing after candidemia should be followed carefully in patients. Antifungal therapy and removing the central venous catheter are essential in the management of candidemia.
Assuntos
Candidemia , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Candida , Candidemia/tratamento farmacológico , Candidemia/mortalidade , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Remoção de Dispositivo , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Turquia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Physicians hospitalize the patients with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) when they need intravenous antibiotics and outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is unavailable. Daily inpatient antimicrobial therapy is an alternative to hospitalization, which is similar to OPAT; patients go home after they are administered antibiotics in a separate room in the hospital setting. OBJECTIVES: We assessed our previous daily inpatient practice to revitalize the model in the COVID-19 era. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and microbiological responses and the cost effectiveness of the patients with cUTIs who received daily inpatient ertapenem therapy. RESULTS: Our study population was 136 patients in 156 episodes. It was a difficult-to-treat group with older age (mean 63.0 ± 14.8 years) and a high burden of underlying conditions (86.5%). The most common causative organisms were Escherichia coli (74.4%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (19.2%); 89.7% of the isolates were producing extended-spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL). The microbiologic and clinical success rates were 82.1% and 95.5%, respectively. The patients required hospitalization in 16 episodes (10.2%) because of clinical failures (3.8%), superinfections (2%), planned invasive interventions (3.2%), and side effects (1.2%). Our university hospital saved 1608 bed-days and 2596 (9702 TL) bed costs. CONCLUSIONS: In the COVID-19 pandemic period, this seems to be an effective, safe, and cost-effective way to decrease hospitalizations for cUTIs in settings where OPAT is unavailable.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecções por Escherichia coli , Infecções Urinárias , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Ertapenem , Infecções por Escherichia coli/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Escherichia coli/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , beta-LactamasesRESUMO
Background/aim: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients have increased risk of tuberculosis (TB). We aimed to investigate the prevalence and features of TB in liver transplant (LT) recipients at our transplantation canter. Materials and methods: All patients who underwent LT between January 2004 and December 2013 and whose data were accessible were included in the study. Demographic features, tuberculin skin test (TST) results, and TB prevalence were recorded. Characteristics of LT recipients who developed TB were evaluated. Results: A total of 403 patients underwent LT during this period. Mean age was 47.27 ± 11.04 years; 280 (69.47%) were males. The TST was administered to 108 (25.91%) and the QuantiFERON-TB test to 1 patient. TST positivity was determined in 28 (25.93%). Latent TB infection (LTBI) treatment was not recommended to any of the LT candidates. In the posttransplant period, 5 patients (1.24%) developed TB over a median duration of 14 (min: 7, max: 84) months, 2 of whom were found to have had LTBI in the pretransplant period. Conclusion: The prevalence of TB in LT recipients at our center was similar to that in the current literature. LTBI screening, including risk factor assessment and TST/QuantiFERON-TB testing, is necessary in the early diagnostic workup for TB in LT recipients.
RESUMO
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is among the most common important viral infections in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Diagnostic tests for detecting CMV replication are widely used for this group of patients, however there is no clear agreement on the cut-off levels for interpretation of clinical decisions especially when the low level of viral load is detected. In this study, CMV pp65 antigenemia test results were compared with plasma CMV-DNA levels detected by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in samples of kidney and liver transplant recipients in the Central Laboratory of Dokuz Eylul University Hospital between 2011 and 2013, and the correlation between these two tests and viral load equivalent to antigenemia positivity were determined. In the study, pp65 antigenemia and CMV-DNA qPCR results were evaluated retrospectively. The samples from the same patients were included if the time between antigenemia and CMV-DNA qPCR tests were less than 48 hours. SPSS v15.0 was used for correlation, regression and ROC curve analysis. The results of the 217 samples collected from 100 patients (59 male, 41 female; age range: 16-71, mean age: 46 ± 13 years), 36 liver and 64 kidney recipients were evaluated in the study. Of the patients 80% were CMV IgM negative, IgG positive; 1% was CMV IgG and IgM positive; 2% were CMV IgM and IgG negative, while for 17 patients serological results could not be reached. CMV pp65 antigenemia and CMV-DNA were both negative in 102 (47%) samples, while both were positive in 37 (17%) samples. The single sample from a case with CMV IgM and IgG positivity yielded negative results for both antigenemia and CMV-DNA tests. In 78 samples antigenemia were negative and CMV-DNA qPCR were positive, while there were no samples with antigenemia positive and qPCR negative. Mean values of antigenemia and qPCR tests were 23 positive cells/200.000 leukocytes (range: 1 to 230 positive cells) and 12.595 copies/ml (range: 180 to 106.311 copies/ml), respectively. There was a significant correlation between antigenemia and qPCR results among the samples that were positive by both assays (r= 0.785). ROC curve analysis showed that CMV viral load of 205 copies/ml in plasma corresponds to ≥ 1 pp65 antigen positive cells per 200.000 leukocytes (sensitivity: 91.7%, specificity: 90.3%). Higher analytical sensitivity of qPCR test can be explained by the results of CMV-DNA PCR positive and antigenemia negative samples. Non-existence of samples with antigen positive and PCR negative results supported this finding. ROC analysis showed that any sample with CMV-DNA qPCR result less than 205 copies/ml, could be accepted as pp65 antigenemia negative. This viral load value is valid only for the studied patient group and assays, therefore could be changed according to study population and tests.
Assuntos
Antígenos Virais/sangue , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Citomegalovirus/isolamento & purificação , DNA Viral/sangue , Transplante de Órgãos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Citomegalovirus/genética , Citomegalovirus/imunologia , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Transplante de Rim , Transplante de Fígado , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Carga Viral , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Guidelines include the recommendations of experts from various specialties within a topic in consideration of data specific to each country. However, to date there has not been a guideline standardizing the nomenclature and offering recommendations for intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) in Turkey. This is mainly due to the paucity of laboratory studies regarding the clinical diagnosis and treatment of IAIs or the sensitivity of microorganisms isolated from patients with IAIs. However, due to the diversification of host characteristics and advancements in technological treatment methods, it has become imperative to 'speak a common language'. For this purpose May 2015, a group of 15 experts in intra-abdominal infections, under the leadership of the Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Specialty Society of Turkey (EKMUD) and with representatives from the Turkish Surgical Association, Turkish Society of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Hernia Society, Turkish Society of Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery, and the Turkish Society of Hospital Infections and Control, was formed to analyze relevant studies in the literature. Ultimately, the suggestions for adults found in this consensus report were developed using available data from Turkey, referring predominantly to the 2010 guidelines for diagnosing and managing complicated IAIs in adults and children by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the Surgical Infection Society. The recommendations are presented in two sections, from the initial diagnostic evaluation of patients to the treatment approach for IAI. This Consensus Report was presented at the EKMUD 2016 Congress in Antalya and was subsequently opened for suggestions on the official websites of the Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Specialty Society of Turkey and Turkish Surgical Association for one month. The manuscript was revised according to the feedback received.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation remains unclear in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving ocrelizumab. We aimed to assess HBV seroprevalence and reactivation risk in MS patients on ocrelizumab and to evaluate the effectiveness of antiviral prophylaxis against HBV reactivation. METHODS: In this single-center, cross-sectional study, 400 people with MS receiving ocrelizumab were screened for HBV at baseline and antiviral prophylaxis was implemented based on serological results. Patients were monitored for HBV reactivation, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 56 (14%) patients who had serology compatible with occult or resolved HBV infection, 49 (85.7%) received antiviral prophylaxis regularly and had no HBV reactivation during the follow-up. Reactivation of HBV occurred in 2 out of 7 (28.6%) patients who did not receive antiviral prophylaxis and in one patient who did not adhere to the prophylaxis regimen. All patients with reactivation had anti-HBs levels below 100 mIU/mL and the median titer was significantly lower than the patients with no HBV reactivation (p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: This study highlights a 14% anti-HBc positivity, indicating a potential risk for HBV reactivation in people with MS receiving ocrelizumab. This suggests the importance of vigilant monitoring and the implementation of prophylactic measures. Our recommendation emphasizes antiviral prophylaxis, particularly for patients with low anti-HBs, and a pre-emptive strategy for others.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Vírus da Hepatite B , Hepatite B , Fatores Imunológicos , Esclerose Múltipla , Ativação Viral , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Hepatite B/epidemiologia , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Transversais , Turquia/epidemiologia , Ativação Viral/efeitos dos fármacos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Vírus da Hepatite B/fisiologia , Vírus da Hepatite B/efeitos dos fármacos , Antivirais , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: To ensure the appropriate usage of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), recently introduced in our hospital, we aimed to determine susceptibility rates, enzyme analysis, and clonal relationship among strains, together with clinical data. METHODOLOGY: Between June 1 and September 30, 2021, demographic and microbiological data of the patients were recorded. In the obtained samples, meropenem and colistin minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) levels, carbapenem resistance genes, and the clonal relationship were studied by molecular methods. CAZ-AVI was not used in any of the patients. RESULTS: 140 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae were isolated from 57 patients. Resistance to CAZ-AVI was found in 76 (54.3%) strains. Out of 57 patients, 31 (54.4%) isolates could be reached. Meropenem MIC level was ≥ 32 µg/mL in 26 (83.9%), and colistin MIC level was ≥ 4 µg/mL in 17 (54.8%) isolates. Enzyme analysis revealed NDM in 20 (64.5%), OXA-48 in 17 (54.8%), and KPC in seven (22.6%). NDM + OXA-48 was determined in 10 (32.2%) strains. NDM was determined in all CAZ-AVI resistant strains, OXA-48 in 16.1% (2/5) strains. Seven genotypes were detected. The largest cluster was genotype 3 clusters (11 isolates). Of 31 patients, 22 (71.0%) died. CAZ-AVI was susceptible in one of the patients who survived and four who died. CONCLUSIONS: Before using a new antibiotic, each center should determine the basal data and phenotypic/genotypic resistance ratios specific to that antibiotic. While a high NDM rate and low CAZ-AVI sensitivity limit the use of the drug in our center, it is clear that CAZ-AVI use in sensitive strains will decrease mortality.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Compostos Azabicíclicos , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos , Ceftazidima , Combinação de Medicamentos , Infecções por Klebsiella , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Humanos , Ceftazidima/farmacologia , Ceftazidima/uso terapêutico , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Compostos Azabicíclicos/farmacologia , Compostos Azabicíclicos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Klebsiella/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Klebsiella/microbiologia , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/genética , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , beta-Lactamases/genética , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/genéticaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) screening is strongly recommended in the pre-transplant evaluation of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, although it remains inadequate in many transplant centers. We decided to investigate pre-transplant TB risk assessment, LTBI treatment, and registry rates in Turkey. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adult SOT recipients who underwent tuberculin skin test (TST) and/or interferon-gamma release test (IGRA) from 14 centers between 2015 and 2019 were included in the study. An induration of ≥5 mm on TST and/or probable/positive IGRA (QuantiFERON-TB) was considered positive for LTBI. Demographic features, LTBI screening and treatment, and pre-/post-transplant TB history were recorded from the electronic database of transplantation units across the country and pooled at a single center for a unified database. RESULTS: TST and/or IGRA were performed in 766 (33.8%) of 2266 screened patients most of whom were kidney transplant recipients (n = 485, 63.4%). LTBI screening test was positive in 359 (46.9%) patients, and isoniazid was given to 203 (56.5%) patients. Of the patients treated for LTBI, 112 (55.2%) were registered in the national registry, and 82 (73.2%) completed the treatment. Tuberculosis developed in 6 (1.06%) of 563 patients who were not offered LTBI treatment. CONCLUSION: We determined that overall, only one-third of SOT recipients in our country were evaluated in terms of TB risk, only 1 of the 2 SOT recipients with LTBI received treatment, and half were registered. Therefore, we want to emphasize the critical importance of pretransplant TB risk stratification and registration, guided by revised national guidelines.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Due to elderly residents, nursing homes/assisted living facilities were the most affected places in COVID-19 pandemic. Besides symptomatic patients, asymptomatic patients were detected during routine screening. AIM: This study aims to determine the factors that affect antibody response and viral shedding in stool samples after natural exposure to the virus in residents and staff who recovered from COVID-19 before the vaccine was available. METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the nation's highest-capacity Residential and Nursing Home. Blood samples were collected between December 15, 2020 and January 15, 2021 from participating residents and staff for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing. Stool samples were obtained for SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing 2 months after COVID-19. The Social Sciences (SPSS) program version 15.0 was used for statistical analysis. The Mann-Whitney U test compared SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentration between two groups. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-four (52.3%) residents and 424 (47.7%) staff participated. Entirely 259 (29.2%) participants were anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG (+) and 255 (28.7%) were SARS-CoV-2 PCR (+). Both antibody and PCR positivity was detected in 196 (76.9%). In PCR (-) group, 63 (10.0%) participants were SARS-CoV-2 IgG (+). Antibody titers were found highest in SARS-CoV-2 PCR (+) male residents. SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers were significantly high in SARS-CoV-2 PCR (+) and hospitalized participants regardless of age. Stool samples were obtained from 61(23.9%) participants and were found negative. CONCLUSION: A durable SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response was monitored at least 9 months after the participants were diagnosed with COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 antibody positivity was detected 76.9% in PCR (+) and 10.0% in PCR (-) participants. Knowing the duration of detectable antibodies is an important finding for developing disease prevention and public health strategies.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Assistência de Longa Duração , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Estudos Transversais , Pandemias , Estudos Prospectivos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacinação , Imunoglobulina GRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We aimed to examine the comorbidity, disease progress, and vaccination status of liver transplant patients followed up in our hospital who had COVID-19. METHODS: Liver transplant patients with COVID-19 were included between 11 March 2020 and 15 September 2022. Demographic data, disease progress, and COVID-19 vaccines were recorded. The SPSS 24.0 (IBM SPSS, Inc, Armonk, NY, United States) program was used for analysis. The data were analyzed using the χ2 test. P values < .05 were considered clinically significant. RESULTS: Sixteen SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (+) patients were detected. Twelve (75.0%) patients were male; the mean age was 49.56 ± 14.0 years (24-76 years). The mean transplant time was 156.69 ± 54.05 months. Four (25.0%) of the 5 (31.3%) patients with comorbidities had hypertension, and 1 (6.3%) had diabetes. None of the patients had an underlying lung disease. All the patients received immunosuppressive therapy, and the most common combination was antimetabolite and calcineurin inhibitor (9 patients [69.2%]). Nine patients (56.3%) had a fever, whereas 6 (37.5%) had respiratory symptoms. Two (33.3%) had pneumonia. Five (31.4%) patients were hospitalized, and 1 (20%) was admitted to the intensive care unit due to non-invasive mechanical ventilation needs. No patient died due to COVID-19. A statistically significant correlation was found between the presence of fever, respiratory symptoms, and hospitalization (P < .05). Of those vaccinated, 10 (66.7%) were infected before the COVID-19 vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: The course of COVID-19 in liver recipients without any underlying disease other than transplantation is not different from that in the healthy population. Immunosuppressive therapy was continued in patients with the disease, and two-thirds did not require hospitalization.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transplante de Fígado , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Hospitais Universitários , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , SARS-CoV-2 , TransplantadosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although there is limited data about the role of infectious diseases and clinical microbiology (IDCM) consultations in the Emergency Department (ED), they have a key role in deciding on hospitalization and appropriate use of antibiotics. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who visited the ED of our hospital and underwent an IDCM consultation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we reviewed the medical records of adult patients who visited the ED of our hospital between May and August 2021 and needed IDCM consultation. The demographic data, the date and time of admission and consultation, the departments that were consulted before IDCM, laboratory results, diagnosis, and outcome were recorded. RESULTS: Out of 42,116 ED visits, 1,007 (2.4%) IDCM consultations were requested. The median time between admission and IDCM consultation was 239 min (150.0-373.5). Before 56.9% of IDCM consultations, pre-consultations were requested from other departments, and the time interval was significantly longer. The median age of patients was 68 years (51-77 years). Infections were confirmed by the IDCM physician in 79.6% of the consultations. The most diagnosed infections were urinary tract infections (32.4%), skin-soft tissue infections (16.9%) and lower respiratory tract infections (10.3%), whereas 9.3% of the consultations resulted in hospitalization to the infection ward, 25.1% to other wards, and 5% to the intensive care unit (ICU). CONCLUSIONS: Two of 3 consultations resulted in hospitalization in other wards, and this shows that IDCM consultations are beneficial for managing patients with infectious diseases hospitalized in other departments. Communication between IDCM specialists and ED colleagues is important, especially in the management of elderly patients who require a multidisciplinary approach.
RESUMO
Although Fusarium spp. rarely cause infections in healthy people, they can cause fusariosis, particularly in neutropenic hematological malignancies, bone marrow transplant patients, and immunocompromised patients, such as those with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), and rarely in solid organ transplant recipients. Here, we present a case of a liver transplant recipient with F. solani species complex (FSSC) infection treated with posaconazole. A 61-year-old man presented with multiple itchy, painful, palpable, irregular, subcutaneous nodules on the right leg and total dystrophic onychomycosis in the right toenails. Incisional skin biopsies of the lesions were performed, and the samples were sent to the pathology and mycology laboratories for analysis. The clinical isolate was identified as FSSC using phenotypic, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry, and genotypic methods. Liposomal amphotericin B could not be administered owing to the development of side effects; hence, the patient was treated with posaconazole for 4 months. While some nodular lesions disappeared completely under this treatment, the others showed dimensional regression. This is the first case of FSSC infection with skin and nail involvement in a non-neutropenic, liver transplant patient in Turkey. Fusariosis may develop with rare species, such as FSSC, as first reported in this case of a liver transplant patient. Regardless of the species, amphotericin B is the first choice for treating fusariosis; however, posaconazole is an effective and safe alternative to amphotericin B.
Assuntos
Fusariose , Fusarium , Transplante de Fígado , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fusariose/diagnóstico , Fusariose/tratamento farmacológico , Anfotericina B/uso terapêutico , Antifúngicos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Characterizing the post-COVID health conditions is helpful to direct patients to appropriate healthcare. AIMS: To describe the presence of symptoms in COVID-19 patients within 6 months after diagnosis and to investigate the associated factors in terms of reporting symptoms. METHODS: Data of DEU-COVIMER (a telephone interview-based COVID-19 follow-up center established in a tertiary care hospital) was analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 RNA positive participants aged ≥ 18 years from November 1st, 2020, to May 31st, 2021. Symptom frequencies were stratified by demographic and clinical characteristics at one, three, and 6 months after diagnosis. With the patients who had symptoms at baseline, generalized estimating equations were applied to identify the factors associated with reporting of symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 5610 patients agreed to participate in the study. Symptom frequency was 37.2%, 21.8%, and 18.2% for the first, third, and sixth months. Tiredness/fatigue, muscle or body aches, and dyspnea/difficulty breathing were the most common symptoms in all time frames. In multivariate analysis, older age, female gender (odds ratio OR 1.74, 95% confidence interval 1.57-1.93), bad economic status (OR 1.37, 1.14-1.65), current smoking (OR 1.15, 1.02-1.29), being fully vaccinated before COVID-19 (OR 0.53, 0.40-0.72), having more health conditions (≥ 3 conditions, OR 1.78, 1.33-2.37), having more symptoms (> 5 symptoms, OR 2.47, 2.19-2.78), and hospitalization (intensive care unit, OR 2.18, 1.51-3.14) were associated with reporting of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies risk factors for patients who experience post-COVID-19 symptoms. Healthcare providers should appropriately allocate resources prioritizing the patients who would benefit from post-COVID rehabilitation.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Feminino , COVID-19/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos Longitudinais , RNA Viral , Hospitalização , Síndrome de COVID-19 Pós-Aguda , Fadiga , Dispneia/epidemiologia , Dispneia/etiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: It was the aim of this study to evaluate the efficacy of single-dose fosfomycin prophylaxis as an alternative to fluoroquinolone-based prophylaxis in transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate (TRUSBP). METHODS: We evaluated the records of 620 patients who had undergone TRUSBP from January 2010 to July 2011. Patients received a single dose of 3 g oral fosfomycin or a single dose of 500 mg oral levofloxacin or 500 mg oral ciprofloxacin twice daily administered for 5 days starting 1 day before the prophylaxis procedure. We reviewed all febrile and afebrile urinary tract infections (UTIs) within 1 month after TRUSBP. RESULTS: Of the 620 patients, 19 (3.0%) developed febrile UTI and 51 (8.2%) developed afebrile UTI after biopsy. Of the 19 patients with febrile UTI, 1/19 (5.2%) received fosfomycin, 4/19 (21%) received levofloxacin and 14/19 (73.6%) received ciprofloxacin for prophylaxis. Of the 51 patients with afebrile UTI, 4/51 (7.8%) received fosfomycin, 8/51 (15.6%) received levofloxacin and 39/51 (76.4%) received ciprofloxacin for prophylaxis. There were a total of 10 fluoroquinolone-resistant infections, and all of them occurred after the ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin prophylaxis and none after fosfomycin prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: The ease of use of fosfomycin, reducing the rate of fluoroquinolone-resistant infections and hospitalizations shows that it would be an alternative and effective drug for antimicrobial prophylaxis in TRUSBP.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Fosfomicina/administração & dosagem , Levofloxacino , Ofloxacino/administração & dosagem , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Próstata/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia por Agulha/métodos , Humanos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ultrassonografia de IntervençãoRESUMO
Ocular toxoplasmosis after solid organ transplantation occurs usually within the first three months of primary infection or reactivation of latent infection. There are a few reports of ocular toxoplasmosis following liver transplantation in the literature, however, no reports were detected in the national data. In this report a 35-year-old female patient diagnosed as ocular toxoplasmosis following reactivation in the second year after liver transplantation, was presented. The case was successfully treated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and clindamycin. This case was presented to emphasize late presentation of toxoplasmosis in transplantation patients and to withdraw attention to the importance of serological investigations done before transplantation.
Assuntos
Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Toxoplasmose Ocular/etiologia , Adulto , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Clindamicina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Recidiva , Fatores de Tempo , Toxoplasmose Ocular/diagnóstico , Toxoplasmose Ocular/tratamento farmacológico , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Objective: During the COVID-19 pandemic, antimicrobial and antifungal stewardship programs have lost their priority. Although all parenteral antifungals were used with the recommendations of infectious diseases specialists in the pre-pandemic period, most consultations were delayed during the pandemic because of the workload of infectious diseases specialists. In this period, antifungal treatments in hospitalized patients were managed by mostly primary physicians. Therefore, we aimed to detect the change in the consumption of antifungals during the pandemic. Materials and Methods: The data on the antifungal drug use by month and clinics, the number of beds, and the occupancy rate of the clinics were obtained from the hospital information registration system. We defined each drug according to the World Health Organization Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (WHO ATC) coding system and determined the defined daily dose (DDD). The antifungal consumption (DDD/ 100 bed-days) in pre-pandemic and pandemic periods was compared. Results: During the pandemic, the antifungal consumption increased two-fold (2019:7.43; 2020:18.03 DDD/100 bed-days). The highest antifungal consumption rate was in the hematology- oncology-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) clinics with 2.5-fold (2019:39.86; 2020:98.48 DDD/ 100 bed-days) increase. Liposomal amphotericin B consumption made up the majority of this with a four-fold increase in the hematology-oncology-HSCT clinics. Conclusion: We detected a dramatic increase in antifungal consumption in both ICUs and inpatient clinics during pandemic. A novel antifungal stewardship approach is urgently needed.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Tuberculosis risk in solid-organ transplant recipients is more than the general population, although tuberculosis incidence has been reported to decrease 5% in the last decade in Turkey. In Turkey, solid-organ transplants started in 1975; however, routine pretransplant tuberculosis risk screening programs are still not established. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of tuberculosis prevalence, clinical forms, and prognosis of tuberculosis in solid-organ transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, EBSCOhost, and Scopus databases in English and Turkish Medical Index of Turkish Academic Network and Information Center, Turkish Citation Index, Turkish Medline, Central Thesis of ULAKBIM databases in Turkish (from inception until December 2018) for national and international reference lists of all relevant papers. We used standard methodological procedures (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2009). RESULTS: We found 199 published studies in English and 26 in Turkish. After exclusion of noneligible studies, there were 10 retrospective research articles and 16 case reports. There were 148 (3.2%) tuberculosis cases with 4553 solid-organ transplant recipients (4031 renal, 522 liver). Of the tuberculosis cases, 50 (33.8%) were pulmonary, 21 (14.2%) were pulmonary and extrapulmonary, 13 (8.8%) were miliary, 27 (18.2%) were disseminated, and 37 (25.0%) were extra-pulmonary tuberculosis cases involving a maximum of 2 organs. There were 19 cases (12.8%) of graft lost. Of the patients with tuberculosis, 34 (19.9%) died resulting from either tuberculosis or other reasons. CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis, most of the centers did not perform pretransplant risk evaluations; every center had different clinical procedures and follow-ups. Tuberculosis prevalence in solid-organ transplant recipients differs according to study population. Case reports were mostly about extrapulmonary tuberculosis. All such patients should be followed-up by a standard regimen during pretransplant and posttransplant periods. Prospective studies should be considered.
Assuntos
Transplante de Órgãos , Tuberculose , Humanos , Transplante de Órgãos/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Órgãos/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplantados , Resultado do Tratamento , Tuberculose/diagnóstico , Tuberculose/epidemiologia , Turquia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the management of patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care units (ICUs) with fungal infection/colonization and to highlight diagnostic problems in these patients. METHODS: We included all patients with a COVID-19 diagnosis who were aged ≥18 years and followed in the ICU for the first 8 months. Patient data were obtained from medical records. We compared the risk factors, laboratory data, and outcomes of patients with fungal infection/colonization. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients (81 men and 37 women) were included. The mean age was 70.3 ± 14.8 (35-94) years. Of the patients, 79 (66.9%) patients were ≥65 years old. Fungal infection/colonization was detected in 39 (33.1%) patients. Fungi were isolated from 34 (28.8%) patients. Ten fungal species were isolated from 51 samples (the most common being Candida albicans). Three patients (2.5%) had proven candidemia. We observed two (1.7%) possible cases of COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA). Eighteen patients (15.3%) underwent antifungal therapy. The risk of fungal infection/colonization increased as the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation increased. The fatality rate was 61.9% and increased with age and the use of mechanical ventilation. The fatality rate was 4.2-times-higher and the use of mechanical ventilation was 35.9-times-higher in the patients aged ≥65 years than in the patients aged <65 years. No relationship was found between fungal colonization/infection, antifungal treatment, and the fatality rate. CONCLUSION: During the pandemic, approximately one-third of the patients in ICUs exhibited fungal infection/colonization. Candida albicans was the most common species of fungal infection as in the pre-pandemic area. Because of the cross-contamination risk, we did not performed diagnostic bronchoscopy and control thorax computed tomography during the ICU stay, and our patients mainly received empirical antifungal therapy.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Candidemia , Candidíase , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Candidíase/diagnóstico , Candidíase/tratamento farmacológico , Candidíase/microbiologia , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Teste para COVID-19 , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Candidemia/tratamento farmacológico , Candida albicansRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In patients with coronavirus disease 2019, the gastrointestinal symptoms have been reported increasingly in addition to the respiratory system symptoms. The studies show that the prevalence of gastrointestinal system symptoms and how the gastrointestinal system contributes to the severity and prognosis of the disease is still not clear. This study aims to find the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms and the correlation between the gastrointestinal symptoms and the clinical results in hospitalized patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzes patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 and hospitalized in the pandemic unit between March 2020 and August 2020 and compares their demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory and radiologic findings, coronavirus disease 2019 treatments received, the clinical course of the disease, and the gastrointestinal symptoms. RESULTS: In our study, we included 322 patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 and hospitalized; 39 patients (12.1%) were admitted to the hospital with at least one gastrointestinal symptom (nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and the loss of taste). Nausea and vomiting are the most common gastrointestinal symptoms with a prevalence of 7.1%, followed by diarrhea with 2.8%, the loss of taste with 2.2%, and abdominal pain with 1.5%. The mean age and D-dimer levels of the patients showing gastrointestinal symptoms were lower than those who did not have any gastrointestinal symptoms. We did not find a significant correlation between the presence of the gastrointestinal symptoms and the severity of the disease, treatment received, risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome and septic shock, admission to the intensive care unit, the need for mechanical ventilation, the mortality rate or the length of hospitalization in the medical floor or the intensive care unit. CONCLUSION: In this study, we observed that 12.1% of coronavirus disease 2019 patients apply to the hospital due to gastrointestinal symptoms. Furthermore, the gastrointestinal symptoms do not seem to affect the severity and the course of the disease, it is important to identify coronavirus disease 2019 patients showing unusual symptoms such as the gastrointestinal symptoms at an early stage to protect healthcare professionals from infection risk.
Assuntos
Ageusia , COVID-19 , Gastroenteropatias , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Turquia/epidemiologia , Gastroenteropatias/epidemiologia , Gastroenteropatias/diagnóstico , Diarreia/epidemiologia , Diarreia/etiologia , Dor Abdominal/epidemiologia , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Vômito , NáuseaRESUMO
Background and objectives: Although several repurposed antiviral drugs have been used for the treatment of COVID-19, only a few such as remdesivir and molnupiravir have shown promising effects. The objectives of our study were to investigate the association of repurposed antiviral drugs with COVID-19 morbidity. Methods: Patients admitted to 26 different hospitals located in 16 different provinces between March 11-July 18, 2020, were enrolled. Case definition was based on WHO criteria. Patients were managed according to the guidelines by Scientific Board of Ministry of Health of Turkey. Primary outcomes were length of hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) requirement, and intubation. Results: We retrospectively evaluated 1,472 COVID-19 adult patients; 57.1% were men (mean age = 51.9 ± 17.7years). A total of 210 (14.3%) had severe pneumonia, 115 (7.8%) were admitted to ICUs, and 69 (4.7%) were intubated during hospitalization. The median (interquartile range) of duration of hospitalization, including ICU admission, was 7 (5-12) days. Favipiravir (n = 328), lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 55), and oseltamivir (n = 761) were administered as antiviral agents, and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ, n = 1,382) and azithromycin (n = 738) were used for their immunomodulatory activity. Lopinavir/ritonavir (ß [95% CI]: 4.71 [2.31-7.11]; p = 0.001), favipiravir (ß [95% CI]: 3.55 [2.56-4.55]; p = 0.001) and HCQ (ß [95% CI]: 0.84 [0.02-1.67]; p = 0.046) were associated with increased risk of lengthy hospital stays. Furthermore, favipiravir was associated with increased risks of ICU admission (OR [95% CI]: 3.02 [1.70-5.35]; p = 0.001) and invasive mechanical ventilation requirement (OR [95% CI]: 2.94 [1.28-6.75]; p = 0.011). Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that antiviral drugs including lopinavir, ritonavir, and favipiravir were associated with negative clinical outcomes such as increased risks for lengthy hospital stay, ICU admission, and invasive mechanical ventilation requirement. Therefore, repurposing such agents without proven clinical evidence might not be the best approach for COVID-19 treatment.