Artificial intelligence for the optimal management of community-acquired pneumonia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This timely review explores the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) management, emphasizing its relevance in predicting the risk of hospitalization. With CAP remaining a global public health concern, the review highlights the need for efficient and reliable AI tools to optimize resource allocation and improve patient outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Challenges in CAP management delve into the application of AI in predicting CAP-related hospitalization risks, and complications, and mortality. The integration of AI-based risk scores in managing CAP has the potential to enhance the accuracy of predicting patients at higher risk, facilitating timely intervention and resource allocation. Moreover, AI algorithms reduce variability associated with subjective clinical judgment, promoting consistency in decision-making, and provide real-time risk assessments, aiding in the dynamic management of patients with CAP. SUMMARY: The development and implementation of AI-tools for hospitalization in CAP represent a transformative approach to improving patient outcomes. The integration of AI into healthcare has the potential to revolutionize the way we identify and manage individuals at risk of severe outcomes, ultimately leading to more efficient resource utilization and better overall patient care.

Effectiveness and safety profile of mepolizumab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: Real life data in a tertiary care.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is characterized by a type 2 pattern of inflammation. Mepolizumab was approved for the treatment of CRSwNP in 2021, it may be useful to evaluate its safety profile in a real-world setting. AIM: This work aimed to prospectively highlight the effectiveness and safety profile of Mepolizumab in patients with CRSwNP enrolled in the Otorhinolaryngology Unit of the University Hospital of Messina. METHODS: An observational cohort study was carried out considering all patients treated with Mepolizumab. A descriptive analysis was conducted reporting all demographic characteristics, endoscopic evaluations, and symptom conditions. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were treated with Mepolizumab, one patient discontinued the treatment. A statistically significant reduction in the Sino-Nasal Outcome Tests-22 (SNOT-22) and nasal polyp score (NPS) was shown at the 6th and 12th months compared to baseline values (SNOT-22, -33 and - 43, p < 0.001 for both comparisons; NPS, 0 and - 1, p < 0.001 for both comparisons). The median (Q1-Q3) sniffin' sticks test score increased from 7 (6-8) at the 6th month to 11 (10-13) at the 12th month. Seven patients (24.1 %) reported pain at the injection site, accompanied by redness, warmth, and tenderness within the first 24 h post-injection with a median duration of three days from the onset. CONCLUSIONS: Given the optimal treatment response and the minimal adverse effects observed, clinicians should consider Mepolizumab a safe and effective treatment in CRSwNP patients. Further studies in real-life setting are necessary to better understand the long-term effects.

Dupilumab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: Real life data in a multicentric Sicilian experience.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab during the first year of treatment in a real-life setting, focusing on improvement in nasal polyp score (NPS) as well as specific symptoms, quality of life and olfactory function. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL: A multicentric observational cohort study was carried out. A total of 170 patients were enrolled in the Otorhinolaryngology Unit of the three University Hospitals and considered for dupilumab therapy. All recorder characteristics were age (at the first dupilumab application visit), sex, smoke habits, previous local and systemic corticosteroid therapy, history of endoscopic sinus surgery, number of previous endoscopic sinus surgery, concomitant asthma, history of an allergic condition, immunoglobulin E (IgE), allergy to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), Aspirin Exacerbated Respiratory Disease (AERD), other comorbidities associated, blood eosinophils, nasal polyp score, sinonasal outcome test 22 (SNOT 22), sniffin' stick test, the start date of dupilumab therapy and number of doses of dupilumab and eventually, Dupilumab's adverse events related to administration. The Wilcoxon test for dependent samples was performed to compare variables. Statistical significance was assumed for p values < 0.05. RESULTS: A statistically significant reduction in SNOT-22 and NPS was shown at the 6th and 12th month compared to baseline values (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). A statistically significant increase value at the Sniffin' sticks test was shown in the 6th and 12th month compared to baseline values (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). At the 12-month follow-up, according to EUFOREA indications, all patients were considered to remain in treatment with dupilumab and continued the treatment because of a reduced NPS, improved quality of life and a reduced need for system corticosteroids. Dupilumab seemed to be well tolerated by all patients. Any adverse effect of the drug led to the quit of biological treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-centric real-life study supported the effectiveness of dupilumab as an add-on therapy to intranasal corticosteroids in patients with severe uncontrolled CRSwNP in improvement of quality of life, severity of symptoms, polyp size reduction and smell function. Furthermore, our data support the safety profile of monoclonal therapy with dupilumab.

A literature review of 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV2) infection in neonates and children.

At the time of writing, there are already millions of documented infections worldwide by the novel coronavirus 2019 (2019-nCoV or severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2)), with hundreds of thousands of deaths. The great majority of fatal events have been recorded in adults older than 70 years; of them, a large proportion had comorbidities. Since data regarding the epidemiologic and clinical characteristics in neonates and children developing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are scarce and originate mainly from one country (China), we reviewed all the current literature from 1 December 2019 to 7 May 2020 to provide useful information about SARS-CoV2 viral biology, epidemiology, diagnosis, clinical features, treatment, prevention, and hospital organization for clinicians dealing with this selected population. IMPACT: Children usually develop a mild form of COVID-19, rarely requiring high-intensity medical treatment in pediatric intensive care unit. Vertical transmission is unlikely, but not completely excluded. Children with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 must be isolated and healthcare workers should wear appropriate protective equipment. Some clinical features (higher incidence of fever, vomiting and diarrhea, and a longer incubation period) are more common in children than in adults, as well as some radiologic aspects (more patchy shadow opacities on CT scan images than ground-glass opacities). Supportive and symptomatic treatments (oxygen therapy and antibiotics for preventing/treating bacterial coinfections) are recommended in these patients.

Virological and immunological features of SARS-COV-2 infected children with distinct symptomatology.

BACKGROUND: Although SARS-CoV-2 immunizations have started in most countries, children are not currently included in the vaccination programs; thus, it remains crucial to define their anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune response in order to minimize the risk for other epidemic waves. This study sought to provide a description of the virology ad anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunity in children with distinct symptomatology. METHODS: Between March and July 2020, we recruited 15 SARS-CoV-2 asymptomatic (AS) and 51 symptomatic (SY) children, stratified according to WHO clinical classification. We measured SARS-CoV-2 viral load using ddPCR and qPCR in longitudinally collected nasopharyngeal swab samples. To define anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, we measured neutralization activity and total IgG load (DiaSorin). We also evaluated antigen-specific B and CD8+T cells, using a labeled S1+S2 protein and ICAM expression, respectively. Plasma protein profiling was performed with Olink. RESULTS: Virological profiling showed that AS patients had lower viral load at diagnosis (p = .004) and faster virus clearance (p = .0002) compared with SY patients. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral and cellular response did not appear to be associated with the presence of symptoms. AS and SY patients showed similar titers of SARS-CoV-2 IgG, levels of neutralizing activity, and frequency of Ag-specific B and CD8+ T cells, whereas pro-inflammatory plasma protein profile was found to be associated with symptomatology. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the development of anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral and cellular response with any regard to symptomatology, suggesting the ability of both SY and AS patients to contribute toward herd immunity. The virological profiling of AS patients suggested that they have lower virus load associated with faster virus clearance.

Pediatric adverse reactions to antiseizure medications - An analysis of data from the Italian spontaneous reporting system (2001-2019).

INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a valuable supplement to clinical studies in informing about the safety of medications. This is especially relevant for pediatric populations, which are not often included in large-scale clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate patterns of pediatric ADRs to antiseizure medications (ASMs) reported to the Italian Spontaneous Reporting System (SRS) database during the period November 1, 2001─May 31, 2019. METHODS: Suspected ADRs ascribed to medications listed under ATC code N03, plus clobazam (code N05BA09), and affecting individuals below age 18 years were sourced from the Italian SRS database, categorized based on a modification of the MedDRA® high-level term, and analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 956 reports listing a total of 1806 ADRs ascribed to one or more ASMs were received for individuals in pediatric age. The most commonly reported ADRs were skin rashes (24.0% of all reports), epileptic seizures (12.6%), gastrointestinal disturbances (11.8%), and somnolence (10.6%). A more detailed analysis was conducted on 675 reports listing a single ASM as suspected drug and occurring in patients with a specified or presumed diagnosis of epilepsy. Adverse drug reaction patterns differed widely across ASMs. Skin rashes were the most commonly reported ADR for lamotrigine (62.3%), carbamazepine (50.3%), phenobarbital (42.3%), and oxcarbazepine (33.0%). Other most commonly reported ADRs were gastrointestinal symptoms for ethosuximide (44%), irritability/aggression for levetiracetam (25.0%), epileptic seizures for valproic acid (16.1%), fever (often associated with hypohidrosis) for topiramate (17.9%), and utilization error (mostly accidental drug administration) for clonazepam (34.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of spontaneous ADR reports are indicative of major differences in safety profile among individual ASMs. Most, but not all, frequently reported ADRs were in line with findings from clinical trials and observational studies.

Adverse drug reactions with oral anticoagulants: data from sicilian spontaneous reporting system database.

OBJECTIVE: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were developed to avoid the limitations of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). DOACs are associated with a greater incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding and a smaller number of intracranial haemorrhages than VKAs. Therefore, it is important to deepen our knowledge of their safety profiles. The aim of this study was thus to analyse adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports on DOACs and VKAs using the Sicilian Spontaneous Reporting System (SRS) database. METHODS: All ADR reports with DOACs and VKAs as suspected drugs that were entered into the Sicilian SRS database during the period 2001-2019 were selected. In detail, all reports with the following single active substances were included: dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban; acenocoumarol and warfarin were included as a comparator group. Descriptive statistical methodology was used to evaluate characteristics of the reported cases with a case-by-case assessment. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Out of 521 reports related to anticoagulants, 444 (85.2%) and 77 (14.8%) involved DOACs and VKAs, respectively. DOAC-related reports were mainly of gastrointestinal disorders. In contrast, VKAs were mostly associated with blood and lymphatic system disorders, injury, investigations and vascular disorders. Many more cases of ADRs in the form of gastrointestinal disorders concerned dabigatran etexilate (n = 179, 73.7%) than the other DOACs, while ADRs in the form of blood disorders were mainly associated with acenocoumarol (n = 27, 57.4%). The most commonly reported Preferred Terms for DOACs were dyspepsia (n = 89, 17.1%), upper abdominal pain (n = 41, 9.2%) and pruritus (n = 26, 5.8%), whereas for VKAs, they were anaemia (n = 21, 27.3%) and hypocoagulable state (n = 18, 3.5%). Potentially interacting concomitant medications particularly included antithrombotic agents (n = 19, 4.3%) for DOACs and proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) (n = 37, 48.1%) and antithrombotic agents (n = 13, 16.9%) for VKAs. CONCLUSION: The ADRs most commonly associated with DOACs, especially dabigatran, were gastrointestinal disorders, particularly gastrointestinal bleeding. Our study also highlights the potential role of drug-drug interactions in the ADRs. The cases of gastrointestinal bleeding highlight the need for careful prescribing of DOACs and use of potentially interacting concomitant drugs.

Characteristic of COVID-19 infection in pediatric patients: early findings from two Italian Pediatric Research Networks.

Detailed data on clinical presentations and outcomes of children with COVID-19 in Europe are still lacking. In this descriptive study, we report on 130 children with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosed by 28 centers (mostly hospitals), in 10 regions in Italy, during the first months of the pandemic. Among these, 67 (51.5%) had a relative with COVID-19 while 34 (26.2%) had comorbidities, with the most frequent being respiratory, cardiac, or neuromuscular chronic diseases. Overall, 98 (75.4%) had an asymptomatic or mild disease, 11 (8.5%) had moderate disease, 11 (8.5%) had a severe disease, and 9 (6.9%) had a critical presentation with infants below 6 months having significantly increased risk of critical disease severity (OR 5.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 29.1). Seventy-five (57.7%) children were hospitalized, 15 (11.5%) needed some respiratory support, and nine (6.9%) were treated in an intensive care unit. All recovered.Conclusion:This descriptive case series of children with COVID-19, mostly encompassing of cases enrolled at hospital level, suggest that COVID-19 may have a non-negligible rate of severe presentations in selected pediatric populations with a relatively high rates of comorbidities. More studies are needed to further understand the presentation and outcomes of children with COVID-19 in children with special needs. What is Known: • There is limited evidence on the clinical presentation and outcomes of children with COVID-19 in Europe, and almost no evidence on characteristics and risk factors of severe cases. What is New: • Among a case series of 130 children, mostly diagnosed at hospital level, and with a relatively high rate (26.2%) of comorbidities, about three-quarter had an asymptomatic or mild disease. • However, 57.7% were hospitalized, 11.5% needed some respiratory support, and 6.9% were treated in an intensive care unit.

Clinically relevant drug interactions between statins and antidepressants.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Statins, also known as 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors, and antidepressant drugs are frequently used in combination due to the high and growing incidence of cardiovascular diseases and psychiatric disorders worldwide. Several aspects on management, the risk of adverse events (AEs) occurrence and the potential clinically relevant pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between these two classes have not been well investigated. The aim of the present review was to describe the PK and PD interactions, of clinical relevance, between statins and antidepressant drugs and provide a comprehensive overview of their pharmacological features for appropriate multiple drug regimens. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified through a literature search of PubMed and the Cochrane databases focusing on clinically relevant DDIs between statins and antidepressants. Only papers in English were included in the search. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Pharmacodynamic (PD) drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are unlikely to occur as statins are highly selective inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase with no relevant effect on other enzymes or receptor systems. Despite the numerous PK studies on individual drugs belonging to statins and antidepressant agents, only a few case reports regarding specific DDIs are present in the literature and no clinical studies have been performed. PK data allow to speculate on potential DDIs, comparing the metabolic pathways, intestinal and liver transporters and elimination routes. Overall, second-generation antidepressants, in particular citalopram, escitalopram, mirtazapine, reboxetine and venlafaxine, have weak inhibitory effects on various cytochrome (CYP) isozymes and seem to have a more advantageous DDIs profile in vivo. Conversely, nefazodone, fluoxetine, paroxetine and fluvoxamine influence considerably CYPs activity with potential effects on statins plasma levels, although pravastatin, pitavastatin and rosuvastatin are not susceptible to inhibition by any CYP. Albeit no studies have been performed on P-glycoprotein (P-gp), interactions of clinical relevance are unlikely. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Although DDIs with antidepressants are potentially, but rarely clinically significant, the use of antidepressants with a more favourable drug interaction profile is advisable. An evaluation on DDIs between these drugs can be useful for future PK/PD studies on drug-drug interaction to provide clinicians with more data for appropriate multiple drug regimens.

Ultrasound-guided left brachiocephalic vein cannulation in children with underlying bleeding disorders: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided left brachiocephalic vein cannulation in infants and children with underlying bleeding conditions. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: PICU of a tertiary pediatric hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-four patients requiring central venous catheterization from January 2011 to January 2012. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two pediatric intensivists, experienced in ultrasound-guided vessel cannulation, performed the ultrasound catheterization of the left brachiocephalic vein. Ultrasound equipment consisted of a standard ultrasound monitor with a linear 6-13 MHz probe. The ultrasound monitor was set on a resolution with a depth of 1.8 cm for infants and 2.2 cm for children. The "in-plane" technique was used for all patients. Thirty-four catheterizations were performed. Patient median age was 12.5 months (5.75-63.5 mo) and median weight was 9.25 kg (7-16.25 kg). The population of infants and children analyzed was composed of 25 patients with hematologic disorder (73%) treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, five patients (15%) supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for viral pneumonias, and four patients (12%) with uremic hemolytic syndrome. A 4F catheter was used in 79% of cases. Left brachiocephalic vein cannulation was successful in all 34 patients. Median time needed for cannulation was 350 seconds (277.5-450 s). The overall complication rate was 9% (3 of 34) and consisted of difficulty in advancing the guidewire after having pierced the vein. The time required for catheter positioning and complications was not associated with both lower body weight and body surface area of the patients (p > 0.05). Mean central venous catheter duration was 32 ± 4 days. CONCLUSIONS: Data reported in this retrospective study confirm the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided left brachiocephalic vein catheterization in infants and children with underlying bleeding disorders.

Cardiovascular Adverse Drug Reactions of Anti-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies for Migraine Prevention: An Analysis from the European Spontaneous Adverse Event Reporting System.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP-mAbs) have recently been approved for the prevention of migraine, and their safety profile is not fully characterized. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of anti-CGRP-mAbs through the analysis of individual case safety reports (ICSRs) collected in the EudraVigilance (EV) database, with a specific focus on cardiovascular (CV) ADRs. METHODS: Data on ICSRs recorded between July 2018 and December 2022 in the EV database, involving one of the anti-CGRP-mAbs for migraine prevention-erenumab (ERE), galcanezumab (GMB), fremanezumab (FMB), and eptinezumab (EPT)-were included in the analysis. All ICSRs reporting at least one CV ADR, as identified within the MedDRA® System Organ Classes (SOCs) "cardiac disorders" or "vascular disorders," were selected for the analysis. The frequency of disproportionate reporting was expressed as the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI), to evaluate the frequency of reporting of CV ADRs for each anti-CGRP-mAb compared with all other monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). A case-by-case analysis was conducted paying particular attention to serious CV ADR reports, focusing on the type of seriousness, age group, sex, and concomitant drugs. RESULTS: A total of 9441 ICSRs were recorded in the EV database from 2018 to 2022, of which more than half were related to ERE (58.9%), followed by GMB (21.4%), FMB (19.0%), and EPT (0.7%). CV ICSRs accounted for 1205 cases (12.8%), with a total of 1599 CV ADRs. The CV ICSRs were mainly related to female patients (82.6%) aged 18-64 years (73.4%). Of the reported CV ADRs, 67.5% were considered serious. Among the total number of ICSRs related to each anti-CGRP-mAb, those associated with FMB had a higher percentage of CV ADRs (n = 253; 14.1%), followed by ERE (n = 707; 12.7%), EPT (n = 8; 12.7%), and GMB (n = 237; 11.7%). A higher frequency of reporting hypertension was shown for ERE (ROR = 1.45; 95% CI = 1.14-1.85). Pallor was mainly observed with FMB (5.00; 1.68-14.89), as well as deep vein thrombosis (3.86; 1.57-9.51), hot flush (2.16; 1.43-3.25), and palpitations (1.48; 1.05-2.08). Atrial fibrillation (2.36; 1.02-5.46) and myocardial infarction (2.21; 1.37-3.58) were mostly reported for GMB. CONCLUSION: The analysis of anti-CGRP-related CV ADRs was consistent with the information reported in the literature. However, hypertension with ERE, atrial fibrillation and myocardial infarction with GMB, as well as pallor, deep vein thrombosis, hot flush, and palpitations with FMB were not reported in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPCs). Considering this, more post-marketing analyses are needed to improve knowledge on the CV safety profiles of anti-CGRP-mAbs, especially for the last approved medication, EPT.

Safety of Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist Daridorexant: A Disproportionality Analysis of Publicly Available FAERS Data.

Daridorexant (dari), as the first dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA) marketed in Europe, offers a novel therapeutic approach to insomnia. However, data regarding its real-world safety are scarce. Thus, this study was aimed at assessing its safety profile using a large-scale pharmacovigilance database. Dari-related adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System were scrutinized, and ADRs were selected using reporting odds ratio (ROR) as a measure of disproportionality. Frequencies of events related to dari were compared to all other drugs (reference group, RG1) and only to other DORAs (RG2). Only significant disproportionalities to both RGs were evaluated in-depth. A total of 845 dari-related reports were selected; nightmares (n = 146; dari vs. RG1: ROR = 113.74; 95%CI [95.13, 136]; dari vs. RG2: ROR = 2.35; 95 CI% [1.93, 2.85]), depression (n = 22; dari vs. RG1: 2.13; [1.39, 3.25]; dari vs. RG2: ROR = 2.31; 95 CI% [1.45, 3.67]), and hangover (n = 20; dari vs. RG1: ROR = 127.92; 95 CI% [81.98, 199.62]; and dari vs. RG2: 3.38; [2.04, 5.61]) were considered as safety signals. These data provide valuable insights into the real-world safety profile of daridorexant, supporting the existence of safety signals related to nightmares, depression, and hangovers.

Exploring the impact of co-exposure timing on drug-drug interactions in signal detection through spontaneous reporting system databases: a scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are defined as the pharmacological effects produced by the concomitant administration of two or more drugs. To minimize false positive signals and ensure their validity when analyzing Spontaneous Reporting System (SRS) databases, it has been suggested to incorporate key pharmacological principles, such as temporal plausibility. AREAS COVERED: The scoping review of the literature was completed using MEDLINE from inception to March 2023. Included studies had to provide detailed methods for identifying DDIs in SRS databases. Any methodological approach and adverse event were accepted. Descriptive analyzes were excluded as we focused on automatic signal detection methods. The result is an overview of all the available methods for DDI signal detection in SRS databases, with a specific focus on the evaluation of the co-exposure time of the interacting drugs. It is worth noting that only a limited number of studies (n = 3) have attempted to address the issue of overlapping drug administration times. EXPERT OPINION: Current guidelines for signal validation focus on factors like the number of reports and temporal association, but they lack guidance on addressing overlapping drug administration times, highlighting a need for further research and method development.

Comparing major and mild cognitive impairment risks in older type-2 diabetic patients: a Danish register-based study on dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors vs. glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of major and mild cognitive impairment (CI) in type-2 diabetes older patients is 15-25% and 30-60%, respectively, thus affecting quality of life and health outcomes. There is, therefore, the need of head-to-head studies aiming at identifying the optimal treatment for individuals with type-2 diabetes at increased risk of mild and major CI. This study focuses on the risk of developing mild and major CI in Danish patients treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues (GLP-1a) using administrative and healthcare registers. METHODS: An active comparator design with a 3-year follow-up period was used. The main outcome was the hospital admission with a diagnosis of mild CI or major CI. Multivariate Cox Regression analysis was performed using the high-dimensional propensity score to obtain adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) estimates. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and marginal structured model were used to calculate risk differences while accounting for the variations of confounders throughout the follow-up period. RESULTS: Our results show a significant higher risk of major CI between DPP-4i and GLP-1a in unadjusted [HR (95% CI) = 3.13 (2.45-4.00), p < 0.001] and adjusted analyses [HR (95% CI) = 1.58 (1.22-2.06), p = 0.001]. No statistically significant differences were observed for mild CI. IPTW resulted stable throughout the follow-up period. Marginal structure modeling (ß (95% CI) = 0.022 (0.020-0.024), p < 0.001) resulted in a higher risk of major CI for DPP-4i when compared to GLP-1a. DISCUSSION: DPP-4i was associated with an increased risk of developing major CI when compared to GLP-1a among older individuals with type-2 diabetes.

Timing Matters: A Machine Learning Method for the Prioritization of Drug-Drug Interactions Through Signal Detection in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and Their Relationship with Time of Co-exposure.

INTRODUCTION: Current drug-drug interaction (DDI) detection methods often miss the aspect of temporal plausibility, leading to false-positive disproportionality signals in spontaneous reporting system (SRS) databases. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop a method for detecting and prioritizing temporally plausible disproportionality signals of DDIs in SRS databases by incorporating co-exposure time in disproportionality analysis. METHODS: The method was tested in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The CRESCENDDI dataset of positive controls served as the primary source of true-positive DDIs. Disproportionality analysis was performed considering the time of co-exposure. Temporal plausibility was assessed using the flex point of cumulative reporting of disproportionality signals. Potential confounders were identified using a machine learning method (i.e. Lasso regression). RESULTS: Disproportionality analysis was conducted on 122 triplets with more than three cases, resulting in the prioritization of 61 disproportionality signals (50.0%) involving 13 adverse events, with 61.5% of these included in the European Medicine Agency's (EMA's) Important Medical Event (IME) list. A total of 27 signals (44.3%) had at least ten cases reporting the triplet of interest, and most of them (n = 19; 70.4%) were temporally plausible. The retrieved confounders were mainly other concomitant drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Our method was able to prioritize disproportionality signals with temporal plausibility. This finding suggests a potential for our method in pinpointing signals that are more likely to be furtherly validated.

Drug Repurposing in Crohn's Disease Using Danish Real-World Data.

Aim: Drug repurposing, utilizing electronic healthcare records (EHRs), offers a promising alternative by repurposing existing drugs for new therapeutic indications, especially for patients lacking effective therapies. Intestinal fibrosis, a severe complication of Crohn's disease (CD), poses significant challenges, increasing morbidity and mortality without available pharmacological treatments. This article focuses on identifying medications associated with an elevated or reduced risk of fibrosis in CD patients through a population-wide real-world data and artificial intelligence (AI) approach. Methods: Patients aged 65 or older with a diagnosis of CD from 1996 to 2019 in the Danish EHRs were followed for up to 24 years. The primary outcome was the need of specific surgical procedures, namely proctocolectomy with ileostomy and ileocecal resection as proxies of intestinal fibrosis. The study explored drugs linked to an increased or reduced risk of the study outcome through machine-learning driven survival analysis. Results: Among the 9179 CD patients, 1029 (11.2%) underwent surgery, primarily men (58.5%), with a mean age of 76 years, 10 drugs were linked to an elevated risk of surgery for proctocolectomy with ileostomy and ileocecal resection. In contrast, 10 drugs were associated with a reduced risk of undergoing surgery for these conditions. Conclusion: This study focuses on repurposing existing drugs to prevent surgery related to intestinal fibrosis in CD patients, using Danish EHRs and advanced statistical methods. The findings offer valuable insights into potential treatments for this condition, addressing a critical unmet medical need. Further research and clinical trials are warranted to validate the effectiveness of these repurposed drugs in preventing surgery related to intestinal fibrosis in CD patients.

Drug Safety and Relevant Issues in the Real-World.

The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the pivotal role of drug safety and effective communication within the realm of pharmacovigilance, particularly in times of unprecedented public health emergencies [...].

Cenobamate: A Review of its Pharmacological Properties, Clinical Efficacy and Tolerability Profile in the Treatment of Epilepsy.

Cenobamate is a novel antiseizure medication (ASM) commercially available in Europe and in the U.S. for the treatment of focal seizures in adults. The mechanisms responsible for its antiseizure activity include enhancement of the inactivated state of voltage-gated sodium channels with blockade of the persistent sodium current and positive allosteric modulation of GABAA receptors at a non-benzodiazepine binding site. Cenobamate has a high oral bioavailability that is not influenced by food intake. The terminal half-life is 50-60 hours, allowing for once-daily dosing. Cenobamate is a CYP2C19 inhibitor and an inducer of CYP3A4 and CYP2B6, and consequently, it can cause a number of drug-drug interactions. Efficacy and safety have been evaluated in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled adjunctive therapy trials in adults with focal seizures. In both trials, cenobamate decreased significantly the frequency of focal seizures, with relatively high seizure freedom rates. Adverse events most commonly reported in double-blind trials included dizziness, somnolence, headache, fatigue, and diplopia. The occurrence of three cases of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) during early clinical development led to the conduction of a Phase 3 open-label long-term safety study in a total of 1339 patients. In this study, no serious idiosyncratic adverse reactions were observed using a start-low and go-slow approach. Further studies are required to determine whether the clinical activity profile of cenobamate extends to protection against other seizure types and to evaluate its efficacy and safety profile in special patient groups such as infants, children, the elderly, and patients with comorbid conditions.

Optimization of Therapy in Patients with Epilepsy and Psychiatric Comorbidities: Key Points.

Psychiatric disorder comorbidity in patients with epilepsy (PWE) is very frequent with a mean percentage prevalence of up to 50% and even higher. Such a high frequency suggests that epilepsy and psychiatric disorders might share common pathological pathways. Various aspects contribute in making the matter very complex from a therapeutic point of view. Some antiseizure medications (ASMs), namely valproic acid, carbamazepine, and lamotrigine, have mood-stabilising effects and are routinely used for the treatment of bipolar disorder in patients who do not have epilepsy. Pregabalin and, to a lesser extent, gabapentin, exerts anxiolytic effects. However, several ASMs, in particular levetiracetam, topiramate, and perampanel, may contribute to psychiatric disorders, including depression, aggressive behaviour, and even psychosis. If these ASMs are prescribed, the patient should be monitored closely. A careful selection should be made also with psychotropic drugs. Although most of these can be safely used at therapeutic doses, bupropion, some tricyclic antidepressants, maprotiline, and clozapine may alter seizure threshold and facilitate epileptic seizures. Interactions between ASMs and psychotropic medication may make it difficult to predict individual response. Pharmacokinetic interactions can be assessed with drug monitoring and are consequently much better documented than pharmacodynamic interactions. Another aspect that needs a careful evaluation is patient adherence to treatment. Prevalence of non-adherence in PWE and psychiatric comorbidities is reported to reach values even higher than 70%. A careful evaluation of all these aspects contributes in optimizing therapy with a positive impact on seizure control, psychiatric wellbeing, and quality of life.

Effectiveness and Safety Profile of Dupilumab in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: Real-Life Data in Tertiary Care.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is characterized by a type 2 pattern of inflammation resulting in the production of some cytokines. Dupilumab radically changes the treatment of CRSwNP, but, considering its recent approval, it may be useful to evaluate its safety profile in a real-world setting. This work aimed to prospectively highlight the effectiveness and safety profile of dupilumab in patients with CRSwNP enrolled in the Otorhinolaryngology Unit of the University Hospital of Messina. An observational cohort study was carried out considering all patients treated with dupilumab. A descriptive analysis was conducted reporting all demographic characteristics, endoscopic evaluations, and symptom conditions. A total of 66 patients were treated with dupilumab, but three patients were excluded due to a lack of adherence during the observational period. A statistically significant reduction in the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) and nasal polyps score (NPS) was shown at the 6th and 12th months compared to baseline values (SNOT-22, -37 and -50, p < 0.001 for both comparisons; NPS, -3 and -4, p < 0.001 for both comparisons). During the follow-up, eight patients (12.7%) had a reaction at the site of injection, and seven (11.1%) had transient hypereosinophilia. Given the optimal treatment response and the minimal adverse effects observed, clinicians should consider dupilumab a safe and effective treatment. Further studies are necessary to better understand the long-term effects.