The effect of nefopam on lactation after caesarean section: a single-blind randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Nefopam is a centrally acting analgesic which has a theoretical risk of stopping lactation due to its anticholinergic and dopaminergic effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nefopam on lactation and to investigate potential adverse effects on newborns. METHODS: Seventy-two women, scheduled to undergo a caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia and wanting to breastfeed, were randomised to one of two groups: nefopam (20mg, six hourly) or paracetamol (1g, six hourly). In both groups, postoperative analgesia was supplemented with ketoprofen (50mg, six hourly) in conjunction with intrathecal morphine 0.1mg. The primary outcome was onset of lactation, estimated by weighing the newborns before and after feeding; by maternal perception of breast fullness and based on serum prolactin concentration 48hours postpartum. Secondary outcomes were neonatal adverse effects evaluated by neurobehavioural score at 12, 24, 48, and 72hours after birth. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi-squared, Fisher exact and Student t tests as appropriate. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The difference in the weight of the newborn before and after each feed, maternal perception of breast fullness and serum prolactin did not significantly differ between groups. The volume of artificial milk given to newborns of mothers in the nefopam group on days two and three was significantly greater than for the paracetamol group. Neurobehavioural scores were comparable at each time point. CONCLUSION: Nefopam does not appear to delay the onset of lactation or present any clear risk to the newborn.

Do prophylactic prostaglandins reduce the transfusion rate at cesarean section in high-order multiple pregnancies?

OBJECTIVE: Cesarean section is the more usual mode of delivery in high-order multiple pregnancy (> or =3). Excessive uterine distension increases the risk of bleeding and the need for transfusion. The aim of this study was to investigate if prophylactic use of prostaglandins at cesarean section for high-order multiple pregnancies reduces blood loss and transfusion requirement based on historic data. STUDY DESIGN: We studied a prospective series of 28 parturients with high-order multiple pregnancy (group 2) who were treated, after clamping the last umbilical cord, with oxytocin (5IU intravenous then 35IU in a 24h infusion) combined with intravenous prostaglandin. A comparable retrospective series of 14 patients (group 1) had been given oxytocin alone at the same dose. Postoperative serum hemoglobin and transfusion rate as well as adverse effects were compared between the two groups. Student's t-test was used to compare continuous variables. Chi square test and Fisher exact test were used to compare categorical variables. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable for anthropometric data and duration of pregnancy. None of the patients in group 2 required red cell transfusion while 21.4% of those in group 1 required transfusion. A significant lower decrease of postoperative haemoglobin is noted in group 2 (P=0.0006). Multivariate analysis using variables significant at univariate analysis and pre-eclampsia confirmed this difference. There were no adverse reactions to treatment. CONCLUSION: In our experience, prophylactic prostaglandin infusion at cesarean section in high-order multiple pregnancy is associated with a lower need for per operative red cell transfusion and a higher postoperative hemoglobin level. This observation merits confirmation in larger studies.