Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Ano de publicação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Hum Fertil (Camb) ; 19(2): 120-6, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27335274

RESUMO

Purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate if serum markers, men's age, interval since vasectomy, BMI, testicular size and smoking could predict the success of epididymal or testicular sperm aspiration (PESA/TESA) in vasectomized men. Forty-four consecutively performed PESA/TESA procedures were reviewed retrospectively. Motile sperm was retrieved from 77.3% of PESA/TESA procedures. Mean serum Inhibin-B (Inh-B) level tended to be higher in men who had motile sperm retrieved compared to those who had not (180.3 versus 126.2 pg/ml, p = 0.05). Univariate analysis identified serum Inh-B to be the only predictor of PESA/TESA success (r = 0.32, CI: 0.006-0.584, p = 0.046). Serum FSH, LH, T levels, age, BMI, smoking status and interval since vasectomy did not correlate with the PESA/TESA outcome. Inh-B could modestly discriminate between successful and unsuccessful PESA/TESA (AUC= 0.70) with high positive (89.5%) but low negative prediction (36.8%); 58.6% sensitivity and 77.7% specificity at the optimum cut-off level of 166 pg/ml. Positive outcome was only 50% when the Inh-B level was below 100 pg/ml. It is concluded that a high serum Inh-B might reliably predict successful PESA/TESA in vasectomized men. More invasive sperm retrieval procedures could be reserved for men with very low Inh-B or failed PESA/TESA. Future studies with adequate power may confirm our findings.


Assuntos
Epididimo/citologia , Recuperação Espermática , Espermatozoides/citologia , Testículo/citologia , Vasectomia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Feminino , Humanos , Inibinas/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fumar , Motilidade dos Espermatozoides/fisiologia , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Hum Fertil (Camb) ; 12(3): 125-36, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19657846

RESUMO

AIM: The aim of this article is to review the evidence regarding human oocyte cryopreservation by slow freezing and vitrification and to provide evidence-based clinical and laboratory guidelines on the effectiveness and safety of these technologies. SCOPE: These guidelines will address the following: Stage of oocyte maturity. Methods of cryopreservation/warming. Slow controlled cooling. Vitrification. Techniques used for insemination. Ovarian stimulation regimens. The guidelines do not cover recommendations for ovarian tissue freezing or in vitro oocyte maturation (IVM). OUTCOME MEASURES: The following outcome measures were examined: cryosurvival, fertilisation rate, cleavage rate, clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate, health of resulting children.


Assuntos
Criopreservação/métodos , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Oócitos , Crioprotetores , Transferência Embrionária/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Inseminação Artificial/métodos , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA